Literature DB >> 26786676

Accuracy and re-test reliability of mobile eye-tracking in Parkinson's disease and older adults.

S Stuart1, L Alcock2, A Godfrey2, S Lord2, L Rochester2, B Galna2.   

Abstract

Mobile eye-tracking is important for understanding the role of vision during real-world tasks in older adults (OA) and people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, accuracy and reliability of such devices have not been established in these populations. We used a novel protocol to quantify accuracy and reliability of a mobile eye-tracker in OA and PD. A mobile eye-tracker (Dikablis) measured the saccade amplitudes of 20 OA and 14 PD on two occasions. Participants made saccades between targets placed 5°, 10° and 15° apart. Impact of visual correction (glasses) on saccadic amplitude measurement was also investigated in 10 OA. Saccade amplitude accuracy (median bias) was -1.21° but a wide range of bias (-7.73° to 5.81°) was seen in OA and PD, with large vertical saccades (15°) being least accurate. Reliability assessment showed a median difference between sessions of <1° for both groups, with poor to good relative agreement (Spearman rho: 0.14 to 0.85). Greater accuracy and reliability was observed in people without visual correction. Saccade amplitude can be measured with variable accuracy and reliability using a mobile eye-tracker in OA and PD. Human, technological and study-specific protocol factors may introduce error and are discussed along with methodological recommendations.
Copyright © 2015 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Mobile eye-tracking; Parkinson's disease; Reliability; Saccades; Walking

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26786676     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  4 in total

1.  Patients with chronic peripheral vestibular hypofunction compared to healthy subjects exhibit differences in gaze and gait behaviour when walking on stairs and ramps.

Authors:  Jaap Swanenburg; Edith Bäbler; Rolf Adelsberger; Dominik Straumann; Eling D de Bruin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Do you see what I see? Mobile eye-tracker contextual analysis and inter-rater reliability.

Authors:  S Stuart; D Hunt; J Nell; A Godfrey; J M Hausdorff; L Rochester; L Alcock
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Validation of a velocity-based algorithm to quantify saccades during walking and turning in mild traumatic brain injury and healthy controls.

Authors:  Samuel Stuart; Lucy Parrington; Douglas Martini; Bryana Popa; Peter C Fino; Laurie A King
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 4.  The Measurement of Eye Movements in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Structured Review of an Emerging Area.

Authors:  Samuel Stuart; Lucy Parrington; Douglas Martini; Robert Peterka; James Chesnutt; Laurie King
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-01-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.