Literature DB >> 26781051

Why study cognition in the wild (and how to test it)?

David J Pritchard1, T Andrew Hurly2, Maria C Tello-Ramos1, Susan D Healy1.   

Abstract

An animal's behavior is affected by its cognitive abilities, which are, in turn, a consequence of the environment in which an animal has evolved and developed. Although behavioral ecologists have been studying animals in their natural environment for several decades, over much the same period animal cognition has been studied almost exclusively in the laboratory. Traditionally, the study of animal cognition has been based on well-established paradigms used to investigate well-defined cognitive processes. This allows identification of what animals can do, but may not, however, always reflect what animals actually do in the wild. As both ecologists and some psychologists increasingly try to explain behaviors observable only in wild animals, we review the different motivations and methodologies used to study cognition in the wild and identify some of the challenges that accompany the combination of a naturalistic approach together with typical psychological testing paradigms. We think that studying animal cognition in the wild is likely to be most productive when the questions addressed correspond to the species' ecology and when laboratory cognitive tests are appropriately adapted for use in the field. Furthermore, recent methodological and technological advances will likely allow significant expansion of the species and questions that can be addressed in the wild.
© 2016 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Keywords:  behavioral ecology; cognitive ecology; comparative cognition; field experiments; spatial cognition; timing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26781051     DOI: 10.1002/jeab.195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  Numerical ordinality in a wild nectarivore.

Authors:  Tas I F Vámos; Maria C Tello-Ramos; T Andrew Hurly; Susan D Healy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Intra-specific differences in cognition: bumblebee queens learn better than workers.

Authors:  Felicity Muth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.812

Review 3.  Treating hummingbirds as feathered bees: a case of ethological cross-pollination.

Authors:  D J Pritchard; M C Tello Ramos; F Muth; S D Healy
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Simultaneous measurements of three-dimensional trajectories and wingbeat frequencies of birds in the field.

Authors:  Hangjian Ling; Guillam E Mclvor; Geoff Nagy; Sepehr MohaimenianPour; Richard T Vaughan; Alex Thornton; Nicholas T Ouellette
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Measuring and understanding individual differences in cognition.

Authors:  Neeltje J Boogert; Joah R Madden; Julie Morand-Ferron; Alex Thornton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Influences of demographic, seasonal, and social factors on automated touchscreen computer use by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in a large naturalistic group.

Authors:  Regina Paxton Gazes; Meredith C Lutz; Mark J Meyer; Thomas C Hassett; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The social life of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Manon K Schweinfurth
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Social learning about dangerous people by wild jackdaws.

Authors:  Victoria E Lee; Noémie Régli; Guillam E McIvor; Alex Thornton
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Cognition in the field: comparison of reversal learning performance in captive and wild passerines.

Authors:  M Cauchoix; E Hermer; A S Chaine; J Morand-Ferron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The quick are the dead: pheasants that are slow to reverse a learned association survive for longer in the wild.

Authors:  Joah R Madden; Ellis J G Langley; Mark A Whiteside; Christine E Beardsworth; Jayden O van Horik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.