Literature DB >> 26787675

MR appearance of normal uterine endometrium considering menstrual cycle: differentiation with benign and malignant endometrial lesions.

Fuki Shitano1, Aki Kido1, Masako Kataoka1, Koji Fujimoto1, Kayo Kiguchi1, Yasutaka Fushimi1, Ikuo Konishi2, Kaori Togashi1.   

Abstract

Background The thickness and signal intensity (SI) of normal uterine endometrium on T2-weighted (T2W) imaging changes depend on the menstrual cycle phase. Cases of normal endometrium that appear similar to endometrial lesions sometimes occur, and may result in misdiagnosis. Purpose To investigate normal endometrial appearance in luteal phase (LP) compared to that in follicular phase (FP), and to differentiate these appearances with those of endometrial lesions. Material and Methods Thirty-two normal volunteers prospectively underwent magnetic resonance (MR) examinations during LP and FP. Patients with pathologically confirmed endometrial polyps ( n = 9), hyperplasia ( n = 7), and cancer ( n = 15), who underwent MR examinations, were evaluated for comparison. Endometrial appearance was categorized into the following five types on sagittal T2W imaging and compared between LP, FP, and endometrial lesions: type 1, homogeneous higher SI; type 2, homogeneous iso SI; type 3, a bright midline and a peripheral iso SI layer; type 4, a lower/iso SI central line; and type 5, heterogeneous lower/iso SI. Endometrial thickness and SI were measured and also compared. Results Endometrial lesions were more frequently categorized as type 5 than normal endometrium ( P < 0.05). Endometrial thickness in LP (mean, 1.0 cm) was significantly greater than that in FP (0.6 cm), but not significantly different from polyps (1.1 cm), hyperplasia (1.0 cm), and cancer (0.9 cm). SI in FP was significantly higher than that in LP and that of all endometrial lesions. Conclusion Differentiation between normal endometrium in LP and endometrial lesions may be difficult based on thickness alone. Heterogeneous low SI may help to differentiate normal endometrium from endometrial lesions. Performing MR imaging during FP may also help due to higher SI of normal endometrium.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Uterine endometrium; endometrial lesions; luteal phase; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26787675     DOI: 10.1177/0284185115626478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  3 in total

1.  Effect of changes in the menstrual cycle and age on the signal intensity of amide proton transfer imaging in the normal uterus: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Ya-Qing Kong; Qian-Qian Qu; Lei Ming; Zhe Wang; Xiao-Tong Chi; Kai Deng
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-09-13

Review 2.  MRI of the endometrium - from normal appearances to rare pathology.

Authors:  Roxana Pintican; Vlad Bura; Marta Zerunian; Janette Smith; Helen Addley; Susan Freeman; Damiano Caruso; Andrea Laghi; Evis Sala; Mercedes Jimenez-Linan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 3.  Cross-sectional imaging of acute gynaecologic disorders: CT and MRI findings with differential diagnosis-part II: uterine emergencies and pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  Pietro Valerio Foti; Massimo Tonolini; Valeria Costanzo; Luca Mammino; Stefano Palmucci; Antonio Cianci; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre; Antonio Basile
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-12-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.