Literature DB >> 26789119

Keratoconus: The ABCD Grading System.

M W Belin1, J K Duncan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To propose a new keratoconus classification/staging system that utilises current tomographic data and better reflects the anatomical and functional changes seen in keratoconus.
METHOD: A previously published normative database was reanalysed to generate both anterior and posterior average radii of curvature (ARC and PRC) taken from a 3.0 mm optical zone centred on the thinnest point of the cornea. Mean and standard deviations were recorded and anterior data were compared to the existing Amsler-Krumeich (AK) Classification. ARC, PRC, thinnest pachymetry and distance visual acuity were then used to construct a keratoconus classification.
RESULTS: 672 eyes of 336 patients were analysed. Anterior and posterior values were 7.65 ± 0.236 mm and 6.26 ± 0.214 mm, respectively, and thinnest pachymetry values were 534.2 ± 30.36 µm. The ARC values were 2.63, 5.47 and 6.44 standard deviations from the mean values of stages 1-3 in the AK classification, respectively. PRC staging uses the same standard deviation gates. The pachymetric values differed by 4.42 and 7.72 standard deviations for stages 2 and 3, respectively.
CONCLUSION: A new keratoconus staging incorporates anterior and posterior curvature, thinnest pachymetric values, and distance visual acuity and consists of stages 0-4 (5 stages). The proposed system closely matches the existing AK classification stages 1-4 on anterior curvature. As it incorporates posterior curvature and thickness measurements based on the thinnest point, rather than apical measurements, the new staging system better reflects the anatomical changes seen in keratoconus. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26789119     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-100626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd        ISSN: 0023-2165            Impact factor:   0.700


  43 in total

1.  Keratoconus after 40 years of age: a longitudinal comparative population-based study.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Soheila Asgari; Shiva Mehravaran; Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Clinical Evaluation and Validation of the Dutch Crosslinking for Keratoconus Score.

Authors:  Robert P L Wisse; Rob W P Simons; Martijn J B van der Vossen; Marc B Muijzer; Nienke Soeters; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Daniel A Godefrooij
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 3.  [Riboflavin UVA crosslinking in progressive keratoconus].

Authors:  P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Corneal cross-linking in patients with keratoconus: up to 13 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Christian Enders; Diana Vogel; Jens Dreyhaupt; Waltraud Wolf; Aylin Garip-Kuebler; Jonathan Hall; Lukas Neuhann; Jens Ulrich Werner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Comparing the natural progression and clinical features of keratoconus between pediatric and adult patients.

Authors:  Ken-Kuo Lin; Yun-Wen Chen; Chun-Ting Yeh; Pei-Ru Li; Jiahn-Shing Lee; Chiun-Ho Hou; Ching-Hsi Hsiao; Lai-Chu See
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Performances of Corneal Topography and Tomography in the Diagnosis of Subclinical and Clinical Keratoconus.

Authors:  Cristina Ariadna Nicula; Adriana Elena Bulboacă; Dorin Nicula; Ariadna Patricia Nicula; Karin Ursula Horvath; Sorana D Bolboacă
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-26

7.  Altered Regulation of mRNA and miRNA Expression in Epithelial and Stromal Tissue of Keratoconus Corneas.

Authors:  Tanja Stachon; Mahsa Nastaranpour; Berthold Seitz; Eckart Meese; Lorenz Latta; Suphi Taneri; Navid Ardjomand; Nóra Szentmáry; Nicole Ludwig
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.925

8.  High-frequency ultrasound detects biomechanical weakening in keratoconus with lower stiffness at higher grade.

Authors:  Sunny Kwok; Xueliang Pan; William Liu; Andrew Hendershot; Jun Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 9.  A review of imaging modalities for detecting early keratoconus.

Authors:  Xuemin Zhang; Saleha Z Munir; Syed A Sami Karim; Wuqaas M Munir
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  [Early diagnosis of keratoconus].

Authors:  Stefan J Lang; P Maier; T Böhringer; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.