Literature DB >> 26788967

Influence of slice overlap on positron emission tomography image quality.

Clare McKeown1, Gerry Gillen, Mary Frances Dempsey, Caroline Findlay.   

Abstract

PET scans use overlapping acquisition beds to correct for reduced sensitivity at bed edges. The optimum overlap size for the General Electric (GE) Discovery 690 has not been established. This study assesses how image quality is affected by slice overlap. Efficacy of 23% overlaps (recommended by GE) and 49% overlaps (maximum possible overlap) were specifically assessed. European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines for calculating minimum injected activities based on overlap size were also reviewed. A uniform flood phantom was used to assess noise (coefficient of variation, (COV)) and voxel accuracy (activity concentrations, Bq ml(-1)). A NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) body phantom with hot/cold spheres in a background activity was used to assess contrast recovery coefficients (CRCs) and signal to noise ratios (SNR). Different overlap sizes and sphere-to-background ratios were assessed. COVs for 49% and 23% overlaps were 9% and 13% respectively. This increased noise was difficult to visualise on the 23% overlap images. Mean voxel activity concentrations were not affected by overlap size. No clinically significant differences in CRCs were observed. However, visibility and SNR of small, low contrast spheres (⩽13 mm diameter, 2:1 sphere to background ratio) may be affected by overlap size in low count studies if they are located in the overlap area. There was minimal detectable influence on image quality in terms of noise, mean activity concentrations or mean CRCs when comparing 23% overlap with 49% overlap. Detectability of small, low contrast lesions may be affected in low count studies-however, this is a worst-case scenario. The marginal benefits of increasing overlap from 23% to 49% are likely to be offset by increased patient scan times. A 23% overlap is therefore appropriate for clinical use. An amendment to EANM guidelines for calculating injected activities is also proposed which better reflects the effect overlap size has on image noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26788967     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/3/1259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  2 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of the 5-Ring GE Discovery MI PET/CT system using the national electrical manufacturers association NU 2-2012 Standard.

Authors:  Tinsu Pan; Samuel A Einstein; Srinivas Cheenu Kappadath; Kira S Grogg; Cristina Lois Gomez; Adam M Alessio; William C Hunter; Georges El Fakhri; Paul E Kinahan; Osama R Mawlawi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The effect of modern PET technology and techniques on the EANM paediatric dosage card.

Authors:  John Dickson; Uta Eberlein; Michael Lassmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 10.057

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.