Literature DB >> 26784974

Regional variations in cholecystectomy rates in Sweden: impact on complications of gallstone disease.

Rozh Noel1, Urban Arnelo1, Lars Enochsson1, Lars Lundell1, Magnus Nilsson1, Gabriel Sandblom1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There are considerable variations in cholecystectomy rates between countries, but it remains unsettled whether high cholecystectomy rates prevent future gallstone complications by reducing the gallstone prevalence. The aims of this study were to investigate the regional differences in cholecystectomy rates and their relation to the incidence of gallstone complications.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nation-wide registry-based study of the total number of cholecystectomies in Sweden between 1998 and 2013. Data were obtained from the Swedish Inpatient Registry covering the entire population and subdivided for by the 21 different counties. Indications for the procedure were prospectively collected during the years 2006-2013 in the National Registry for Gallstone Surgery and ERCP. The detailed demography of the total number of patients undergoing cholecystectomy and its relation to the respective indications were analysed by linear regression.
RESULTS: The annual rates of cholecystectomy in the Swedish counties ranged from 100 to 207 per 100,000 inhabitants, with a mean of 157 (95% CI 145-169). The majority of cholecystectomies were done in females based on the indication biliary colic, with a peak incidence in younger ages. Cholecystectomies performed due to gallstone complications, pancreatitis and cholecystitis, were mainly carried out in the older age groups. No significant relationship could be demonstrated between cholecystectomy rates in the different regions and the respective incidences of gallstone complications.
CONCLUSIONS: There are wide regional variations in cholecystectomy rates in Sweden. The present study does not give support that frequent use of cholecystectomy in uncomplicated gallstone disease prevents future gallstone complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholecystectomy; cholecystitis; gallstones; pancreatitis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26784974     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1111935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  4 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol).

Authors:  P R de Reuver; A H van Dijk; S Z Wennmacker; M P Lamberts; D Boerma; B L den Oudsten; M G W Dijkgraaf; S C Donkervoort; J A Roukema; G P Westert; J P H Drenth; C J H van Laarhoven; M A Boermeester
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Intra-operative gallbladder scoring predicts conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a WSES prospective collaborative study.

Authors:  Michael Sugrue; Federico Coccolini; Magda Bucholc; Alison Johnston
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Cholecystectomy Risk in Crohn's Disease Patients After Ileal Resection: a Long-term Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jorn C Goet; Evelien M J Beelen; Katharina E Biermann; Annette H Gijsbers; W Rudolph Schouten; C Janneke van der Woude; Annemarie C de Vries
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Regional variations in the treatment of gallstone disease may affect patient outcome: a large, population-based register study in sweden.

Authors:  Lisa Lindqvist; Gabriel Sandblom; Pär Nordin; Oskar Hemmingsson; Lars Enochsson
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.360

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.