Literature DB >> 26782029

The response of migratory populations to phenological change: a Migratory Flow Network modelling approach.

Caz M Taylor1, Andrew J Laughlin2, Richard J Hall3.   

Abstract

Declines in migratory species have been linked to anthropogenic climate change through phenological mismatch, which arises due to asynchronies between the timing of life-history events (such as migration) and the phenology of available resources. Long-distance migratory species may be particularly vulnerable to phenological change in their breeding ranges, since the timing of migration departure is based on environmental cues at distant non-breeding sites. Migrants may, however, be able to adjust migration speed en route to the breeding grounds, and thus, ability of migrants to update their timing of migration may depend critically on stopover frequency during migration; however, understanding how migratory strategy influences population dynamics is hindered by a lack of predictive models explicitly linking habitat quality to demography and movement patterns throughout the migratory cycle. Here, we present a novel modelling framework, the Migratory Flow Network (MFN), in which the seasonally varying attractiveness of breeding, winter and stopover regions drives the direction and timing of migration based on a simple general flux law. We use the MFN to investigate how populations respond to shifts in breeding site phenology based on their frequency of stopover and ability to detect and adapt to these changes. With perfect knowledge of advancing phenology, 'jump' migrants (low-frequency stopover) require more adaptation for populations to recover than 'hop' and 'skip' (high or medium frequency stopover) migrants. If adaptation depends on proximity, hop and skip migrants' populations can recover but jump migrants cannot adjust and decline severely. These results highlight the importance of understanding migratory strategies and maintaining high-quality stopover habitat to buffer migratory populations from climate-induced mismatch. We discuss how MFNs could be applied to diverse migratory taxa and highlight the potential of MFNs as a tool for exploring how migrants respond to other environmental changes such as habitat loss.
© 2016 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2016 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bird migration; climate change; hop; mismatch hypothesis; network model; skip and jump

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26782029     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  6 in total

1.  Environmental variability, reliability of information and the timing of migration.

Authors:  Silke Bauer; John M McNamara; Zoltan Barta
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A periodic Markov model to formalize animal migration on a network.

Authors:  Andrea Kölzsch; Erik Kleyheeg; Helmut Kruckenberg; Michael Kaatz; Bernd Blasius
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Stopover use of a large estuarine wetland by dunlins during spring and autumn migrations: Linking local refuelling conditions to migratory strategies.

Authors:  Teresa Catry; José Pedro Granadeiro; Jorge Sánchez Gutiérrez; Edna Correia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Habitat loss exacerbates pathogen spread: An Agent-based model of avian influenza infection in migratory waterfowl.

Authors:  Shenglai Yin; Yanjie Xu; Mingshuai Xu; Mart C M de Jong; Mees R S Huisman; Andrea Contina; Herbert H T Prins; Zheng Y X Huang; Willem F de Boer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.779

5.  Agriculture is adapting to phenological shifts caused by climate change, but grassland songbirds are not.

Authors:  Maeve M McGowan; Noah G Perlut; Allan M Strong
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Transcriptomic Diversity in the Livers of South African Sardines Participating in the Annual Sardine Run.

Authors:  Arsalan Emami-Khoyi; Rynhardt Le Roux; Matthew G Adair; Daniela M Monsanto; Devon C Main; Shilpa P Parbhu; Claudia M Schnelle; Carl D van der Lingen; Bettine Jansen van Vuuren; Peter R Teske
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.096

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.