Literature DB >> 26783692

Three-dimensional kinematics of competitive and recreational cyclists across different workloads during cycling.

Rodrigo R Bini1, Frederico Dagnese2, Emmanuel Rocha3, Mateus C Silveira2, Felipe P Carpes2,3, Carlos B Mota3.   

Abstract

Although the link between sagittal plane motion and exercise intensity has been highlighted, no study assessed if different workloads lead to changes in three-dimensional cycling kinematics. This study compared three-dimensional joint and segment kinematics between competitive and recreational road cyclists across different workloads. Twenty-four road male cyclists (12 competitive and 12 recreational) underwent an incremental workload test to determine aerobic peak power output. In a following session, cyclists performed four trials at sub-maximal workloads (65, 75, 85 and 95% of their aerobic peak power output) at 90 rpm of pedalling cadence. Mean hip adduction, thigh rotation, shank rotation, pelvis inclination (latero-lateral and anterior-posterior), spine inclination and rotation were computed at the power section of the crank cycle (12 o'clock to 6 o'clock crank positions) using three-dimensional kinematics. Greater lateral spine inclination (p < .01, 5-16%, effect sizes = 0.09-0.25) and larger spine rotation (p < .01, 16-29%, effect sizes = 0.31-0.70) were observed for recreational cyclists than competitive cyclists across workload trials. No differences in segment and joint angles were observed from changes in workload with significant individual effects on spine inclination (p < .01). No workload effects were found in segment angles but differences, although small, existed when comparing competitive road to recreational cyclists. When conducting assessment of joint and segment motions, workload between 65 and 95% of individual cyclists' peak power output could be used.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D analysis; biomechanics; injury & prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26783692     DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2015.1135984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci        ISSN: 1536-7290            Impact factor:   4.050


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of Three-Dimensional Trunk Kinematics and Muscle Activation during Cycling with Independent Cranks.

Authors:  Eric Bourdon; Matthew Mavor; Dean C Hay
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Shoulder and thorax kinematics contribute to increased power output of competitive handcyclists.

Authors:  Benjamin Stone; Barry S Mason; Martin B Warner; Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.221

3.  Changes in the Trunk and Lower Extremity Kinematics Due to Fatigue Can Predispose to Chronic Injuries in Cycling.

Authors:  Alberto Galindo-Martínez; Alejandro López-Valenciano; Carlos Albaladejo-García; Juan M Vallés-González; Jose L L Elvira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Discomfort, pain and fatigue levels of 160 cyclists after a kinematic bike-fitting method: an experimental study.

Authors:  Robson Dias Scoz; Cesar Ferreira Amorim; Thiago Espindola; Mateus Santiago; Jose Joao Baltazar Mendes; Paulo Rui de Oliveira; Luciano Maia Alves Ferreira; Romulo Nolasco Brito
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-08-30

5.  Cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance.

Authors:  Haeun Yum; Hyang Kim; Taeyong Lee; Moon Seok Park; Seung Yeol Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.