| Literature DB >> 26786709 |
Ali Keles1, Aliye Kamalak2, Cangül Keskin1, Merve Akçay3, İsmail Uzun1.
Abstract
This study aims to compare the efficacy of different irrigation activation methods to remove smear layer and debris from oval-shaped root canals following retreatment. Ninety mandibular canines with oval-shaped root canals were selected. Retreatment was performed with R-Endo retreatment files. The samples were randomly divided into six groups (n = 15). Groups were assigned according to agitation technique: R-Endo with classic irrigation, with self-adjustable file, with passive ultrasonic irrigation, R-Endo + Er:YAG, R-Endo + PIPS and R-Endo + Nd:YAG. Compared with the classic irrigation (R-Endo + CI) group, all other groups were more successful in reducing smear layer and debris (P < 0.05). The least amount of residual smear layer and debris was detected in the Er:YAG laser group (P < 0.05). Additional use of different agitation methods contributes to removal of debris and smear layer following root canal filling removal with rotary instruments; however, none of the techniques tested render root canal walls completely free of smear layer or debris.Entities:
Keywords: Er:YAG laser; Nd:YAG laser; PIPS laser; SAF; retreatment; ultrasonic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26786709 DOI: 10.1111/aej.12145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aust Endod J ISSN: 1329-1947 Impact factor: 1.659