| Literature DB >> 26788756 |
Abstract
The Matthew effect hypothesis in reading predicts that the gap between good and poor readers increases with time. Although, intuitively appealing, the Matthew effect has hardly been empirically studied in longitudinal studies of reading. Two competing longitudinal models were used to represent the Matthew effect hypothesis: the Latent Growth Curve model and the Simplex model with structured means. It is argued that on the basis of theoretical and empirical arguments the Simplex model should be preferred to represent and analyze the Matthew effect hypothesis. However, the results of the Simplex models imply that conceptual refinement and clarification of Matthew effects in reading are needed.Year: 1997 PMID: 26788756 DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Multivariate Behav Res ISSN: 0027-3171 Impact factor: 5.923