Nahid Punjani1, Eric Winquist2, Nicholas Power1. 1. Division of Urology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON; 2. Division of Medical Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Extragonadal germ cell tumours (GCTs) have been described arising in midline structures. Although primary retroperitoneal extragonadal GCTs (RPGCTs) comprise 30% to 40% of these, their existence as a genuine disease has been questioned. Our study evaluated clinicopathological findings to examine this question in RPGCT patients at our centre. METHODS: Data from 414 men between 1980 and 2014 treated at London Health Sciences Centre with chemotherapy for testicular GCTs were reviewed retrospectively. Primary RPGCT was defined as pathologically diagnosed GCT with no evidence of GCT in the testes by physical exam or ultrasound. Patients thought to have primary RPGCT at the time of initial diagnosis were identified from an electronic database and data were extracted. RESULTS: In total, 18 men with a diagnosis of metastatic RPGCT were identified. Four were excluded due to ultrasound reports that were incomplete or suggested malignancy. The remaining 14 patients had negative or non-specific ultrasounds, and all received platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Ten patients (71%) underwent post-chemotherapy RP lymph node dissections; of those 8 (57%) who underwent orchiectomy, none had corresponding pathologically normal testicular tissue. CONCLUSION: RPGCT patients present with more advanced disease stage. Our study sample size is limited, but the findings are consistent with existing literature suggesting that primary RPGCTs may not exist as a unique disease, but instead may represent metastatic disease from a clinically occult testicular primary. By corollary, viable malignant germ cells may be present in testes of patients with presumed primary RPGCT, and may persist as a site of residual malignant disease after chemotherapy.
INTRODUCTION: Extragonadal germ cell tumours (GCTs) have been described arising in midline structures. Although primary retroperitoneal extragonadal GCTs (RPGCTs) comprise 30% to 40% of these, their existence as a genuine disease has been questioned. Our study evaluated clinicopathological findings to examine this question in RPGCT patients at our centre. METHODS: Data from 414 men between 1980 and 2014 treated at London Health Sciences Centre with chemotherapy for testicular GCTs were reviewed retrospectively. Primary RPGCT was defined as pathologically diagnosed GCT with no evidence of GCT in the testes by physical exam or ultrasound. Patients thought to have primary RPGCT at the time of initial diagnosis were identified from an electronic database and data were extracted. RESULTS: In total, 18 men with a diagnosis of metastatic RPGCT were identified. Four were excluded due to ultrasound reports that were incomplete or suggested malignancy. The remaining 14 patients had negative or non-specific ultrasounds, and all received platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Ten patients (71%) underwent post-chemotherapy RP lymph node dissections; of those 8 (57%) who underwent orchiectomy, none had corresponding pathologically normal testicular tissue. CONCLUSION: RPGCT patients present with more advanced disease stage. Our study sample size is limited, but the findings are consistent with existing literature suggesting that primary RPGCTs may not exist as a unique disease, but instead may represent metastatic disease from a clinically occult testicular primary. By corollary, viable malignant germ cells may be present in testes of patients with presumed primary RPGCT, and may persist as a site of residual malignant disease after chemotherapy.
Authors: Carsten Bokemeyer; Jorg T Hartmann; Sophie D Fossa; Jean-P Droz; Hans-J Schmol; Alan Horwich; Arthur Gerl; Jorg Beyer; Jorg Pont; Lothar Kanz; Craig R Nichols; Lawrence Einhorn Journal: APMIS Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Rocío González; Paula Montoto Santomé; Eva Iglesias Porto; M Isabel Pérez Moreiras; Mohammed Salem Ali; Luis A Mateo Cambón; Fernando Bal Nieves; J Felix Arija Val Journal: Arch Esp Urol Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 0.436
Authors: P E Goss; L Schwertfeger; M E Blackstein; N A Iscoe; R J Ginsberg; W J Simpson; D P Jones; F A Shepherd Journal: Cancer Date: 1994-04-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: David Parada; Karla B Peña; Otto Moreira; Iván Cohen; Arelí M Parada; Luis D Mejías Journal: Arch Esp Urol Date: 2007 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 0.436
Authors: Maria João Serpa; Susana Franco; Diana Repolho; Francisco Branco; João Gramaça; José Ferreira Júnior Journal: Eur J Case Rep Intern Med Date: 2018-07-26
Authors: Arnon Lavi; Eric Winquist; Shiva M Nair; Joseph L Chin; Jonathan Izawa; Ricardo Fernandes; Scott Ernst; Nicholas E Power Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2020-12-08 Impact factor: 3.677