Literature DB >> 26785502

Agreement of BMI-Based Equations and DXA in Determining Body-Fat Percentage in Adults With Down Syndrome.

Michael R Esco1, Brett S Nickerson, Sara C Bicard, Angela R Russell, Phillip A Bishop.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate measurements of body-fat percentage (BF%) in 4 body-mass-index- (BMI) -based equations and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). Ten male and 10 female adults with DS volunteered for this study. Four regression equations for estimating BF% based on BMI previously developed by Deurenberg et al. (DE(BMI-BF%)), Gallagher et al. (GA(BMI-BF%)), Womersley & Durnin (WO(BMI-BF%)), and Jackson et al. (JA(BMI-BF%)) were compared with DXA. There was no significant difference (p = .659) in mean BF% values between JA(BMI-BF%) (BF% = 40.80% ± 6.3%) and DXA (39.90% ± 11.1%), while DE(BMI-BF%) (34.40% ± 9.0%), WO(BMI-BF%) (35.10% ± 9.4%), and GA(BMI-BF%) (35.10% ± 9.4%) were significantly (p < .001) lower. The limits of agreement (1.96 SD of the constant error) varied from 9.80% to 16.20%. Therefore, BMI-based BF% equations should not be used in individuals with DS.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26785502     DOI: 10.1123/APAQ.2014-0240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adapt Phys Activ Q        ISSN: 0736-5829            Impact factor:   2.929


  1 in total

1.  Is body mass index (BMI) or body adiposity index (BAI) a better indicator to estimate body fat and selected cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with intellectual disabilities?

Authors:  Anna Zwierzchowska; Diana Celebańska; Barbara Rosołek; Krystyna Gawlik; Aleksandra Żebrowska
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.298

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.