Literature DB >> 26787369

Tipping the scales: Evolution of the allometric slope independent of average trait size.

R Craig Stillwell1,2, Alexander W Shingleton3,4, Ian Dworkin4,5, W Anthony Frankino6.   

Abstract

The scaling of body parts is central to the expression of morphology across body sizes and to the generation of morphological diversity within and among species. Although patterns of scaling-relationship evolution have been well documented for over one hundred years, little is known regarding how selection acts to generate these patterns. In part, this is because it is unclear the extent to which the elements of log-linear scaling relationships-the intercept or mean trait size and the slope-can evolve independently. Here, using the wing-body size scaling relationship in Drosophila melanogaster as an empirical model, we use artificial selection to demonstrate that the slope of a morphological scaling relationship between an organ (the wing) and body size can evolve independently of mean organ or body size. We discuss our findings in the context of how selection likely operates on morphological scaling relationships in nature, the developmental basis for evolved changes in scaling, and the general approach of using individual-based selection experiments to study the expression and evolution of morphological scaling.
© 2016 The Author(s). Evolution © 2016 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allometry; constraint; morphological evolution; scaling; selection-artificial

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26787369     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  Why does allometry evolve so slowly?

Authors:  David Houle; Luke T Jones; Ryan Fortune; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

2.  Forest stratification shapes allometry and flight morphology of tropical butterflies.

Authors:  Sebastián Mena; Krzysztof M Kozak; Rafael E Cárdenas; María F Checa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Interspecific comparison of allometry between body weight and chest girth in domestic bovids.

Authors:  Hiroki Anzai; Kazato Oishi; Hajime Kumagai; Eiji Hosoi; Yoshitaka Nakanishi; Hiroyuki Hirooka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Conservative whole-organ scaling contrasts with highly labile suborgan scaling differences among compound eyes of closely related Formica ants.

Authors:  Craig D Perl; Sergio Rossoni; Jeremy E Niven
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Climate and symbioses with ants modulate leaf/stem scaling in epiphytes.

Authors:  Guillaume Chomicki; Susanne S Renner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The allometry of proboscis length in Melittidae (Hymenoptera: Apoidae) and an estimate of their foraging distance using museum collections.

Authors:  Annalie Melin; Harald W Krenn; Rauri C K Bowie; Colin M Beale; John C Manning; Jonathan F Colville
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Individual Cryptic Scaling Relationships and the Evolution of Animal Form.

Authors:  W Anthony Frankino; Eric Bakota; Ian Dworkin; Gerald S Wilkinson; Jason B Wolf; Alexander W Shingleton
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  Fitness consequences of artificial selection on relative male genital size.

Authors:  Isobel Booksmythe; Megan L Head; J Scott Keogh; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Multilevel analysis of dendroclimatic series with the R-package BIOdry.

Authors:  Wilson Lara; Stella Bogino; Felipe Bravo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Macroevolutionary integration of phenotypes within and across ant worker castes.

Authors:  Nicholas R Friedman; Beatrice Lecroq Bennet; Georg Fischer; Eli M Sarnat; Jen-Pan Huang; L Lacey Knowles Knowles; Evan P Economo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.