| Literature DB >> 26788149 |
Yuqin Yao1, Yongjun Zhou2, Xiaolan Su2, Lei Dai2, Lin Yu2, Hongxin Deng2, Lantu Gou2, Jinliang Yang3.
Abstract
Establishing a feasible intraperitoneal (i.p.) xenograft model in nude mice is a good strategy to evaluate the antitumor effect of drugs in vivo. However, the manipulation of human cancer cells in establishing a stable peritoneal carcinomatosis model in nude mice is problematic. In the present study, the ovarian and colorectal peritoneal tumor models were successfully established in nude mice by co-injection of human tumor cells and extracellular matrix gel. In ovarian tumor models, the mean number tumor nodes was significantly higher in the experimental group (intraperitoneal tumor cell co-injection with ECM gel) compared with the PBS control group on the 30th day (21.0±3.0 vs. 3.6±2.5; P<0.05). The same results were observed in the colorectal peritoneal tumor models on the 28th day. The colorectal peritoneal tumor model was further used to evaluate the chemotherapy effect of irinotecan (CPT-11). The mean weight of peritoneal tumor nodes in CPT-11 treatment group was significantly less than that of the control group (0.81±0.16 vs. 2.18±0.21 g; P<0.05). The results confirmed the value of these i.p. xenograft models in nude mice as efficient and feasible tools for preclinical evaluation.Entities:
Keywords: extracellular matrix gel; intraperitoneal xenograft model; irinotecan; tumor
Year: 2015 PMID: 26788149 PMCID: PMC4665880 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1.Macroscopic and microscopic observation of ovarian intraperitoneal xenografts in nude mice sacrificed on the 10th, 25th and 30th days. Macroscopic and representative images of mice from the PBS and ECM groups sacrificed on (A) the 10th day, (B) the 25th day, and (C) the 30th day, with black arrows indicating the representative tumor nodule. (D) Microscopic observation of H&E staining of frozen sections (×100 magnification) of the tumor nodules indicated by the black arrows on the 25th and 30th day, respectively. (E) Magnified image showing the peritoneal cavity of the mouse from the ECM group, as indicated by the black arrow, on the 25th day. ECM, extracellular matrix; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.
Dynamic progression of i.p. xenografts of human ovarian and colorectal cancer in nude mice at different time-points post-i.p. injection.
| Cell line | Day | Tumor nodes in ECM group, n[ | Tumor nodes in PBS group, n[ |
|---|---|---|---|
| SKOV-3 | 10 | 6.3±2.5[ | 1.0±1.0 |
| 25 | 17.7±2.1[ | 3.3±1.5 | |
| 30 | 21.0±3.0[ | 3.6±2.5 | |
| HCT-116 | 7 | 8.0±2.6[ | 1.7±0.8 |
| 14 | 13.0±2.0[ | 3.0±1.0 | |
| 28 | >50[ | 5.0±1.5 |
Mean ± standard deviation.
P<0.05 vs. PBS group. i.p., intraperitoneal; ECM, extracellular matrix; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
Figure 2.Macroscopic and microscopic observation of colorectal intraperitoneal xenografts in nude mice sacrificed on the 7th, 14th and 28th days. Macroscopic and representative images of mice from the PBS and ECM groups sacrificed on (A) the 7th day, (B) the 14th day and (C) the 28th day, with black arrows indicating the representative tumor nodules. (D) Microscopic observation of the H&E staining of frozen sections (×100 magnification) of the tumor nodules indicated by the black arrows on the 10th, 14th and 28th days. ECM, extracellular matrix; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.
Figure 3.Antitumor evaluation of CPT-11 performed in a colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis nude mouse model in vivo. (A) Macroscopic observation of mice sacrificed on the 21st day in the NS control and CPT-11 groups. (B) Macroscopic observation of total tumor nodules of the mice in the NS control and CPT-11 groups. (C) Total weight of peritoneal tumor nodules in the NS control and CPT-11 groups. (D) Body weights of mice were monitored every 4 days. (E) Numbers of tumor nodes in the NS control and CPT-11 groups. *P<0.05. CPT-11, irinotecan; NS, normal saline.