T A Rumyantseva1, G Bellen2, Y A Savochkina1, A E Guschin1, G G G Donders3,4. 1. Central Research Institute for Epidemiology, Moscow, Russia. 2. Femicare Clinical Research for Women, Femicare vzw, Gasthuismolenstraat 31, 3300, Tienen, Belgium. 3. Femicare Clinical Research for Women, Femicare vzw, Gasthuismolenstraat 31, 3300, Tienen, Belgium. gilbert.donders@femicare.net. 4. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Antwerp, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium. gilbert.donders@femicare.net.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate a real-time PCR-based technique to quantify bacteria associated with aerobic vaginitis (AV) as a potential test. METHODS: Vaginal samples from 100 women were tested by wet-mount microscopy, gram stain and quantitative real-time PCR targeting Enterobacteriacea, Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae, S. aureus; Lactobacillus spp. AV diagnosis obtained by wet-mount microscopy was used as reference. RESULTS: Some level of AV was diagnosed in 23 (23.7 %) cases. Various concentrations of Enterobacteriacea, Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp. were detected an all patients. Enterococcus spp. were detected in 76 (78.3 %) cases. Summarized concentrations of aerobes were tenfold higher in AV-positive compared to AV-negative cases [7.30lg vs 6.06lg (p = 0.02)]. Concentrations of aerobes in severe, moderate and light AV cases did not vary significantly (p = 0.14). Concentration of lactobacilli was 1000-fold lower in AV-positive cases compared to normal cases (5.3lg vs 8.3lg, p < 0.0001). Streptococcus spp. dominated in the majority of AV-positive cases [19/22 (86.4 %) samples]. The relation of high loads of aerobes to the low numbers of Lactobacilli are a reliable marker for the presence of AV and could substitute microscopy as a test. CONCLUSIONS: PCR may be a good standardized substitution for AV diagnosis in settings where well-trained microscopists are lacking.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a real-time PCR-based technique to quantify bacteria associated with aerobic vaginitis (AV) as a potential test. METHODS: Vaginal samples from 100 women were tested by wet-mount microscopy, gram stain and quantitative real-time PCR targeting Enterobacteriacea, Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae, S. aureus; Lactobacillus spp. AV diagnosis obtained by wet-mount microscopy was used as reference. RESULTS: Some level of AV was diagnosed in 23 (23.7 %) cases. Various concentrations of Enterobacteriacea, Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp. were detected an all patients. Enterococcus spp. were detected in 76 (78.3 %) cases. Summarized concentrations of aerobes were tenfold higher in AV-positive compared to AV-negative cases [7.30lg vs 6.06lg (p = 0.02)]. Concentrations of aerobes in severe, moderate and light AV cases did not vary significantly (p = 0.14). Concentration of lactobacilli was 1000-fold lower in AV-positive cases compared to normal cases (5.3lg vs 8.3lg, p < 0.0001). Streptococcus spp. dominated in the majority of AV-positive cases [19/22 (86.4 %) samples]. The relation of high loads of aerobes to the low numbers of Lactobacilli are a reliable marker for the presence of AV and could substitute microscopy as a test. CONCLUSIONS: PCR may be a good standardized substitution for AV diagnosis in settings where well-trained microscopists are lacking.
Authors: Naomi C A Juliana; Meghan J M Suiters; Salwan Al-Nasiry; Servaas A Morré; Remco P H Peters; Elena Ambrosino Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2020-12-10