Literature DB >> 26784739

Dermoscopic clues to differentiate facial lentigo maligna from pigmented actinic keratosis.

A Lallas1, P Tschandl2, A Kyrgidis1, W Stolz3, H Rabinovitz4, A Cameron5, J Y Gourhant6, J Giacomel7, H Kittler2, J Muir8, G Argenziano9, R Hofmann-Wellenhof10, I Zalaudek10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dermoscopy is limited in differentiating accurately between pigmented lentigo maligna (LM) and pigmented actinic keratosis (PAK). This might be related to the fact that most studies have focused on pigmented criteria only, without considering additional recognizable features.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of established dermoscopic criteria for pigmented LM and PAK, but including in the evaluation features previously associated with nonpigmented facial actinic keratosis.
METHODS: Retrospectively enrolled cases of histopathologically diagnosed LM, PAK and solar lentigo/early seborrhoeic keratosis (SL/SK) were dermoscopically evaluated for the presence of predefined criteria. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed and receiver operating characteristic curves were used.
RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 70 LMs, 56 PAKs and 18 SL/SKs. In a multivariate analysis, the most potent predictors of LM were grey rhomboids (sixfold increased probability of LM), nonevident follicles (fourfold) and intense pigmentation (twofold). In contrast, white circles, scales and red colour were significantly correlated with PAK, posing a 14-fold, eightfold and fourfold probability for PAK, respectively. The absence of evident follicles also represented a frequent LM criterion, characterizing 71% of LMs.
CONCLUSIONS: White and evident follicles, scales and red colour represent significant diagnostic clues for PAK. Conversely, intense pigmentation and grey rhomboidal lines appear highly suggestive of LM.
© 2015 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26784739     DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  8 in total

1.  [Dermoscopically conspiciuous pigmented lesion on the forehead of a young male patient].

Authors:  C Menzer; W Stolz; M Nilles; F Toberer; C Fink; H A Haenssle
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  A tiny facial pigmented macule: overcoming the diagnostic challenge.

Authors:  Athanasios J Stefanis; Zoe Apalla; Chryssoula Papageorgiou; Dimitrios Ioannides; Christina Nikolaidou; Aimilios Lallas
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2018-10-31

Review 3.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopy of Actinic Keratosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Karla L Valdés-Morales; María Luisa Peralta-Pedrero; Fermín Jurado-Santa Cruz; Martha Alejandra Morales-Sánchez
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2020-10-26

4.  Frequency of Publication of Dermoscopic Images in Inter-observer Studies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sam Polesie; Oscar Zaar
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 5.  Enhancing Skin Cancer Diagnosis with Dermoscopy.

Authors:  Zachary J Wolner; Oriol Yélamos; Konstantinos Liopyris; Tova Rogers; Michael A Marchetti; Ashfaq A Marghoob
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.478

6.  Difficult-to-diagnose facial melanomas: Utility of reflectance confocal microscopy in uncovering the diagnosis.

Authors:  Lucy L Chen; Alon Scope; Nathalie De Carvalho; Harold S Rabinovitz; Giovanni Pellacani
Journal:  JAAD Case Rep       Date:  2017-08-12

Review 7.  Actinic Keratosis and Non-Invasive Diagnostic Techniques: An Update.

Authors:  Alice Casari; Johanna Chester; Giovanni Pellacani
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2018-01-08

Review 8.  Dermatoscopy of Neoplastic Skin Lesions: Recent Advances, Updates, and Revisions.

Authors:  Philipp Weber; Philipp Tschandl; Christoph Sinz; Harald Kittler
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-09-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.