Evan A Tseros1, Val Gebski1,2, Gary J Morgan3, Michael J Veness4,5. 1. Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2. NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 3. Head and Neck Cancer Service, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 4. Head and Neck Cancer Service, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. michael.veness@health.nsw.gov.au. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. michael.veness@health.nsw.gov.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prognostic variables in patients with metastatic cutaneous nodal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are well documented; however, the relationship between lymph node ratio (LNR) and outcome is not well researched. LNR represents the ratio of positive lymph nodes to total excised lymph nodes. We analyzed the correlation between LNR and outcome in patients who have undergone surgery for metastatic cutaneous nodal SCC of the head and neck. METHODS: Analysis was performed on retrospectively collected data, identifying patients who underwent surgery at Westmead Hospital, Sydney. Pathology reports were reviewed to ascertain LNR. A log-rank test identified a specific LNR value to compare time to disease progression (TTDP) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate proportional hazard regression models were used to review outcome. RESULTS: In total, 193 males and 45 females with a median of age 68 years were identified, with a mean recorded LNR of 0.15. On multivariate analysis, an LNR cutpoint of 0.21 was a significant predictor of decreased TTDP [hazard ratio (HR) 2.34, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.40-0.49; p = 0.009] and OS (HR 2.75, 95 % CI 1.57-4.82; p < 0.001). Forty-nine of 238 patients (21 %) developed recurrence, with most recurrences being regional (29 of 49; 59 %). A total of 17 % of patients with an LNR ≤0.21 recurred compared with 40 % for patients with an LNR >0.21. CONCLUSIONS: LNR is potentially an independent predictor of outcome in patients with metastatic cutaneous nodal SCC. The clinical relevance of this finding requires further validation.
BACKGROUND: The prognostic variables in patients with metastatic cutaneous nodal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are well documented; however, the relationship between lymph node ratio (LNR) and outcome is not well researched. LNR represents the ratio of positive lymph nodes to total excised lymph nodes. We analyzed the correlation between LNR and outcome in patients who have undergone surgery for metastatic cutaneous nodal SCC of the head and neck. METHODS: Analysis was performed on retrospectively collected data, identifying patients who underwent surgery at Westmead Hospital, Sydney. Pathology reports were reviewed to ascertain LNR. A log-rank test identified a specific LNR value to compare time to disease progression (TTDP) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate proportional hazard regression models were used to review outcome. RESULTS: In total, 193 males and 45 females with a median of age 68 years were identified, with a mean recorded LNR of 0.15. On multivariate analysis, an LNR cutpoint of 0.21 was a significant predictor of decreased TTDP [hazard ratio (HR) 2.34, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.40-0.49; p = 0.009] and OS (HR 2.75, 95 % CI 1.57-4.82; p < 0.001). Forty-nine of 238 patients (21 %) developed recurrence, with most recurrences being regional (29 of 49; 59 %). A total of 17 % of patients with an LNR ≤0.21 recurred compared with 40 % for patients with an LNR >0.21. CONCLUSIONS: LNR is potentially an independent predictor of outcome in patients with metastatic cutaneous nodal SCC. The clinical relevance of this finding requires further validation.
Authors: Bram van Leer; Alet J G Leus; Boukje A C van Dijk; Marloes S van Kester; Gyorgy B Halmos; Gilles F H Diercks; Bert van der Vegt; Jeroen Vister; Emoke Rácz; Boudewijn E C Plaat Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-05-30 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Matthew Fox; Marc Brown; Nicholas Golda; Dori Goldberg; Christopher Miller; Melissa Pugliano-Mauro; Chrysalyne Schmults; Thuzar Shin; Thomas Stasko; Yaohui G Xu; Kishwer Nehal Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2018-09-15 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Axel Sahovaler; Rohin J Krishnan; David H Yeh; Qi Zhou; David Palma; Kevin Fung; John Yoo; Anthony Nichols; S Danielle MacNeil Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Joshua Lubov; Mathilde Labbé; Krystelle Sioufi; Grégoire B Morand; Michael P Hier; Manish Khanna; Khalil Sultanem; Alex M Mlynarek Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2021-09-07
Authors: Guilherme Rabinowits; Michael R Migden; Todd E Schlesinger; Robert L Ferris; Morganna Freeman; Valerie Guild; Shlomo Koyfman; Anna C Pavlick; Neil Swanson; Gregory T Wolf; Scott M Dinehart Journal: JID Innov Date: 2021-08-25