Literature DB >> 26783112

Competing Factor Models of Child and Adolescent Psychopathology.

Mark M Doyle1, Jamie Murphy2, Mark Shevlin3.   

Abstract

Co-occurring psychological disorders are highly prevalent among children and adolescents. To date, the most widely utilised factor model used to explain this co-occurrence is the two factor model of internalising and externalising (Achenbach 1966). Several competing models of general psychopathology have since been reported as alternatives, including a recent three factor model of Distress, Fear and Externalising Dimensions (Krueger 1999). Evidence for the three factor model suggests there are advantages to utilising a more complex model. Using the British Child and Adolescent Mental Health Survey 2004 data (B-CAMHS; N = 7997), confirmatory factor analysis was used to test competing factor structure models of child and adolescent psychopathology. The B-CAMHS was an epidemiological survey of children between the ages of 5 and 16 in Great Britain. Child psychological disorders were assessed using the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (Goodman 1997), and the Development and Wellbeing Assessment (Goodman et al. 2000). A range of covariates and risk variables including trauma, parent mental health and family functioning where subsequently utilised within a MIMIC model framework to predict each dimension of the 2 and three factor structure models. Two models demonstrated acceptable fit. The first complimented Achenbach's Internalising and Externalising structure. The three factor model was found to have highly comparable fit indices to the two factor model. The second order models did not accurately represent the data nor did an alternative three factor model of Internalising, Externalising and ADHD. The two factor and three factor MIMIC models observed unique profiles of risk for each dimension. The findings suggest that child and adolescent psychopathology may also be accurately conceptualised in terms of distress, fear and externalising dimensions. The MIMIC models demonstrated that the Distress and Fear dimensions have their own unique etiological profile of risk. This study directly informs future measurement models of child and adolescent psychopathology and demonstrates the effectiveness of a three factor model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child psychological disorders; Confirmatory factor analysis; Factor structure; MIMIC models

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26783112     DOI: 10.1007/s10802-016-0129-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol        ISSN: 0091-0627


  55 in total

1.  Merging categorical and dimensional diagnoses of mental disorders.

Authors:  D Regier
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.892

2.  The structure of common mental disorders.

Authors:  R F Krueger
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1999-10

3.  Patterns of psychopathology and dysfunction in high-risk children of parents with panic disorder and major depression.

Authors:  J Biederman; S V Faraone; D R Hirshfeld-Becker; D Friedman; J A Robin; J F Rosenbaum
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Parental psychopathology, parenting styles, and the risk of social phobia in offspring: a prospective-longitudinal community study.

Authors:  R Lieb; H U Wittchen; M Höfler; M Fuetsch; M B Stein; K R Merikangas
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2000-09

5.  The structure and stability of common mental disorders: the NEMESIS study.

Authors:  W A Vollebergh; J Iedema; R V Bijl; R de Graaf; F Smit; J Ormel
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2001-06

6.  The developmental association between eating disorders symptoms and symptoms of depression and anxiety in juvenile twin girls.

Authors:  Judy L Silberg; Cynthia M Bulik
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.982

7.  The structure of psychopathology: toward an expanded quantitative empirical model.

Authors:  Aidan G C Wright; Robert F Krueger; Megan J Hobbs; Kristian E Markon; Nicholas R Eaton; Tim Slade
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2012-10-15

8.  Thought disorder in the meta-structure of psychopathology.

Authors:  K M Keyes; N R Eaton; R F Krueger; A E Skodol; M M Wall; B Grant; L J Siever; D S Hasin
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  Depressive symptoms in low-income mothers and emotional and social functioning in their preschool children.

Authors:  Hillary L Burdette; Robert C Whitaker; Jean Harvey-Berino; Robert S Kahn
Journal:  Ambul Pediatr       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

10.  Maternal depression and psychiatric outcomes in adolescent offspring: a 13-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Sarah L Halligan; Lynne Murray; Carla Martins; Peter J Cooper
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.839

View more
  5 in total

1.  Beyond comorbidity: Toward a dimensional and hierarchical approach to understanding psychopathology across the life span.

Authors:  Miriam K Forbes; Jennifer L Tackett; Kristian E Markon; Robert F Krueger
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2016-11

2.  GW-SEM: A Statistical Package to Conduct Genome-Wide Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Brad Verhulst; Hermine H Maes; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Chronic Stress Exposure and Generation Are Related to the P-Factor and Externalizing Specific Psychopathology in Youth.

Authors:  Hannah R Snyder; Jami F Young; Benjamin L Hankin
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2017-05-25

4.  Toward a multimodal measurement model for the neurobehavioral trait of affiliative capacity.

Authors:  Isabella M Palumbo; Emily R Perkins; James R Yancey; Sarah J Brislin; Christopher J Patrick; Robert D Latzman
Journal:  Personal Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-10

5.  Exploring the utility of RDoC in differentiating effectiveness amongst antidepressants: A systematic review using proposed psychometrics as the unit of analysis for the Negative Valence Systems domain.

Authors:  Andrew Hui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.