Literature DB >> 2678420

Accuracy of alginate and elastomeric impression materials.

A Peutzfeldt1, E Asmussen.   

Abstract

The accuracy of three alginates and seven elastomeric impression materials was determined. Impressions were taken of a truncated cone and poured with stone die. A steel ring fitting the steel cone was placed on the dies, and the discrepancy between the top surface of the ring and the die was measured. From these measurements the deviation between the base diameter of the die and that of the cone was calculated and used to express the accuracy of an impression material. All impressions showed a net shrinkage, resulting in too large a die stone and incomplete seating of the steel ring. The inaccuracy of the alginates varied between 44 and 188 microns. Blueprint regular was found to be significantly more accurate than the two other alginates investigated, and had a degree of accuracy comparable with that of the more accurate elastomeric impression materials. Within this group of materials the inaccuracy varied between 39 and 130 microns. Generally, the addition-curing silicones were more accurate than the polyethers. Baysilex and President regular body had the highest degree of accuracy of the elastomeric impression materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2678420     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1989.tb01626.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Dent Res        ISSN: 0029-845X


  3 in total

1.  The effect of pouring time on the dimensional accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.

Authors:  Supneet Singh Wadhwa; Richa Mehta; Nidhi Duggal; Kamlesh Vasudeva
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2013-07

2.  Comparison of the surface roughness of gypsum models constructed using various impression materials and gypsum products.

Authors:  Yi-Chih Chang; Chien-Hung Yu; Wen-Miin Liang; Ming-Gene Tu; San-Yue Chen
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.080

3.  Extra-Oral Three-Dimensional (3D) Scanning Evaluation of Three Different Impression Materials-An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Eugen S Bud; Vlad I Bocanet; Mircea H Muntean; Alexandru Vlasa; Mariana Păcurar; Irina Nicoleta Zetu; Bianca I Soporan; Anamaria Bud
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.967

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.