Literature DB >> 26786125

Evaluation of the effectiveness of BACTEC MGIT 960 for the detection of mycobacteria in Bangladesh.

Mehedi Hasan1, Saurab Kishore Munshi2, Mst Sabiha Banu Momi3, Farjana Rahman4, Rashed Noor5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Tuberculosis (TB) caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis has been identified as a re-emerging infectious disease with public health importance globally. Exploitation of new laboratory techniques for precise identification of mycobacteria in clinical specimens is of great importance to improve the diagnosis as part of the global TB control efforts.
METHODS: The current study was conducted for the evaluation of BACTEC MGIT 960 method in comparison with Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture and light emitting diode (LED) fluorescence microscopy for isolation of mycobacteria among TB suspects from Bangladesh. A total of 421 specimens were tested with these methods.
RESULTS: Among the tested samples, 3.6% (n=15) were LED fluorescence microscopy positive; while 18 (4.2%) and 45 (10.6%) were recovered from LJ and MGIT 960 culture. The relative positivity found through MGIT 960 system were 60% and 66.7% higher than that of LJ culture and LED fluorescence microscopy, respectively. Recovery rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex ([MTC], 21 by MGIT and 16 by LJ culture) and non-tubercular mycobacteria ([NTM], 24 by MGIT and 2 by LJ culture) by MGIT 960 was 24% and 96% greater, respectively than LJ culture. Moreover, MGIT 960 was found to be highly sensitive (100%), specific (93.3%), accurate (93.6%) and a more rapid method in detecting mycobacteria when compared with LJ culture.
CONCLUSION: Extended recovery of NTM and MTC through MGIT 960 urged frequent application of this method to detect mycobacteria more effectively and rapidly.
Copyright © 2013 Asian-African Society for Mycobacteriology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BACTEC MGIT 960; Light emitting diode (LED) fluorescence microscopy; Lowenstein–Jensen culture; Mycobacteria; Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTM); Non-tubercular mycobacteria (NTM)

Year:  2013        PMID: 26786125     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2013.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mycobacteriol        ISSN: 2212-5531


  6 in total

1.  Expect the Unexpected: Mycobacterial Infection in Post Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

Authors:  Vikram Kishor Kandhari; Mohan M Desai; Roshan N Wade; Surendar S Bava
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

2.  Detecting tuberculosis in pregnant and postpartum women in Eswatini.

Authors:  Munyaradzi Pasipamire; Edward Broughton; Mandzisi Mkhontfo; Gugu Maphalala; Batsabile Simelane-Vilane; Samson Haumba
Journal:  Afr J Lab Med       Date:  2020-07-30

Review 3.  Improved Conventional and New Approaches in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Baoyu Dong; Zhiqun He; Yuqing Li; Xinyue Xu; Chuan Wang; Jumei Zeng
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 4.  Diagnosis of active tuberculosis disease: From microscopy to molecular techniques.

Authors:  Adam J Caulfield; Nancy L Wengenack
Journal:  J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis       Date:  2016-05-25

5.  T CELL EPITOPES OF THE ESXA FULL GENE OF MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS FROM SPUTUM OF MDR-TB PATIENTS.

Authors:  Desak Nyoman Surya Suameitria Dewi; Ni Made Mertaniasih
Journal:  Afr J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-06-18

6.  Comprehensive Determination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Nontuberculous Mycobacteria From Targeted Capture Sequencing.

Authors:  Ya He; Ziying Gong; Xiaokai Zhao; Daoyun Zhang; Zhongshun Zhang
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.293

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.