| Literature DB >> 26784109 |
Peng Sun1,2, Huimin Yan2, Sushant M Ranadive2, Abbi D Lane3,2, Rebecca M Kappus3,2, Kanokwan Bunsawat3,2, Tracy Baynard3,2, Min Hu4, Shichang Li1, Bo Fernhall3,2.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Caucasian populations have a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) when compared with their Chinese counterparts and CVD is associated with autonomic function. It is unknown whether autonomic function during exercise recovery differs between Caucasians and Chinese. The present study investigated autonomic recovery following an acute bout of treadmill exercise in healthy Caucasians and Chinese. Sixty-two participants (30 Caucasian and 32 Chinese, 50% male) performed an acute bout of treadmill exercise at 70% of heart rate reserve. Heart rate variability (HRV) and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) were obtained during 5-min epochs at pre-exercise, 30-min, and 60-min post-exercise. HRV was assessed using frequency [natural logarithm of high (LnHF) and low frequency (LnLF) powers, normalized high (nHF) and low frequency (nLF) powers, and LF/HF ratio] and time domains [Root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), natural logarithm of RMSSD (LnRMSSD) and R-R interval (RRI)]. Spontaneous BRS included both up-up and down-down sequences. At pre-exercise, no group differences were observed for any HR, HRV and BRS parameters. During exercise recovery, significant race-by-time interactions were observed for LnHF, nHF, nLF, LF/HF, LnRMSSD, RRI, HR, and BRS (up-up). The declines in LnHF, nHF, RMSSD, RRI and BRS (up-up) and the increases in LF/HF, nLF and HR were blunted in Chinese when compared to Caucasians from pre-exercise to 30-min to 60-min post-exercise. Chinese exhibited delayed autonomic recovery following an acute bout of treadmill exercise. This delayed autonomic recovery may result from greater sympathetic dominance and extended vagal withdrawal in Chinese. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Register ChiCTR-IPR-15006684.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26784109 PMCID: PMC4718672 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1CONSORT Flow diagram.
Participants characteristics.
| Variables | Caucasian (n = 30) | Chinese (n = 32) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, yr | 24±4 | 28±4 | < 0.001 |
| Body mass, kg | 68±9 | 62±10 | 0.013 |
| Height, cm | 172±10 | 165±8 | 0.004 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.1±2.5 | 22.5±2.6 | 0.295 |
| VO2peak, ml/(kg·min) | 47.0±9.6 | 43.3±6.3 | 0.086 |
| Heart rate at rest, beats /min | 64±13 | 68±11 | 0.174 |
| Maximum heart rate, beats/min | 193±10 | 195±8 | 0.360 |
| Target heart rate, beats /min | 154±10 | 157±8 | 0.116 |
| Carotid artery intima-media thickness, mm | 0.40±0.46 | 0.40±0.05 | 0.683 |
Values are means ±SE; n, No. of participants.
Frequency domain measures of heart rate variability at baseline and recovery following exercise in Caucasian and Chinese.
| Variables | Pre exercise | Post 30-min | Post 60-min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LnTP, ms2 | ||||
| Caucasian | 8.07±0.91 | 7.34±1.23 | 7.95±0.95 | |
| Chinese | 7.95±1.31 | 6.47±1.27 | 7.39±1.16 | |
| LnHF, ms2 | ||||
| Caucasian | 6.36±1.29 | 5.52±1.67 | 6.28±1.38 | |
| Chinese | 6.31±1.78 | 3.98±1.97 | 5.36±1.73 | |
| LnLF, ms2 | ||||
| Caucasian | 6.83±0.94 | 6.29±1.27 | 6.88±1.02 | |
| Chinese | 6.63±1.48 | 5.22±1.37 | 6.14±1.41 | |
| nHF, % | ||||
| Caucasian | 0.38±0.14 | 0.32±0.15 | 0.36±0.16 | |
| Chinese | 0.43±0.2 | 0.26±0.16 | 0.33±0.16 | |
| nLF, % | ||||
| Caucasian | 0.60±0.15 | 0.65±0.17 | 0.62±0.16 | |
| Chinese | 0.55±0.2 | 0.72±0.18 | 0.65±0.17 | |
| LF/ HF | ||||
| Caucasian | 192±115 | 292±226 | 233±168 | |
| Chinese | 192±194 | 517±528 | 296±257 |
LnTP, natural logarithm of total power; LnHF, natural logarithm of high frequency; LnLF, natural logarithm of low frequency; nHF, normalized HF; nLF, normalized LF.
*P<0.05, significant difference from pre-exercise to 30-min and 60-min after exercise between Caucasians and Chinese.
Δ P<0.05, significant difference from pre-exercise to 30-min and 60-min.
# P<0.05, significant difference between Caucasians and Chinese.
Fig 2Change value from baseline for (a) LnHF, natural logarithm of high frequency (b) nHF, normalized high frequency (c) nLF, normalized low frequency (d) LF/HF, LF/ HF ratio (e) LnRMSSD, natural logarithm of RMSSD (f) HR, heart rate (g) BRS(up-up), Baroreflex sensitivity up-up, at 30-min and 60-min after exercise.
Data are reported as mean ± SE (#significant race-by-time interaction; *significant change compared with baseline).
Time domain measures of heart rate variability at baseline and recovery following exercise in Caucasian and Chinese.
| Variables | Pre exercise | Post 30-min | Post 60-min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-RI, ms | ||||
| Caucasian | 963±209 | 820±175 | 873±170 | |
| Chinese | 899±128 | 712±978 | 791±117 | |
| HR, beats/min | ||||
| Caucasian | 64±13 | 78±14 | 70±12 | |
| Chinese | 68±11 | 87±10 | 77±13 | |
| RMSSD, ms | ||||
| Caucasian | 64.84±47.34 | 43.48±36.41 | 59.84±49.78 | |
| Chinese | 69.47±90.9 | 17.87±15.42 | 40.3±38.5 | |
| LnRMSSD, ms | ||||
| Caucasian | 3.94±0.71 | 3.41±0.93 | 3.82±0.75 | |
| Chinese | 3.81±0.9 | 2.55±0.87 | 3.3±0.96 | |
| BF, Hz | ||||
| Caucasian | 0.26±0.09 | 0.3±0.09 | 0.28±0.08 | |
| Chinese | 0.27±0.07 | 0.31±0.08 | 0.27±0.07 |
R-RI, R-R interval; HR, heart rate; RMSSD, Square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences between adjacent NN intervals; LnRMSSD, natural logarithm of RMSSD; BF, breathing frequency.
*P<0.05, significant difference from pre-exercise to 30-min and 60-min after exercise between Caucasians and Chinese.
Δ P<0.05, significant difference from pre-exercise to 30-min and 60-min.
# P<0.05, significant difference between Caucasians and Chinese.
Fig 3Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) determined by the sequence method, pre and 30-min and 60-min post exercise in Caucasian and Chinese individuals.
(a) BRS(up-up) showed a significant race by time interaction. *P<0.05 (b) There was no race-by-time interaction for the change in BRS(dn-dn).