Literature DB >> 2678350

A review of methods for misclassified categorical data in epidemiology.

T T Chen1.   

Abstract

Misclassification introduces errors in categorical variables. This paper presents a review of methods for misclassified categorical data in epidemiology. Different sampling schemes for a 2 x 2 x 2 table and methods of analyses will be discussed first. A misclassification matrix is defined, and the usual misclassification models will be shown to be a subclass of log-linear models. Well-known results on a 2 x 2 table with misclassification and recent results on a 2 x 2 x 2 table are then reviewed. Finally two methods of adjusting for misclassification will be given. The first method assumes a known misclassification matrix, and the second method uses subsampling to estimate the misclassification matrix. The analysis is based on a recursive system of log-linear models: first determine a misclassification model, then select a model for the correctly classified variables. The methods are illustrated by data from traffic safety research on the effectiveness of seatbelt use in reducing injuries.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2678350     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780080908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

1.  External validation, repeat determination, and precision of risk estimation in misclassified exposure data in epidemiology.

Authors:  S W Duffy; D M Maximovitch; N E Day
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Corrected score estimation in the proportional hazards model with misclassified discrete covariates.

Authors:  David M Zucker; Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Correcting for bias in relative risk estimates due to exposure measurement error: a case study of occupational exposure to antineoplastics in pharmacists.

Authors:  D Spiegelman; B Valanis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  On the nondifferential misclassification of a binary confounder.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Ogburn; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 5.  Approaches to uncertainty in exposure assessment in environmental epidemiology.

Authors:  Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 21.981

6.  Maternal and paternal risk factors for cryptorchidism and hypospadias: a case-control study in newborn boys.

Authors:  Frank H Pierik; Alex Burdorf; James A Deddens; Rikard E Juttmann; Rob F A Weber
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.