OBJECTIVE: We present the rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for aggression in children and adolescents, which is conducted in response to the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) approach initiative. Specifically, the study is focused on the brain-behavior associations within the RDoC construct of frustrative non-reward. On the behavioral level, this construct is defined by reactions elicited in response to withdrawal or prevention of reward, most notably reactive aggression. This study is designed to test the functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) and electrophysiological (EEG) correlates of aggression and its reduction after CBT. METHODS:Eighty children and adolescents with high levels of aggression across multiple traditional diagnostic categories, ages 8-16, will be randomly assigned to receive 12 sessions of CBT or 12 sessions of supportive psychotherapy. Clinical outcomes will be measured by the ratings of aggressive behavior collected at baseline, midpoint, and endpoint evaluations, and by the Improvement Score of the Clinical Global Impressions Scale assigned by an independent evaluator (blinded rater). Subjects will also perform a frustration-induction Go-NoGo task and a task of emotional face perception during fMRI scanning and EEG recording at baseline and endpoint. RESULTS: Consistent with the NIMH strategic research priorities, if functional neuroimaging and EEG variables can identify subjects who respond to CBT for aggression, this can provide a neuroscience-based classification scheme that will improve treatment outcomes for children and adolescents with aggressive behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Demonstrating that a change in the key nodes of the emotion regulation circuitry is associated with a reduction of reactive aggression will provide evidence to support the validity of the frustrative non-reward construct.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We present the rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for aggression in children and adolescents, which is conducted in response to the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) approach initiative. Specifically, the study is focused on the brain-behavior associations within the RDoC construct of frustrative non-reward. On the behavioral level, this construct is defined by reactions elicited in response to withdrawal or prevention of reward, most notably reactive aggression. This study is designed to test the functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) and electrophysiological (EEG) correlates of aggression and its reduction after CBT. METHODS: Eighty children and adolescents with high levels of aggression across multiple traditional diagnostic categories, ages 8-16, will be randomly assigned to receive 12 sessions of CBT or 12 sessions of supportive psychotherapy. Clinical outcomes will be measured by the ratings of aggressive behavior collected at baseline, midpoint, and endpoint evaluations, and by the Improvement Score of the Clinical Global Impressions Scale assigned by an independent evaluator (blinded rater). Subjects will also perform a frustration-induction Go-NoGo task and a task of emotional face perception during fMRI scanning and EEG recording at baseline and endpoint. RESULTS: Consistent with the NIMH strategic research priorities, if functional neuroimaging and EEG variables can identify subjects who respond to CBT for aggression, this can provide a neuroscience-based classification scheme that will improve treatment outcomes for children and adolescents with aggressive behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Demonstrating that a change in the key nodes of the emotion regulation circuitry is associated with a reduction of reactive aggression will provide evidence to support the validity of the frustrative non-reward construct.
Authors: Sara J Webb; Emily J H Jones; Kristen Merkle; Michael Murias; Jessica Greenson; Todd Richards; Elizabeth Aylward; Geraldine Dawson Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: Philipp Sterzer; Christina Stadler; Annette Krebs; Andreas Kleinschmidt; Fritz Poustka Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-01-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Sabine C Herpertz; Thomas Huebner; Ivo Marx; Timo D Vloet; Gereon R Fink; Tony Stoecker; N Jon Shah; Kerstin Konrad; Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Alan S Lewis; Gerrit Ian van Schalkwyk; Mayra Ortiz Lopez; Fred R Volkmar; Marina R Picciotto; Denis G Sukhodolsky Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2018-08
Authors: Karim Ibrahim; Carla Kalvin; Simon Morand-Beaulieu; George He; Kevin A Pelphrey; Gregory McCarthy; Denis G Sukhodolsky Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2022-10-08 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Y J Daniel Yang; Denis G Sukhodolsky; Jiedi Lei; Eran Dayan; Kevin A Pelphrey; Pamela Ventola Journal: J Neurodev Disord Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 4.025