Literature DB >> 26782093

Meropenem dosing requirements against Enterobacteriaceae in critically ill patients: influence of renal function, geographical area and presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases.

A Isla1,2, A Canut3,4, J Arribas5, E Asín-Prieto1,2, A Rodríguez-Gascón6,7.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was the evaluation of the influence of the susceptibility patterns of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, specifically the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases and the geographical area (Europe and USA), on the meropenem dosing requirements in critically ill patients with different degrees of renal function by estimation of the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment. Additionally, estimation of the PK/PD breakpoints according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) approach was also an objective. Six dosing regimens were evaluated: 0.5 g, 1 g and 2 g every 8 h given as 0.5-h or 3-h infusions. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from the literature, and susceptibility data to meropenem for E. coli and K. pneumoniae were collected from the Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (T.E.S.T.) surveillance study. For the same dose level, the 3-h infusion provided a probability of target attainment (PTA) ≥90 % for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values up to two-fold dilution higher than those obtained with the 0.5-h infusion. For E. coli, the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was 100 % in most cases, and neither the dose nor the infusion length nor the geographical area significantly affected the probability to reach the target. With regards to K. pneumoniae, the CFR increased when increasing the dose and decreasing the creatinine clearance (CLCR). The CFR for Spanish and USA strains was higher than that calculated for European strains. Meropenem PK/PD breakpoints are dependent on the dose, infusion length and CLCR, ranging from 2 to 32 mg/L. Based on our results, meropenem administered as a extended infusion is the best option to treat infections due to E. coli and K. pneumoniae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26782093     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-015-2568-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  28 in total

Review 1.  Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: (when) might we still consider treating with carbapenems?

Authors:  G L Daikos; A Markogiannakis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 2.  Predicting efficacy of antiinfectives with pharmacodynamics and Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  John S Bradley; Michael N Dudley; George L Drusano
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation of daptomycin, tigecycline, and linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA infections in four western European countries.

Authors:  A Canut; A Isla; C Betriu; A R Gascón
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Standardization of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) terminology for anti-infective drugs: an update.

Authors:  Johan W Mouton; Michael N Dudley; Otto Cars; Hartmut Derendorf; George L Drusano
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meropenem in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Ruth Kitzes-Cohen; Dina Farin; Guillermo Piva; Sylvie Anne De Myttenaere-Bursztein
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.283

6.  Augmented renal clearance, low β-lactam concentrations and clinical outcomes in the critically ill: an observational prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Angela Huttner; Elodie Von Dach; Adriana Renzoni; Benedikt D Huttner; Mathieu Affaticati; Leonardo Pagani; Yousef Daali; Jerôme Pugin; Abderrahim Karmime; Marc Fathi; Daniel Lew; Stephan Harbarth
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 7.  Carbapenemases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and other Enterobacteriaceae: an evolving crisis of global dimensions.

Authors:  L S Tzouvelekis; A Markogiannakis; M Psichogiou; P T Tassios; G L Daikos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 8.  Combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Alexandre P Zavascki; Jurgen B Bulitta; Cornelia B Landersdorfer
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 9.  Combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Yehuda Carmeli; Emanuele Durante-Mangoni; Johan W Mouton; Evelina Tacconelli; Ursula Theuretzbacher; Cristina Mussini; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Decreased meropenem levels in Intensive Care Unit patients with augmented renal clearance: benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  Uwe Tröger; Andreas Drust; Jens Martens-Lobenhoffer; Ivan Tanev; Rüdiger C Braun-Dullaeus; Stefanie M Bode-Böger
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.283

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamic Attainment of the Synergism of Meropenem and Fosfomycin Combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Producing Metallo-β-Lactamase.

Authors:  James Albiero; Josmar Mazucheli; Juliana Pimenta Dos Reis Barros; Marcia Maria Dos Anjos Szczerepa; Sheila Alexandra Belini Nishiyama; Floristher Elaine Carrara-Marroni; Serubbabel Sy; Matthew Fidler; Sherwin K B Sy; Maria Cristina Bronharo Tognim
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Piperacillin-tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of bloodstream infections caused by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a study protocol for a non-inferiority open-label randomised controlled trial (PeterPen).

Authors:  Roni Bitterman; Fidi Koppel; Cristina Mussini; Yuval Geffen; Michal Chowers; Galia Rahav; Lior Nesher; Ronen Ben-Ami; Adi Turjeman; Maayan Huberman Samuel; Matthew P Cheng; Todd C Lee; Leonard Leibovici; Dafna Yahav; Mical Paul
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  The Evaluation of Meropenem Dosing Regimens Against ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli in ICU Patients Using Monte Carlo Simulation.

Authors:  Ei Ei Win; Khaing Win Htun; Pramote Tragulpiankit; Suwida Tangtrakultham; Preecha Montakantikul
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Role of renal function in risk assessment of target non-attainment after standard dosing of meropenem in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Lisa Ehmann; Michael Zoller; Iris K Minichmayr; Christina Scharf; Barbara Maier; Maximilian V Schmitt; Niklas Hartung; Wilhelm Huisinga; Michael Vogeser; Lorenz Frey; Johannes Zander; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-10-21       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Dosing Requirements Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia.

Authors:  Jesus Ruiz; Alejandra Ferrada; Miguel Salavert; Mónica Gordon; Esther Villarreal; Álvaro Castellanos-Ortega; Paula Ramirez
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Dried Plasma Spot Based LC-MS/MS Method for Monitoring of Meropenem in the Blood of Treated Patients.

Authors:  Haiwei Cao; Yi Jiang; Shaomin Wang; Haihuan Cao; Yanyan Li; Jing Huang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.