Casey Crump1, Jan Sundquist2, Marilyn A Winkleby3, Kristina Sundquist2. 1. Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 2. Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. 3. Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: High body mass index (BMI) and low physical fitness are risk factors for hypertension, but their interactive effects are unknown. Elucidation of interactions between these modifiable risk factors may help inform more effective interventions in susceptible subgroups. OBJECTIVE: To determine the interactive effects of BMI and physical fitness on the risk of hypertension in a large national cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included all 1,547,189 military conscripts in Sweden from January 1, 1969, through December 31, 1997 (97%-98% of all 18-year-old men nationwide each year), who were followed up through December 31, 2012 (maximum age, 62 years). Data analysis was conducted August 1 through August 15, 2015. EXPOSURES: Standardized aerobic capacity, muscular strength, and BMI measurements obtained at a military conscription examination. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hypertension identified from outpatient and inpatient diagnoses. RESULTS: A total of 93,035 men (6.0%) were diagnosed with hypertension in 39.7 million person-years of follow-up. High BMI and low aerobic capacity (but not muscular strength) were associated with increased risk of hypertension, independent of family history and socioeconomic factors (BMI, overweight or obese vs normal: incidence rate ratio, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.46-2.55; P < .001; aerobic capacity, lowest vs highest tertile: incidence rate ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.47-1.54; P < .001). Aerobic capacity was inversely associated with hypertension across its full distribution (incidence rate ratio per 100 W, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71; P < .001). A combination of high BMI (overweight or obese vs normal) and low aerobic capacity (lowest vs highest tertile) was associated with the highest risk of hypertension (incidence rate ratio, 3.53; 95% CI, 3.41-3.66; P < .001) and had a negative additive and multiplicative interaction (P < .001). Although high BMI was a significant risk factor for hypertension, low aerobic capacity also was a significant risk factor among those with normal BMI. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this large national cohort study, high BMI and low aerobic capacity in late adolescence were associated with higher risk of hypertension in adulthood. If confirmed, our findings suggest that interventions to prevent hypertension should begin early in life and include not only weight control but aerobic fitness, even among persons with normal BMI.
IMPORTANCE: High body mass index (BMI) and low physical fitness are risk factors for hypertension, but their interactive effects are unknown. Elucidation of interactions between these modifiable risk factors may help inform more effective interventions in susceptible subgroups. OBJECTIVE: To determine the interactive effects of BMI and physical fitness on the risk of hypertension in a large national cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included all 1,547,189 military conscripts in Sweden from January 1, 1969, through December 31, 1997 (97%-98% of all 18-year-old men nationwide each year), who were followed up through December 31, 2012 (maximum age, 62 years). Data analysis was conducted August 1 through August 15, 2015. EXPOSURES: Standardized aerobic capacity, muscular strength, and BMI measurements obtained at a military conscription examination. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hypertension identified from outpatient and inpatient diagnoses. RESULTS: A total of 93,035 men (6.0%) were diagnosed with hypertension in 39.7 million person-years of follow-up. High BMI and low aerobic capacity (but not muscular strength) were associated with increased risk of hypertension, independent of family history and socioeconomic factors (BMI, overweight or obese vs normal: incidence rate ratio, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.46-2.55; P < .001; aerobic capacity, lowest vs highest tertile: incidence rate ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.47-1.54; P < .001). Aerobic capacity was inversely associated with hypertension across its full distribution (incidence rate ratio per 100 W, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71; P < .001). A combination of high BMI (overweight or obese vs normal) and low aerobic capacity (lowest vs highest tertile) was associated with the highest risk of hypertension (incidence rate ratio, 3.53; 95% CI, 3.41-3.66; P < .001) and had a negative additive and multiplicative interaction (P < .001). Although high BMI was a significant risk factor for hypertension, low aerobic capacity also was a significant risk factor among those with normal BMI. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this large national cohort study, high BMI and low aerobic capacity in late adolescence were associated with higher risk of hypertension in adulthood. If confirmed, our findings suggest that interventions to prevent hypertension should begin early in life and include not only weight control but aerobic fitness, even among persons with normal BMI.
Authors: Jonathan Myers; Paul McAuley; Carl J Lavie; Jean-Pierre Despres; Ross Arena; Peter Kokkinos Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2014-09-28 Impact factor: 8.194
Authors: David R Buys; Virginia J Howard; Leslie A McClure; Katie Crawford Buys; Patricia Sawyer; Richard M Allman; Emily B Levitan Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Damon L Swift; Carl J Lavie; Neil M Johannsen; Ross Arena; Conrad P Earnest; James H O'Keefe; Richard V Milani; Steven N Blair; Timothy S Church Journal: Circ J Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 2.993
Authors: Thomas Semlitsch; Klaus Jeitler; Lars G Hemkens; Karl Horvath; Eva Nagele; Christoph Schuermann; Nicole Pignitter; Kirsten H Herrmann; Siw Waffenschmidt; Andrea Siebenhofer Journal: Sports Med Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Carl J Lavie; Paul A McAuley; Timothy S Church; Richard V Milani; Steven N Blair Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Pamela J Stoddard; Barbara A Laraia; E Margaret Warton; Howard H Moffet; Nancy E Adler; Dean Schillinger; Andrew J Karter Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Stephen P Juraschek; Michael J Blaha; Seamus P Whelton; Roger Blumenthal; Steven R Jones; Steven J Keteyian; John Schairer; Clinton A Brawner; Mouaz H Al-Mallah Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Pontus Henriksson; Hanna Henriksson; Per Tynelius; Daniel Berglind; Marie Löf; I-Min Lee; Eric J Shiroma; Francisco B Ortega Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Carmen R Isasi; Garrett M Strizich; Robert Kaplan; Martha L Daviglus; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Denise C Vidot; Maria M Llabre; Gregory Talavera; Mercedes R Carnethon Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Robert M Carey; David A Calhoun; George L Bakris; Robert D Brook; Stacie L Daugherty; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Brent M Egan; John M Flack; Samuel S Gidding; Eric Judd; Daniel T Lackland; Cheryl L Laffer; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Steven M Smith; Sandra J Taler; Stephen C Textor; Tanya N Turan; William B White Journal: Hypertension Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Yide Yang; Patrick Wc Lau; Jingjing Wang; Bin Dong; Lijing Wu; Binh Quach; Del P Wong; Lianguo Fu; Jun Ma; Haijun Wang Journal: Hypertens Res Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 3.872