Literature DB >> 26783509

Identification and in silico analysis of cattle DExH/D box RNA helicases.

Manish Kumar Suthar1, Mukul Purva1, Sunil Maherchandani1, Sudhir Kumar Kashyap1.   

Abstract

The helicases are motor proteins participating in a range of nucleic acid metabolisms. RNA helicase families are characterized by the presence of conserved motifs. This article reports a comprehensive in silico analysis of Bos taurus DExH/D helicase members. Bovine helicases were identified using the helicase domain sequences including 38 DDX (DEAD box) and 16 DHX (DEAH box) members. Signature motifs were used for the validation of these proteins. Putative sub cellular localization and phylogenetic relationship for these RNA helicases were established. Comparative analysis of these proteins with human DDX and DHX members was carried out. These bovine helicase have been assigned putative physiological functions. Present study of cattle DExH/D helicase will provides an invaluable source for the detailed biochemical and physiological research on these members.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioinformatics; Bos taurus; Bovine; DEAD box; RNA helicases

Year:  2016        PMID: 26783509      PMCID: PMC4705078          DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1640-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Springerplus        ISSN: 2193-1801


Background

A fundamental cellular action of RNA helicases is to unwind nucleic acid duplexes and thus, they are required for different cellular processes involving RNA. Among these helicases several members perform their functions in pre-mRNA processing and ribosome biogenesis (Linder 2006). The DEAD and DEAH are the subgroups of the DExH/D family (Staley and Guthrie 1998). The DDX code is used for DEAD box and DHX is used for DEAH box. The basis of nomenclature of these DExH/D helicases is the composition of conserved amino acids in their motif II. DEAD-box and DEAH-box, helicases have D-E-A-D (Asp, Glu, Ala and Asp) and D-E-A-H (Asp, Glu, Ala and His) amino acids respectively at this motif. These proteins have role in RNA metabolism viz. transcription, translation, RNA editing and folding, nuclear transport, RNA degradation and RNA-ribosomal complex formations (Linder and Daugeron 2000; Patel and Donmez 2006). These helicases belong to superfamily 2 (SF2) of the six super families in which all the helicases have been classified (Caruthers and McKay 2002; Tanner and Linder 2001). DExD/H-box proteins have been reported from all the living organisms (Umate et al. 2011; Tuteja and Tuteja 2004a, 2004b; Hartung et al. 2000). The core of these enzymes contains two RecA-like domains separated by a short linker. The N-terminal and C-terminal domains are designated as DEAD-domain and helicase domain respectively (Cordin et al. 2006; Pyle 2008). These domains participate in RNA (substrate) binding and ATP hydrolysis. Alignments of the protein sequences obtained from various organisms have revealed nine highly conserved motifs in DEAD-box proteins (Q, I, Ia, Ib, and II–VI) and eight in DEAH-box proteins I, Ia, Ib, II, III, IV, V and VI (Tuteja and Tuteja 2004a, 2004b; Tanner et al. 2003). Among these motifs, motif II (or Walker B motif) along with motif I (or Walker A motif) and Q-motif are necessary for ATP binding and hydrolysis (Tanner et al. 2003) whereas, motifs Ia, Ib, II, IV and V may be involved in RNA binding (Svitkin et al. 2001). Genome sequencing of variety of organisms have revealed the presence of different numbers of DExH/D helicases. In a genome-wide comparative study 161, 149, 136 and 213 different RNA helicase genes have been identified in Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Zea mays and Glycine max respectively (Xu et al. 2013). Also, 31 DEAD and 14 DEAH putative RNA helicases have been reported from human beings (Umate et al. 2011). Recently, Steimer and Klostermeier summarised involvement of RNA helicases in infection and diseases (Steimer and Klostermeier 2012). For example dysregulation of these helicases has been linked to a wide variety of cancers. In addition, these proteins have a role in the replication of viruses such as Foot and mouth disease virus infection in cattle and HIV virus in human beings. RNA helicases A (DHX9) has been associated with cattle FMD disease (Radi et al. 2012; Lawrence and Rieder 2009). We can reveal prognostic and diagnostic markers and identify potential drug targets by characterizing these helicases. Cattle are economically important domesticated ungulates. Phylogenetic analysis has shown a distant clad for cattle as compared to humans and rodents (Murphy et al. 2004) and around 800 breeds have been established serving as resource for the genetics of complex traits studies. The genome sequence for domesticated cattle (Bos taurus) was assembled and published in 2009 (The Bovine Genome Sequencing and Analysis Consortium 2009). The sequence reveals presence of a minimum 22,000 genes in cattle. In the present study, sequenced cattle genome was used to evaluate the number of DEAD-box and related family proteins which might be present, along with their phylogeny. The composition of these bovine motor proteins have also been analysed. In silico analysis of bovine DExH/D helicases provided the putative role of these proteins in various RNA metabolism processes which might be operating in Bos taurus.

Methods

Database search and enlistment of RNA helicases

The sequences for DExH/D family members encoded by Bos taurus were downloaded from NCBI/BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.nih.gov). Amino acid sequence of eIF4A1 (Swiss-Prot Id-Q3SZ54) was obtained first from Swiss-Prot using the key words eIF4A1 Bos taurus. The input sequence so obtained was used in the Cow RefSeq protein database available at NCBI/BLAST home. The cow genome sequences were searched using program BLASTP-Compare protein sequence against ‘BLAST Cow sequences’ resource. Finally tentative lists of DExH/D family members were compiled and all proteins (DExH/D family members) were assigned unique Swiss-Prot IDs, protein names and gene names. After identification of bovine RNA helicases their phylogenetic analysis was carried out along with helicases of other animals of veterinary importance like horse, pig and sheep. For this key words DEAD and DEAH helicase along with animal name were used to download homologs from pig, horse and sheep from Swiss-Prot database for phylogenetic analysis of these DExH/D helicases vis a vis bovine helicases. The amino acid sequences of both families of RNA helicases were aligned and the neighbour-joining method in MEGA 5.0 was applied to examine their evolutionary relationship (Tamura et al. 2011). Specific sequences of Bos taurus were used for BLASTP search against human homologs as described above to compare their homology. Protein sequences were validated by the presence of signature motifs. Predictive molecular weight and isoelectric point for the RNA helicases were calculated from Sequence Manipulating Suite (http://www.bioinformatics.org/sms2/). Protein localization was studied using WoLF PSORT (http://www.genscript.com/psort/wolf_psort.html) program.

Motif identification and phylogenetic analysis

The signature motifs for the protein family were identified. Protein sequences of DEAD and DEAH members were first aligned using ClustalW2 program available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/ and alignment files were downloaded. Conserved motifs in bovine DExH/D were also identified using the MEME suite (version 4.9.1) at meme.nbcr.net/meme/cgi-bin/meme.cgi. Finally list of signature motifs was generated. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGA5 program (http://www.megasoftware.net/) by the Neighbour-Joining method (NJ) with parameters; complete deletion option, p-distance and bootstrapping method with 1000 replicates (Tamura et al. 2011). Final image was obtained using the MEGA5 program. Domain analysis was performed using the program Scan Prosite (http://expasy.org) and these domain structures were used in the figures.

Results and discussion

Identification and validation of Bos taurus DExH/D family members

Genomes of all organisms have genes encoding RNA helicases. Although various comprehensive analyses of these helicases are available in various organisms, limited studies have been conducted on the role of RNA helicases in cattle. The studies of biological function of cattle RNA helicases can unravel their roles and can help in understanding different diseases in cattle and also help in improving economically important traits. Fifty four DExH/D family members of RNA helicases were identified in Bos taurus in the present study, amongst which 38 members belonged to DDX family (DEAD) (Table 1) and 16 members to DHX family (DEAH) of RNA helicases (Table 2). Further analysis of cattle helicase sequences with MEME suite suggested the pattern of amino acids occurrence in signature motifs validating the protein family members. Besides characteristic residues of motifs, some residues were found to be conserved around each motif of various DExH/D family members. The 38 bovine DDX members identified were DDX1, DDX3X, DDX3Y, DDX4, DDX5, DDX6, DDX10, DDX17, DDX18, DDX19A, DDX19B, DDX20, DDX21, DDX23, DDX24, DDX25, DDX27, DDX28, DDX31, DDX39A, DDX39B, DDX41, DDX42, DDX43, DDX46, DDX47, DDX49, DDX50, DDX51, DDX52, DDX53, DDX54, DDX55, DDX56, DDX59, eIF4AI, eIF4AII and eIF4AIII (Table 1). In all, 9 motifs (Q, I, Ia, Ib, II, III, IV, V and VI) were identified in these proteins which are shown in Fig. 1. The signature motifs in DDX protein showed consensus sequences as GFxxPxxIQ (Q), AxxGxGKT (I), PTRELA (Ia), TPGR (Ib), DExD (II), SAT (III), FVxT (IV), RGxD (V) and HRxGRxxR (VI). In the case of DDX49 three motifs namely; TPGR, DExD and SAT were found missing (Fig. 1). The 16 DHX members that could be identified were DHX8, DHX9, DHX15, DHX16, DHX29, DHX30, DHX32, DHX33, DHX34, DHX35, DHX36, DHX37, DHX38, DHX40, DHX57 and DHX58 (Fig. 2). Consensus sequences GxxGxGKT (I), TQPRRV (Ia), TDGML (Ib), DExH (II), SAT (III), FLTG (IV), TNIAET (V) and QRxGRAGR (VI) were found in the members of DHX proteins. Some motifs in two DHX members i.e. DHX32 and DHX58 were not found (Fig. 2). In protein DHX32, SAT, TNIAET and QRxGRAGR motifs were absent, and instead of motif DExH; DDIH motif was observed. In DHX58 conserved motif DECH was observed and remaining motifs were missing. QRxGRAGR motif was not observed in the DHX38 protein (Fig. 2). Four members i.e. DHX32, DHX58, DHX38, and DDX49 showed variable conserved motifs and need biochemical evidence for confirmation. Figure 3 describes patterns in different motifs of DDX and DHX helicases using Hidden Markov Model (HMM). In Fig 3a, b position specific probability is represented by the size of particular amino acid residue in different motifs, larger the size more will be probability of occurrence.
Table 1

Summary of the features of the Bovine DDX member proteins

Bos TaurusHumanIsoelectric pointMolecular weight (kDa)Localization% Coverage with human% Identity with human
DDX1DDX17.2382.43C,N10097
DDX3XDDX3X7.273.15N10099
DDX3YDDX3Y Isoform27.3973.17N10091
DDX4DDX4 Isoform15.9679.46N,C10091
DDX5Dead box polypeptide 59.2169.16N100100
DDX6DDX68.9354.39N9999
DDX10DDX109.17101.18N10089
DDX17DDX17 Isoform18.7572.33N,C10099
DDX18X1DDX1810.0475.13N,M10090
DDX19ADDX19A6.7254.00C,N,10097
DDX19BDDX19B Isoform18.5454.46M,N,C9598
DDX20Dead box polypeptide 206.7792.71N,C10088
DDX23DDX2310.2295.67N10099
DDX24DDX2410.0194.53N10081
DDX25DDX256.3354.63C,N10093
DDX27DDX279.8987.10N10095
DDX28DDX2810.7560.02M,C,N9985
DDX31DDX3110.4380.87N9979
DDX39ADDX39A5.3949.15C,N10096
DDX39BDDX39B5.3848.97C,N10099
DDX41DDX416.9469.83C,N,M10099
DDX42DDX427.28107.56N,C9695
DDX43Dead box polypeptide 438.7772.04N9976
DDX46DDX46 IsoformX19.87117.46N,C10099
DDX47DDX47 IsoformX19.6450.92N10096
DDX49DDX499.8244.39C,N,M9991
DDX50Dead box polypeptide 509.6482.60N,C10097
DDX51DDX517.5660.69N,C9882
DDX52DDX5210.3267.52N,C10091
DDX53DDX539.8868.47N9968
DDX54DDX5410.68102.72N9490
DDX55DDX559.8368.61N,C10094
DDX56DDX56 Isoform19.0261.27N,C,M10093
DDX59DDX598.0367.45N,C10077
EIF4AIEIF4AI Isoform15.1246.15N100100
EIF4AIIEIF4AII5.1346.41N100100
EIF4A-IIIEIF4A-III6.6946.85N,M10099
Nucleolar RNA Hel2Isoform1(DDX21)9.8787.25N,C10089

N, M and C represent Nuclear, Mitochondrial and Cytoplasmic localization, respectively

Table 2

Summary of the features of the Bovine DHX member proteins

Bos Taurus HumanIsoelectric PointMolecular weight (kDa)Localization% Coverage with human% Identity with human
DHX8DHX88.33140.28N9998
DHX9Helicase A6.88141.97N9095
DHX15DHX157.4890.95N10099
DHX16DHX16 Iso16.39119.88N,C10098
DHX29DHX298.67155.28N9993
DHX30DHX30 Iso18.61135.97M,C,N10097
DHX32DHX324.7983.88C,N10089
DHX33DHX32 Iso19.2379.75N,C9892
DHX34DHX347.96128.80N,C10088
DHX35DHX35 Iso18.6678.89N9996
DHX36DHX36 Iso17.87114.85N,M10092
DHX37DHX378.93129.02N,C,M10085
DHX38PRP166.55140.19N10095
DHX40DHX40 Iso18.8388.52N,C10099
DHX57DHX577.69155.76N,C9691
DHX58DHX588.6377.19C,N10083

N, M and C represent Nuclear, Mitochondrial and Cytoplasmic localization, respectively

Fig. 1

The amino acid sequence of conserved motifs constituting the RNA helicases of bovine DDX proteins

Fig. 2

The amino acid sequence of conserved motifs constituting the RNA helicases of bovine DHX proteins

Fig. 3

The schematic diagram of motifs of DExH/D helicases. a and b represent motifs for bovine DEAD and DEAH proteins respectively. The schematic diagrams were derived from MEME suite and generated automatically by Meme software based on scores

Summary of the features of the Bovine DDX member proteins N, M and C represent Nuclear, Mitochondrial and Cytoplasmic localization, respectively Summary of the features of the Bovine DHX member proteins N, M and C represent Nuclear, Mitochondrial and Cytoplasmic localization, respectively The amino acid sequence of conserved motifs constituting the RNA helicases of bovine DDX proteins The amino acid sequence of conserved motifs constituting the RNA helicases of bovine DHX proteins The schematic diagram of motifs of DExH/D helicases. a and b represent motifs for bovine DEAD and DEAH proteins respectively. The schematic diagrams were derived from MEME suite and generated automatically by Meme software based on scores

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic analysis of DExH/D helicases was performed to elucidate evolutionary relationship. On analysing bovine helicase with that of horse, pig and sheep (Fig. 4a, b) it was observed that some DEAD box helicase family members could be subdivided into nine subgroups in all the species taken into consideration. However, DDX 6, DDX 10, DDX 11, DDX 24, DDX 26, DDX 27, DDX28, DDX 31, DDX 41, DDX 47, DDX49, DDX 51, DDX52, DDX 54, DDX 55, DDX 56, DDX58 and DDX 59 members of DEAD box of all these species could not be included in above nine subgroups (Fig. 4a). Similarly, DHX family members could also be subdivided into four subgroups for all the species (Fig. 4b). However, DHX15, DHX32 and DHX40 could not be included in the any of these four subgroups (Fig. 4b). The extent of similarity indicates toward conserved structure of DExH/D helicases in all the species studied during evolution but their functions remained to be defined by biochemical analysis. In second analysis, relationship amongst bovine helicases was carried out (Fig. 5a, b for DDX and DHX respectively). Phylogenetic analysis established close relationship between different members. The closely related members within DDX subfamily are DDX17-DDX5, DDX43-DDX53, DDX42-DDX46, DDX4-DDX3X-DDX3Y, DDX41-DDX59, DDX39A-DDX39B, DDX19A-DDX19B, EIF4A members, DDX10-DDX18, DDX56-DDX51, DDX47-DDX49, DDX27-DDX54 and DDX50-DDX21. Similarly, within DHX members DHX8-DHX16, DHX33-DHX35, DHX15-DHX32 and DHX36-DHX57 show close relationship. All these members occur as separate clades.
Fig. 4

Phylogenetic analysis of RNA helicases from cattle, pig, horse and sheep. a and b represent DEAD box and DEAH box helicases from four species respectively. DEAD and DEAH amino acid sequences were aligned with ClustalW, and phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbour joining method in MEGA 5.0 software

Fig. 5

Phylogenetic analysis of Bovine DExH/D helicases. a and b represent analysis of bovine DEAD and DEAH respectively

Phylogenetic analysis of RNA helicases from cattle, pig, horse and sheep. a and b represent DEAD box and DEAH box helicases from four species respectively. DEAD and DEAH amino acid sequences were aligned with ClustalW, and phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbour joining method in MEGA 5.0 software Phylogenetic analysis of Bovine DExH/D helicases. a and b represent analysis of bovine DEAD and DEAH respectively

In Silico Characterization of Bovine DExH/D family members

Putative molecular weights and isoelectric points of bovine DExH helicases were determined in silico (Tables 1 and 2). Similarly predictive subcellular localizations of these proteins were examined (Tables 1 and 2). These helicases varied in their isoelectric point and molecular subunit mass. Isoelectric point of DDX members varied from 5.12 (EIF4AI) to 10.68 (DDX54) whereas pI for DHX members ranged between 4.79 (DHX32) and 9.23 (DHX33). 24 DDX and 8 DHX members had pI above 8. Molecular mass for these helicases ranged between 44.39 kDa (DDX49) and 117.46 kDa (DDX46) in case of DDX members and between 77.19 kDa (DHX58) and 155.76 kDa (DHX57) for DHX members. The predictive pI value and molecular mass will help in isolation and purification leading to further characterization of these helicases. Analysis with WoLF PSORT program indicated that cattle RNA helicases are localized in the nucleus, cytoplasm and mitochondria (Tables 1 and 2).

Comparative analysis of human and bovine DExH/D family members and putative function assignment

Bos taurus has a 2.86 billion bp long genome with a minimum of 22,000 genes (The Bovine Genome Sequencing and Analysis Consortium 2009). Similarly, 2.91 billion bp long human genome has around 20,000–25,000 genes (International Human Genome Sequencing C 2004). Cattle genome encodes all orthologs of human DExH/D family members. Bovine DEAD box RNA helicases has typically Q motif, ATP binding and Helicase C-terminal domains as found in human helicases. Domain structures of bovine DExH/D RNA helicases as compared with that of human helicases indicated high similarity between the two species (Figs. 6 and 7). Despite this identity DDX17, DDX18, DDX24, DDX27, DDX31, DDX42, DDX49, DDX51, DDX53 and DDX54 show difference in positions of domains as compared to human helicases (Fig. 6). In bovine DDX49 typically overlapping of ATP binding and Helicase domain was observed. Interestingly, both bovine and human DHX32 showed only ATP binding domain and no other domain was observed. Further, levels of homology amongst human and bovine DExH/D RNA helicases are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Bovine DEAD helicases showed high similarity with their human counterpart (identity 76–100 %).
Fig. 6

Schematic diagrams of domain organisation in bovine DEAD helicases. Domain analysis was conducted using Scan Prosite (http://expasy.org). The domain structures were downloaded and used for figure generations. The number shown in black and red colour indicates the amino acids spanning motifs in bovine and Human DEAD box proteins

Fig. 7

Schematic diagrams of domain organisation in bovine DEAH helicases. Domain analysis was conducted using Scan Prosite (http://expasy.org). The domain structures were downloaded and used for figure generations. The number shown in black and red colour indicates the amino acids spanning motifs in bovine and Human DEAH box proteins

Schematic diagrams of domain organisation in bovine DEAD helicases. Domain analysis was conducted using Scan Prosite (http://expasy.org). The domain structures were downloaded and used for figure generations. The number shown in black and red colour indicates the amino acids spanning motifs in bovine and Human DEAD box proteins Schematic diagrams of domain organisation in bovine DEAH helicases. Domain analysis was conducted using Scan Prosite (http://expasy.org). The domain structures were downloaded and used for figure generations. The number shown in black and red colour indicates the amino acids spanning motifs in bovine and Human DEAH box proteins The higher similarity of these bovine helicases with well characterized human helicases can help to predict their functions in cattle developmental processes also. The putative functions of these helicases have been summarized in Tables 3 and 4. The importance of DExH/D RNA helicases in environmental stress is becoming evident (Shih and Lee 2014). DDX1, 3, 5, 6, 17, 21, 24, 47, DHX9 and DHX36 are associated with various viral infections. Similarly DDX6 and DDX19 are associated with neurological disorders, as summarised previously (Steimer and Klostermeier 2012). This manuscript presents first report on genome-wide comprehensive analysis of bovine DExH/D helicases providing valuable information regarding classification and putative function of these RNA helicases, essential for growth and development. Identification of bovine counterparts of helicases associated with various stress and diseases can be exploited as prognostic and diagnostic markers.
Table 3

Putative functions of DDX members

ProteinFunctionRef.
DDX1Associated with ARE mediated mRNA decayChou et al. (2013)
DDX3X, DDX3YDDX3X can bind with DNA, RNA splicing, nuclear transport of RNA and translational regulationFranca et al. (2007); Rosner and Rinkevich (2007)
DDX4Bovine vasa homolog (BVH) and is expressed in gonadsBartholomew and Parks (2007)
DDX5, DDX17Splicing and transcriptional regulationAuboeuf et al. (2002)
DDX6Spermatogenesis and localized in spermatogenic cellsKawahara et al. (2014)
DDX10Ribosome assemblySavitsky et al. (1996)
DDX18Hematopoiesis and deletion resulted into p-53 depended cell arrest in G1Payne et al. (2011)
DDX19m-RNA nuclear transport by remodelling of RNP particles through nuclear pore complexCollins et al. (2009)
DDX20Transcriptional regulation, splicing process and mi-RNA pathwayTakata et al. (2012)
DDX23Pre-mRNA splicingIsmaïli et al. (2001)
DDX24Innate immune signalling regulationMa et al. (2013)
DDX25Posttranscriptional regulations of genes for spermatid elongation & completion of spermatogenesisDufau and Tsai-Morris (2007)
DDX27ND
DDX28Cellular divisionLoo et al. (2012)
DDX31Transcription of rRNA gene and assembly of 60 s ribosomal subunitBish and Vogel (2014)
DDX39mRNA splicing, genome integrity and telomere protectionYoo and Chung (2011)
DDX41Type 1 interferon responseZhang et al. (2011a)
DDX42Function as chaperonUhlmann-Schiffler et al. (2006)
DDX43ND
DDX46Pre-mRNA splicingHozumi et al. (2012)
DDX47Pre-RNA processingSekiguchi et al. (2006)
DDX49ND
DDX51Ribosome synthesis and formation of 3′end of 28S rRNASrivastava et al. (2010)
DDX52ND
DDX53ND
DDX54Maintenance of central nervous systemZhan et al. (2013)
DDX55ND
DDX56Assembly of pre-ribosomal particlesZirwes et al. (2000)
DDX59Pathogenesis of orofaciodigital syndromeShamseldin et al. (2013)
EIF4AeIF4F complex formation and facilitates translationHarms et al. (2014)
Nucleolar RNA Hel2 (DDX21)RNA processing during interphase of mitosisDe Wever et al. (2012)
Table 4

Putative functions of DHX members

ProteinFunctionRef.
DHX8Mitosis and involved in mRNA splicingEnglish et al. (2012)
DHX9RNA induced silencing complex (RISC) loading factorFu and Yuan (2013)
DHX15RNA virus sensing and activating immune systemLu et al. (2014)
DHX16SplicingGencheva et al. (2010)
DHX29Protein synthesisPisareva et al. (2008)
DHX30Mitochondrial DNA replicationZhou et al. (2008)
DHX32Lymphocyte differentiation and T cell apoptosisHuang et al. (2009)
DHX33rRNA transcript and nucleolar organizerZhang et al. (2011b)
DHX34NMD (nonsense-mediated mRNA decay)Anastasaki et al. (2011)
DHX35ND
DHX36Viral nucleic acid sensors, affinity towards G4-quadruplexFullam and Schroder (2013)
DHX37Glycinergic synaptic transmission and associated motor behaviourHirata et al. (2013)
DHX38Associated with retinitis pigmentosaAjmal et al. (2014)
DHX40Pre mRNA splicing and ribosome biogenesisXu et al. (2002)
DHX57ND
DHX58Innate antiviral immune responseLi et al. (2009)
Putative functions of DDX members Putative functions of DHX members

Conclusions

Bos taurus genome encodes 54 DExH/D family members (38 DDX and 16 DHX). Present work describes their evolutionary relationship, putative functions, pI, molecular weight and localization. Despite high similarity with well characterized counterparts, for some members, functions could not be predicted which needs further analysis. Hence, this study emphasises towards some bovine DExH/D members requiring further biological characterisation. Similarly, bovine DDX49 and DHX32 need biochemical characterization as they showed unique properties. Association analysis of these members with different abiotic and biotic stress may facilitate new diagnostic markers and drug targets.
  63 in total

1.  Discovery of the first small molecule inhibitor of human DDX3 specifically designed to target the RNA binding site: towards the next generation HIV-1 inhibitors.

Authors:  Marco Radi; Federico Falchi; Anna Garbelli; Alberta Samuele; Vincenzo Bernardo; Stefania Paolucci; Fausto Baldanti; Silvia Schenone; Fabrizio Manetti; Giovanni Maga; Maurizio Botta
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  A miRNA machinery component DDX20 controls NF-κB via microRNA-140 function.

Authors:  Akemi Takata; Motoyuki Otsuka; Takeshi Yoshikawa; Takahiro Kishikawa; Yotaro Kudo; Tadashi Goto; Haruhiko Yoshida; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  The DEAD-box protein family of RNA helicases.

Authors:  Olivier Cordin; Josette Banroques; N Kyle Tanner; Patrick Linder
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 4.  Mechanisms of helicases.

Authors:  Smita S Patel; Ilker Donmez
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  A novel helicase-type protein in the nucleolus: protein NOH61.

Authors:  R F Zirwes; J Eilbracht; S Kneissel; M S Schmidt-Zachmann
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Coordinate regulation of transcription and splicing by steroid receptor coregulators.

Authors:  Didier Auboeuf; Arnd Hönig; Susan M Berget; Bert W O'Malley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Incomplete splicing, cell division defects, and hematopoietic blockage in dhx8 mutant zebrafish.

Authors:  Milton A English; Lin Lei; Trevor Blake; Stephen M Wincovitch; Raman Sood; Mizuki Azuma; Dennis Hickstein; P Paul Liu
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 8.  Mammalian phylogenomics comes of age.

Authors:  William J Murphy; Pavel A Pevzner; Stephen J O'Brien
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Identification of a novel human DDX40gene, a new member of the DEAH-box protein family.

Authors:  Jian Xu; Hai Wu; Chengzhi Zhang; Yueqiong Cao; Liu Wang; Li Zeng; Xin Ye; Qihan Wu; Jianfeng Dai; Yi Xie; Yumin Mao
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 10.  RNA binding protein-mediated post-transcriptional gene regulation in medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Rebecca Bish; Christine Vogel
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.034

View more
  2 in total

1.  RNA helicase DHX15 acts as a tumour suppressor in glioma.

Authors:  Shingo Ito; Hideto Koso; Kazuhiro Sakamoto; Sumiko Watanabe
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  The loss of DHX15 impairs endothelial energy metabolism, lymphatic drainage and tumor metastasis in mice.

Authors:  Jordi Ribera; Irene Portolés; Bernat Córdoba-Jover; Juan Rodríguez-Vita; Gregori Casals; Bernardino González-de la Presa; Mariona Graupera; Estel Solsona-Vilarrasa; Carmen Garcia-Ruiz; José C Fernández-Checa; Guadalupe Soria; Raúl Tudela; Anna Esteve-Codina; Guadalupe Espadas; Eduard Sabidó; Wladimiro Jiménez; William C Sessa; Manuel Morales-Ruiz
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-10-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.