| Literature DB >> 26788081 |
Ewa Piotrowicz1, Teodor Buchner2, Walerian Piotrowski3, Ryszard Piotrowicz4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Rehabilitation positively affects the modulation of the autonomic nervous system (ANS). There are no papers evaluating the influence of Nordic walking training (NW) on ANS activity among chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. The aim of study was to assess the influence of NW on ANS activity measured by heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate turbulence (HRT) in CHF patients and its correlation with physical capacity improvement measured by peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2 [ml/kg/min]) in the cardiopulmonary exercise treadmill test (CPET).Entities:
Keywords: autonomic nervous system; exercise training; heart failure; heart rate variability
Year: 2015 PMID: 26788081 PMCID: PMC4697054 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2015.56346
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristics | Training group ( | Control group ( | Value of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Males | 31 (86) | 15 (100) | NS |
| Age [years] | 52.6 ±10.12 | 61.4 ±13.2 | 0.0205 |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) | 32 ±7 | 33 ±8 | NS |
| Etiology of heart failure: | |||
| Ischaemic | 25 (69.4) | 12 (80.0) | NS |
| Non-ischaemic | 11 (30.6) | 3 (20.0) | NS |
| Past medical history: | |||
| Myocardial infarction | 24 (66.7) | 12 (80.0) | NS |
| Angioplasty | 18 (50.0) | 10 (66.7) | NS |
| Coronary artery bypass grafting | 6 (11.8) | 4 (26.7) | NS |
| Stroke | 1 (2.9) | 1 (6.7) | NS |
| Diabetes | 8 (22.2) | 4 (26.67) | NS |
| Hyperlipidaemia | 19 (52.8) | 8 (53.3) | NS |
| Functional status: | |||
| NYHA II | 32 (88.9) | 8 (53.3) | 0.009 |
| NYHA III | 4 (11.1) | 7 (46.7) | 0.009 |
| Heart rate variability: | |||
| SDNN [ms] | 118 ±30 | 124 ±32 | NS |
| Low frequency [ms2/Hz] | 532 ±601 | 339 ±211 | NS |
| High frequency [ms2/Hz] | 392 ±493 | 225 ±154 | NS |
| Low-to-high frequency ratio | 1.91 ±1.11 | 2.2 ±1.6 | NS |
| Heart rate turbulence: | |||
| Turbulence onset (%) | –1.51 ±3.12 | –1.31 ±1.13 | NS |
| Turbulence slope [ms/RR interval] | 9.04 ±10.29 | 5.43 ±5.01 | NS |
| Cardiopulmonary exercise test: | |||
| Peak VO2 [ml/kg/min] | 16.98 ±4.02 | 17.90 ±3.61 | NS |
| Treatment: | |||
| β-Blocker | 36 (100) | 15 (100) | NS |
| Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors | 32 (88.9) | 13 (86.7) | NS |
| Angiotensin receptor blockers | 4 (11.1) | 1 (6.7) | NS |
| Loop diuretics | 19 (52.8) | 8 (53.3) | NS |
| Aspirin | 29 (80.6) | 11 (73.3) | NS |
| Anticoagulants | 8 (22.2) | 4 (26.7) | NS |
| Statins | 28 (77.8) | 11 (73.3) | NS |
| Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator | 24 (66.7) | 9 (60.0) | NS |
Data presented are mean ± SD or n (%), NS – non-significant, NYHA – New York Heart Association class, SDNN – standard deviation of all normal RR intervals, peak VO2 – peak oxygen consumption.
Comparison of outcomes before and after telerehabilitation based on Nordic walking training in the training group (p1) and before and after observation in the control group (p2) and between groups – group × time adjusted for age and New York Heart Association class (p3)
| Parameter | Training group | Control group | Value of | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before training | After training | Value of | Before observation | After observation | Value of | ||
| SDNN [ms] | 118 ±30 | 119.5 ±31 | NS | 124 ±32 | 123 ±25 | NS | NS |
| LF [ms2/Hz] | 532 ±601 | 440 ±572 | NS | 339 ±211 | 699 ±1112 | NS | NS |
| HF [ms2/Hz] | 392 ±493 | 482 ±535 | NS | 225 ±154 | 386 ±540 | NS | NS |
| LF/HF | 1.91 ±1.11 | 1.07 ±0.63 | 0.0001 | 2.2 ±1.6 | 2.46 ±1.6 | NS | 0.0038 |
| TO (%) | –1.51 ±3.12 | –2.14 ±2.69 | NS | –1.31 ±1.13 | –1.99 ±1.50 | NS | NS |
| TS [ms/RR interval] | 9.04 ±10.29 | 8.88 ±7.16 | NS | 5.43 ±5.01 | 5.98 ±3.23 | NS | NS |
Data presented are mean values ± SD; statistical significance: p < 0.05; NS – non-significant, SDNN – standard deviation of all normal RR intervals; LF – low frequency, HF – high frequency; low-to-high frequency ratio; TO – turbulence onset, TS – turbulence slope.
Figure 1Changes in peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2) within training and control groups and between those groups
Figure 2Correlation between the change in peak oxygen consumption (Δpeak VO2) and the change in low-to-high frequency ratio (ΔLF/HF) in training group
Figure 3Correlation between the change in peak oxygen consumption (Δpeak VO2) and the change in low-to-high frequency ratio (ΔLF/HF) in control group