Literature DB >> 26787931

Advantages and limitations of potential methods for the analysis of bacteria in milk: a review.

Frederick Tawi Tabit1.   

Abstract

Contamination concerns in the dairy industry are motivated by outbreaks of disease in humans and the inability of thermal processes to eliminate bacteria completely in processed products. HACCP principles are an important tool used in the food industry to identify and control potential food safety hazards in order to meet customer demands and regulatory requirements. Milk testing is of importance to the milk industry regarding quality assurance and monitoring of processed products by researchers, manufacturers and regulatory agencies. Due to the availability of numerous methods used for analysing the microbial quality of milk in literature and differences in priorities of stakeholders, it is sometimes confusing to choose an appropriate method for a particular analysis. The objective of this paper is to review the advantages and disadvantages of selected techniques that can be used in the analysis of bacteria in milk. SSC, HRMA, REP, and RAPD are the top four techniques which are quick and cost-effective and possess adequate discriminatory power for the detection and profiling of bacteria. The following conclusions were arrived at during this review: HRMA, REP and RFLP are the techniques with the most reproducible results, and the techniques with the most discriminatory power are AFLP, PFGE and Raman Spectroscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analysis; Bacteria; Identification; Milk; PCR; Quantification

Year:  2015        PMID: 26787931      PMCID: PMC4711429          DOI: 10.1007/s13197-015-1993-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci Technol        ISSN: 0022-1155            Impact factor:   2.701


  59 in total

1.  Discriminatory power of RAPD, PCR-RFLP and southern blot analyses of ureCD or ureA gene probes on Helicobacter pylori isolates.

Authors:  Stella Smith; Franck Cantet; Fabrice Angelini; Armelle Marais; Francis Mégraud; Ekkhehard Bayerdöffer; Stephan Miehlke
Journal:  Z Naturforsch C J Biosci       Date:  2002 May-Jun

2.  Rapid identification of dairy lactic acid bacteria by M13-generated, RAPD-PCR fingerprint databases.

Authors:  Lia Rossetti; Giorgio Giraffa
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 3.  Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing.

Authors:  M J Espy; J R Uhl; L M Sloan; S P Buckwalter; M F Jones; E A Vetter; J D C Yao; N L Wengenack; J E Rosenblatt; F R Cockerill; T F Smith
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  High-resolution melting analysis (HRMA): more than just sequence variant screening.

Authors:  Rolf H A M Vossen; Emmelien Aten; Anja Roos; Johan T den Dunnen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Do milking practices influence the bacterial diversity of raw milk?

Authors:  Isabelle Verdier-Metz; Valérie Michel; Céline Delbès; Marie-Christine Montel
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 5.516

6.  Factors influencing the detection of bacterial cells using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): A quantitative review of published reports.

Authors:  Thierry Bouvier; Paul A Del Giorgio
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 4.194

7.  Evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic methods for subtyping Campylobacter jejuni isolates from humans, poultry, and cattle.

Authors:  E M Nielsen; J Engberg; V Fussing; L Petersen; C H Brogren; S L On
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Genetic heterogeneity in Bacillus sporothermodurans as demonstrated by ribotyping and repetitive extragenic palindromic-PCR fingerprinting.

Authors:  Olivier Guillaume-Gentil; Patsy Scheldeman; Joey Marugg; Lieve Herman; Han Joosten; Marc Heyndrickx
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Selective PCR detection of viable Enterobacter sakazakii cells utilizing propidium monoazide or ethidium bromide monoazide.

Authors:  D-M Cawthorn; R C Witthuhn
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.772

10.  High resolution melt analysis (HRMA); a viable alternative to agarose gel electrophoresis for mouse genotyping.

Authors:  Nicole Thomsen; Radiya G Ali; Jehangir N Ahmed; Ruth M Arkell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Trends and advances in food analysis by real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Nur Thaqifah Salihah; Mohammad Mosharraf Hossain; Hamadah Lubis; Minhaz Uddin Ahmed
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Genotyping and antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus uberis isolated from bovine clinical mastitis.

Authors:  Tiago Tomazi; Gustavo Freu; Bruna Gomes Alves; Antonio Francisco de Souza Filho; Marcos Bryan Heinemann; Marcos Veiga Dos Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Association of eNOS and MCP-1 Genetic Variants with Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetic Nephropathy Susceptibility: A Case-Control and Meta-Analysis Study.

Authors:  Priyanka Raina; Ruhi Sikka; Himanshu Gupta; Kawaljit Matharoo; Surinder Kumar Bali; Virinder Singh; Ajs Bhanwer
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 1.890

4.  Molecular Routes to Specific Identification of the Lactobacillus Casei Group at the Species, Subspecies and Strain Level.

Authors:  Piotr Jarocki; Elwira Komoń-Janczara; Agnieszka Glibowska; Michał Dworniczak; Monika Pytka; Agnieszka Korzeniowska-Kowal; Anna Wzorek; Monika Kordowska-Wiater
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Anisakid nematode species identification in harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) from the North Sea, Baltic Sea and North Atlantic using RFLP analysis.

Authors:  Jan Lakemeyer; Ursula Siebert; Amir Abdulmawjood; Kathrine A Ryeng; Lonneke L IJsseldijk; Kristina Lehnert
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.674

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.