Liu Yi Lin1,2, Jaime E Sidani1,2, Ariel Shensa1,2, Ana Radovic3,4, Elizabeth Miller3,4, Jason B Colditz1,2, Beth L Hoffman1,2, Leila M Giles1,2, Brian A Primack1,2,3. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Center for Research on Media, Technology, and Health, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social media (SM) use is increasing among U.S. young adults, and its association with mental well-being remains unclear. This study assessed the association between SM use and depression in a nationally representative sample of young adults. METHODS: We surveyed 1,787 adults ages 19 to 32 about SM use and depression. Participants were recruited via random digit dialing and address-based sampling. SM use was assessed by self-reported total time per day spent on SM, visits per week, and a global frequency score based on the Pew Internet Research Questionnaire. Depression was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Scale Short Form. Chi-squared tests and ordered logistic regressions were performed with sample weights. RESULTS: The weighted sample was 50.3% female and 57.5% White. Compared to those in the lowest quartile of total time per day spent on SM, participants in the highest quartile had significantly increased odds of depression (AOR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.14-2.42) after controlling for all covariates. Compared with those in the lowest quartile, individuals in the highest quartile of SM site visits per week and those with a higher global frequency score had significantly increased odds of depression (AOR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.86-4.04; AOR = 3.05, 95% CI = 2.03-4.59, respectively). All associations between independent variables and depression had strong, linear, dose-response trends. Results were robust to all sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: SM use was significantly associated with increased depression. Given the proliferation of SM, identifying the mechanisms and direction of this association is critical for informing interventions that address SM use and depression.
BACKGROUND: Social media (SM) use is increasing among U.S. young adults, and its association with mental well-being remains unclear. This study assessed the association between SM use and depression in a nationally representative sample of young adults. METHODS: We surveyed 1,787 adults ages 19 to 32 about SM use and depression. Participants were recruited via random digit dialing and address-based sampling. SM use was assessed by self-reported total time per day spent on SM, visits per week, and a global frequency score based on the Pew Internet Research Questionnaire. Depression was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Scale Short Form. Chi-squared tests and ordered logistic regressions were performed with sample weights. RESULTS: The weighted sample was 50.3% female and 57.5% White. Compared to those in the lowest quartile of total time per day spent on SM, participants in the highest quartile had significantly increased odds of depression (AOR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.14-2.42) after controlling for all covariates. Compared with those in the lowest quartile, individuals in the highest quartile of SM site visits per week and those with a higher global frequency score had significantly increased odds of depression (AOR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.86-4.04; AOR = 3.05, 95% CI = 2.03-4.59, respectively). All associations between independent variables and depression had strong, linear, dose-response trends. Results were robust to all sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: SM use was significantly associated with increased depression. Given the proliferation of SM, identifying the mechanisms and direction of this association is critical for informing interventions that address SM use and depression.
Authors: Laura Andrade; Jorge J Caraveo-Anduaga; Patricia Berglund; Rob V Bijl; Ron De Graaf; Wilma Vollebergh; Eva Dragomirecka; Robert Kohn; Martin Keller; Ronald C Kessler; Norito Kawakami; Cengiz Kiliç; David Offord; T Bedirhan Ustun; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2003 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Megan A Moreno; Lauren A Jelenchick; Katie G Egan; Elizabeth Cox; Henry Young; Kerry E Gannon; Tara Becker Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Michael F Green; William P Horan; Junghee Lee; Amanda McCleery; L Felice Reddy; Jonathan K Wynn Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Joseph Firth; John Torous; Brendon Stubbs; Josh A Firth; Genevieve Z Steiner; Lee Smith; Mario Alvarez-Jimenez; John Gleeson; Davy Vancampfort; Christopher J Armitage; Jerome Sarris Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Bruno P C Smirmaul; Regina Fumanti Chamon; Fabiano Moulin de Moraes; Gabriel Rozin; Annie Seixas Bello Moreira; Roberto de Almeida; Sley Tanigawa Guimarães Journal: Am J Lifestyle Med Date: 2020-08-25
Authors: Ariel Shensa; César G Escobar-Viera; Jaime E Sidani; Nicholas D Bowman; Michael P Marshal; Brian A Primack Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Jacquelynn R Jones; Jason B Colditz; Ariel Shensa; Jaime E Sidani; Liu Yi Lin; Martha Ann Terry; Brian A Primack Journal: Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw Date: 2016-10