| Literature DB >> 26788371 |
Usha Dandekar1, Kundankumar Dandekar2, Sushama Chavan3.
Abstract
The right hepatic artery is an end artery and contributes sole arterial supply to right lobe of the liver. Misinterpretation of normal anatomy and anatomical variations of the right hepatic artery contribute to the major intraoperative mishaps and complications in hepatobiliary surgery. The frequency of inadvertent or iatrogenic hepatobiliary vascular injury rises with the event of an aberrant anatomy. This descriptive study was carried out to document the normal anatomy and different variations of right hepatic artery to contribute to existing knowledge of right hepatic artery to improve surgical safety. This study conducted on 60 cadavers revealed aberrant replaced right hepatic artery in 18.3% and aberrant accessory right hepatic artery in 3.4%. Considering the course, the right hepatic artery ran outside Calot's triangle in 5% of cases and caterpillar hump right hepatic artery was seen in 13.3% of cases. The right hepatic artery (normal and aberrant) crossed anteriorly to the common hepatic duct in 8.3% and posteriorly to it in 71.6%. It has posterior relations with the common bile duct in 16.7% while in 3.4% it did not cross the common hepatic duct or common bile duct. The knowledge of such anomalies is important since their awareness will decrease morbidity and help to keep away from a number of surgical complications.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26788371 PMCID: PMC4695647 DOI: 10.1155/2015/412595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anat Res Int ISSN: 2090-2743
Figure 1Replaced origin of RHA from SMA.
Figure 2Accessory RHA arising from GDA.
Figure 3RHA crossing CHD anteriorly and entering Calot's triangle.
Figure 4RHA coursing outside Calot's triangle.
Position of RHA within Calot's triangle.
| Position within Calot's triangle | Number of specimens (95%) |
|---|---|
| Upper | 33.3% |
| Middle | 40% |
| Lower | 21.7% |
Figure 5Course of RHA posterior to CHD.
Figure 6RHA coursing posterior to CBD.
Figure 7Caterpillar hump RHA.
Incidence of variations of origin of RHA.
| Origin of RHA | Flint [ | Jones and Hardy [ | Bhardwaj [ | Ugurel et al. [ | Stauffer et al. [ | Sehgal et al. [ | Sureka et al. [ | Present study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHA/CHA | 79 | 75 | 85 | 77 | 83.8 | 83.7 | 79.6 | 78.3 |
|
| ||||||||
| Replaced RHA | ||||||||
| SMA | 21 | 18 | 8.3 | 19 | 12.1 | 11.6 | 13.5 | 13.3 |
| CT | — | — | 6.7 | — | — | 2.33 | 1.33 | 3.3 |
| Aorta | — | 1 | — | 1 | — | — | 0.33 | 1.7 |
| MCA | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| GDA | — | 6 | — | — | — | 2.33 | — | — |
|
| ||||||||
| Accessory RHA | ||||||||
| SMA | 3.5 | — | 1.7 | 2 | 2.6 | 8 | 3.5 | — |
| GDA | — | — | 3.3 | — | 0.5 | — | — | 1.7 |
| CHA | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.7 |
| CT | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 1 | — |
| Aorta | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.66 | — |
Prevalence of variable relationship of RHA with CHD and CBD.
|
Daseler quoted in [ | Flint [ | Johnston and Anson [ | Present study (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHD | ||||
| Anterior | 11.6 | 12.5 | 11.4 | 8.3 |
| Posterior | 65 | 68 | 74.3 | 71.6 |
|
| ||||
| CBD | ||||
| Anterior | 1.4 | — | — | — |
| Posterior | 11.6 | 12.5 | 20 | 16.7 |
Incidence of origin of cystic artery from RHA.
| Michels [ | Saidi et al. [ | Khalil et al. [ | Bakheit [ | Pushpalatha and Shamasundar [ | Present study (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70 | 92.2 | 90 | 78 | 54 | 91.6 |