Literature DB >> 26786827

Clinical, Radiographic, and Surgical Presentation of Subscapularis Tendon Tears: A Retrospective Analysis of 139 Patients.

Micah Naimark1, Alan L Zhang1, Isabella Leon1, Andromahi Trivellas1, Brian T Feeley1, C Benjamin Ma2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze and correlate the clinical, radiographic, and surgical presentation of subscapularis (SSc) tears treated with arthroscopic repair.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified 455 patients who underwent rotator cuff tear repairs at our institution from 2010 to 2014. Of these patients, 139 underwent an SSc repair either in isolation or concurrently with other rotator cuff procedures. Tear size was classified arthroscopically by whether tears involved the superior one-third of the SSc tendon, superior two-thirds of the SSc tendon, or complete SSc tendon. Patient demographic characteristics, assessments of belly-press weakness and the lift-off test, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and data on concurrent supraspinatus and biceps tendon pathology were collected and analyzed according to tear size.
RESULTS: Our cohort had a mean age of 61.8 ± 12.5 years, with a male-female gender ratio of 1.7:1. There were 22 tears of the superior one-third of the SSc (16%), 96 tears of the superior two-thirds of the SSc (69%), and 21 complete SSc tears (15%). Overall, MRI diagnosis of SSc tears had a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 70%. MRI sensitivity was associated with tear severity (P = .02), with complete tears having an MRI sensitivity of 100%; superior two-thirds, 82%; and superior one-third, 67%. Physical examination sensitivity for belly-press weakness and the lift-off test was 61% and 63%, respectively, and did not correspond with tear size. Increased SSc tear size corresponded with a history of trauma (P = .04) and the presence of concurrent supraspinatus tears (P = .03) and biceps pathology (P = .003).
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of SSc tears remains challenging because of the limited sensitivity of MRI and physical examination. The diagnostic sensitivity of MRI is associated with SSc tear size, whereas physical examination is independent of tear size. Additional associations identified in this study include increased SSc tear size corresponding with a history of trauma, presence of concurrent supraspinatus tears, and presence of concurrent biceps tendon pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26786827     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  10 in total

1.  Orthopedic resident's learning curve for arthroscopic subscapularis tendon repair: short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Authors:  E Visonà; S Vio; G Franceschi; A Maron; K Corona; S Cerciello; G Merolla; A Berizzi; R Aldegheri
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-07-29

2.  A novel diagnostic method to predict subscapularis tendon tear with sagittal oblique view magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jae Woo Shim; Chae Hyun Pang; Seul Ki Min; Jeung Yeol Jeong; Jae Chul Yoo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in subscapularis tendon abnormalities and the importance of operator experience.

Authors:  Uğur Toprak; Sefa Türkoğlu; Çiğdem Aydoğan; Emrah Kovalak; Suzan Saylısoy; Duygu Sıddıkoğlu; Akkan Mahmud
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.511

4.  [Development of a risk stratification model for subscapularis tendon tear based on patient-specific data from 528 shoulder arthroscopy].

Authors:  Wennan Xu; Yaonan Zhang; Lei Shi; Fei Wang; Qingyun Xue
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-06-15

5.  Identifying key factors associated with subscapularis tendon tears and developing a risk prediction model to assist diagnosis.

Authors:  Wennan Xu; Fei Wang; Qingyun Xue
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 6.  Multi-modal imaging of the subscapularis muscle.

Authors:  Mona Alilet; Julien Behr; Jean-Philippe Nueffer; Benoit Barbier-Brion; Sébastien Aubry
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-10-17

7.  Simultaneous, Bilateral Acute Subscapularis Ruptures and Their Arthroscopic Management.

Authors:  Andrew M Schwartz; Jacob M Wilson; Kyle Hammond
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2019-04-28

8.  Arthroscopic Single Portal, Single Anchor Knotless Subscapularis Repair with Concomitant Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon.

Authors:  Joo Yeon Kim; Hee-Yon Park; Shane Rayos Del Sol; Stewart Bryant; Brandon Gardner; Moyukh O Chakrabarti; Steven Perinovic; Patrick J McGahan; James L Chen
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-03-22

9.  Evaluation of subscapularis tendon tears of the anterosuperior aspect using radial-sequence magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ryosuke Matsushita; Shin Yokoya; Hiroshi Negi; Norimasa Matsubara; Yuji Akiyama; Nobuo Adachi
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-09-28

10.  Subscapularis tendon tears: Management and arthroscopic repair.

Authors:  Brett A Lenart; Jonathan B Ticker
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-12-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.