PURPOSE: To explore the effects of training against mechanically different types of loads on muscle force (F), velocity (V), and power (P) outputs. METHODS: Subjects practiced maximum bench throws over 8 wk against a bar predominantly loaded by approximately constant external force (weight), weight plates (weight plus inertia), or weight plates whose weight was compensated by a constant external force pulling upward (inertia). Instead of a typically applied single trial performed against a selected load, the pretest and posttest consisted of the same task performed against 8 different loads ranging from 30% to 79% of the subject's maximum strength applied by adding weight plates to the bar. That provided a range of F and V data for subsequent modeling by linear F-V regression revealing the maximum F (F-intercept), V (V-intercept), and P (P = FV/4). RESULTS: Although all 3 training conditions resulted in increased P, the inertia type of the training load could be somewhat more effective than weight. An even more important finding was that the P increase could be almost exclusively based on a gain in F, V, or both when weight, inertia, or weight-plus-inertia training load were applied, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The inertia training load is more effective than weight in increasing P and weight and inertia may be applied for selective gains in F and V, respectively, whereas the linear F-V model obtained from loaded trials could be used for discerning among muscle F, V, and P.
PURPOSE: To explore the effects of training against mechanically different types of loads on muscle force (F), velocity (V), and power (P) outputs. METHODS: Subjects practiced maximum bench throws over 8 wk against a bar predominantly loaded by approximately constant external force (weight), weight plates (weight plus inertia), or weight plates whose weight was compensated by a constant external force pulling upward (inertia). Instead of a typically applied single trial performed against a selected load, the pretest and posttest consisted of the same task performed against 8 different loads ranging from 30% to 79% of the subject's maximum strength applied by adding weight plates to the bar. That provided a range of F and V data for subsequent modeling by linear F-V regression revealing the maximum F (F-intercept), V (V-intercept), and P (P = FV/4). RESULTS: Although all 3 training conditions resulted in increased P, the inertia type of the training load could be somewhat more effective than weight. An even more important finding was that the P increase could be almost exclusively based on a gain in F, V, or both when weight, inertia, or weight-plus-inertia training load were applied, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The inertia training load is more effective than weight in increasing P and weight and inertia may be applied for selective gains in F and V, respectively, whereas the linear F-V model obtained from loaded trials could be used for discerning among muscle F, V, and P.
Authors: Kolbjørn Lindberg; Paul Solberg; Thomas Bjørnsen; Christian Helland; Bent Rønnestad; Martin Thorsen Frank; Thomas Haugen; Sindre Østerås; Morten Kristoffersen; Magnus Midttun; Fredrik Sæland; Gøran Paulsen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Saša Đurić; Olivera M Knezevic; Vedrana Sember; Ivan Cuk; Aleksandar Nedeljkovic; Maja Pajek; Dragan M Mirkov Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Marko Cosic; Sasa Djuric; Milena Z Zivkovic; Aleksandar Nedeljkovic; Bojan Leontijevic; Slobodan Jaric Journal: J Hum Kinet Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 2.193