Literature DB >> 26787788

Role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a risk-assessment method in patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery: a systematic review.

J Moran1, F Wilson2, E Guinan2, P McCormick3, J Hussey2, J Moriarty4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used as a preoperative risk-stratification tool for patients undergoing non-cardiopulmonary intra-abdominal surgery. Previous studies indicate that CPET may be beneficial, but research is needed to quantify CPET values protective against poor postoperative outcome [mortality, morbidity, and length of stay (LOS)].
METHODS: This systematic review aimed to assess the ability of CPET to predict postoperative outcome. The following databases were searched: PubMed, EMBASE, PEDro, The Cochrane Library, Cinahl, and AMED. Thirty-seven full-text articles were included. Data extraction included the following: author, patient characteristics, setting, surgery type, postoperative outcome measure, and CPET outcomes.
RESULTS: Surgeries reviewed were hepatic transplant and resection (n=7), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (n=5), colorectal (n=6), pancreatic (n=4), renal transplant (n=2), upper gastrointestinal (n=4), bariatric (n=2), and general intra-abdominal surgery (n=12). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing-derived cut-points, peak oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]), and anaerobic threshold (AT) predicted the following postoperative outcomes: 90 day-3 yr survival (AT 9-11 ml kg(-1) min(-1)) and intensive care unit admission (AT <9.9-11 ml kg(-1) min(-1)) after hepatic transplant and resection, 90 day survival after AAA repair ([Formula: see text] 15 ml kg(-1) min(-1)), LOS and morbidity after pancreatic surgery (AT <10-10.1 ml kg(-1) min(-1)), and mortality and morbidity after intra-abdominal surgery (AT 10.9 and <10.1 ml kg(-1) min(-1), respectively).
CONCLUSION: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is a useful preoperative risk-stratification tool that can predict postoperative outcome. Further research is needed to justify the ability of CPET to predict postoperative outcome in renal transplant, colorectal, upper gastrointestinal, and bariatric surgery.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exercise test/methods; general surgery; health status indicators; postoperative complications; preoperative care/methods; preoperative period; prognosis; risk; risk assessment/methods

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26787788     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aev454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  64 in total

1.  Physical decline and its implications in the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Linda O'Neill; Jonathan Moran; Emer M Guinan; John V Reynolds; Juliette Hussey
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 2.  Cardiopulmonary exercise testing-a beginner's guide to the nine-panel plot.

Authors:  D J Chambers; N A Wisely
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2019-03-20

3.  Comparison of Duke Activity Status Index with cardiopulmonary exercise testing in cancer patients.

Authors:  Michael H-G Li; Vladimir Bolshinsky; Hilmy Ismail; Kwok-Ming Ho; Alexander Heriot; Bernhard Riedel
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Muscle mass and physical recovery in ICU: innovations for targeting of nutrition and exercise.

Authors:  Paul E Wischmeyer; Zudin Puthucheary; Iñigo San Millán; Daniel Butz; Michael P W Grocott
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.687

5.  Surgery and functional mobility: doing the right thing at the right time.

Authors:  J Dronkers; B Witteman; N van Meeteren
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Multidisciplinary rehabilitation across the esophageal cancer journey.

Authors:  Linda O'Neill; Jenny Gannon; Emer Guinan; John V Reynolds; Juliette Hussey
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Surgical safety in radical cystectomy: the anesthetist's point of view-how to make a safe procedure safer.

Authors:  Dominique Engel; Marc A Furrer; Patrick Y Wuethrich; Lukas M Löffel
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Limited preoperative physical capacity continues to be associated with poor postoperative outcomes within a colorectal ERAS programme.

Authors:  E McLennan; R Oliphant; S J Moug
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Physiological performance and inflammatory markers as indicators of complications after oesophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  A G M T Powell; C Eley; T Abdelrahman; A H Coxon; C Chin; I Appadurai; R Davies; D M Bailey; W G Lewis
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-08-04

10.  Sarcopenia during neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal cancer: characterising the impact on muscle strength and physical performance.

Authors:  Emer M Guinan; S L Doyle; A E Bennett; L O'Neill; J Gannon; J A Elliott; J O'Sullivan; J V Reynolds; J Hussey
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.