Literature DB >> 26779225

Commentary: Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Raphanus sativus Tissues.

Xiaofeng Gu1, Tiegang Lu1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq); Raphanus sativus; simple sequence repeats (SSRs); trancriptome; transcription factors

Year:  2016        PMID: 26779225      PMCID: PMC4700402          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


× No keyword cloud information.
Obtaining sequence information for a plant species of interest greatly facilitates functional genomic research. However, many plant species have not been sequenced due to the complexities of their genomes and the high cost of sequencing. Therefore, the transcriptomes of several plants were sequenced using next-generation sequencing technology. RNA-seq technology is an important high-throughput tool for both gene mapping and the transcriptome analysis of non-model organisms lacking genome information (Schuster, 2008; Wang et al., 2009; Klie et al., 2012; Drogue et al., 2014; Druege et al., 2014). Additionally, RNA-seq data can help connect the genome to gene function (Adams, 2008) and have tremendously expanded the volume of transcriptome information available for non-model plants. The uniformly processed and matched nature of the transcriptome data also facilitates their integration with upstream factor-binding and chromatin-modification signals (Gerstein et al., 2014). The transcriptome sequencing analyses of single tissues from Raphanus sativus were recently reported because it is an important Brassicaceae plant with both economic value and medicinal properties (Wang et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013). These studies have advanced functional genomic investigations of R. sativus. However, routine analysis and annotation methods have impeded our understanding of the functional genomics and medicinal potential of R. sativus. The traditional analysis of transcriptome data focuses on evaluating the expression changes of single genes. The accumulating volume of transcriptome data requires the development of new methods and tools for data integration. The network theory and similar methods have been widely used to analyze high-throughput data in the field of systems biology (Ashburner, 2000; Lee et al., 2010; Kleessen et al., 2013). Cytoscape is an open source software used for visualizing molecular interaction networks and biological pathways. The software can also integrate these networks with annotation and gene expression data (Shannon et al., 2003; Ma et al., 2014). Using R. sativus as a model, Wu et al. (2015) combined the leaf sequencing data with the root sequencing data and obtained the better transcriptome assembly of R. sativus. For example, the authors obtained 68,086 unigenes with an average length of 576 bp by Trinity program, which represents a rich genome resource of R. sativus. Moreover, a total of 31,875 potential simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were identified in this article. SSRs are repeating DNA sequences of 2–6 bp and widely used in molecular marker identification, high-throughput genome mapping, and the analysis of species diversity. Thus, the identification of multiple SSRs in R. sativus will be very helpful for the functional genomic research of R. sativus in the future. The authors (Wu et al., 2015) used Cytoscape software to annotate these differentially expressed genes (Figure 1). The annotations effectively explained the GO classifications for the differentially expressed genes found in leaf and root tissues and are very important for functional genomics research of R. sativus. In addition, Wu et al. examined the TFs (transcription factors) in R. sativus and constructed a TF-based regulation network using Cytoscape software to elucidate the regulatory network controlling the development of R. sativus. This analysis may provide critical insights into the regulatory role of TFs in the development of R. sativus.
Figure 1

Biological process analysis of differentially expressed genes between leaf and root tissues. GO modules enriched with up-regulated DEGs (A) and down-regulated DEGs (B) were visualized by the EnrichmentMap in Cytoscape. The red and yellow circles indicate the common and different biological processes between up-regulated and down-regulated DEGs, respectively (From the article Wu et al., 2015).

Biological process analysis of differentially expressed genes between leaf and root tissues. GO modules enriched with up-regulated DEGs (A) and down-regulated DEGs (B) were visualized by the EnrichmentMap in Cytoscape. The red and yellow circles indicate the common and different biological processes between up-regulated and down-regulated DEGs, respectively (From the article Wu et al., 2015). This study is not only an important genomic resource for R. sativus because it provides both transcriptome sequencing and a TF-based interaction network but also will also facilitate future network-based functional genomic analyses and will provide insights into the systematic analysis of high-throughput sequencing data.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  14 in total

1.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks.

Authors:  Paul Shannon; Andrew Markiel; Owen Ozier; Nitin S Baliga; Jonathan T Wang; Daniel Ramage; Nada Amin; Benno Schwikowski; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Rational association of genes with traits using a genome-scale gene network for Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Insuk Lee; Bindu Ambaru; Pranjali Thakkar; Edward M Marcotte; Seung Y Rhee
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-01-31       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  Next-generation sequencing transforms today's biology.

Authors:  Stephan C Schuster
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 4.  Data integration through proximity-based networks provides biological principles of organization across scales.

Authors:  Sabrina Kleessen; Sebastian Klie; Zoran Nikoloski
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Machine learning-based differential network analysis: a study of stress-responsive transcriptomes in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Chuang Ma; Mingming Xin; Kenneth A Feldmann; Xiangfeng Wang
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 6.  RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics.

Authors:  Zhong Wang; Mark Gerstein; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Compromise of multiple time-resolved transcriptomics experiments identifies tightly regulated functions.

Authors:  Sebastian Klie; Camila Caldana; Zoran Nikoloski
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Comparative analysis of the transcriptome across distant species.

Authors:  Mark B Gerstein; Joel Rozowsky; Koon-Kiu Yan; Daifeng Wang; Chao Cheng; James B Brown; Carrie A Davis; LaDeana Hillier; Cristina Sisu; Jingyi Jessica Li; Baikang Pei; Arif O Harmanci; Michael O Duff; Sarah Djebali; Roger P Alexander; Burak H Alver; Raymond Auerbach; Kimberly Bell; Peter J Bickel; Max E Boeck; Nathan P Boley; Benjamin W Booth; Lucy Cherbas; Peter Cherbas; Chao Di; Alex Dobin; Jorg Drenkow; Brent Ewing; Gang Fang; Megan Fastuca; Elise A Feingold; Adam Frankish; Guanjun Gao; Peter J Good; Roderic Guigó; Ann Hammonds; Jen Harrow; Roger A Hoskins; Cédric Howald; Long Hu; Haiyan Huang; Tim J P Hubbard; Chau Huynh; Sonali Jha; Dionna Kasper; Masaomi Kato; Thomas C Kaufman; Robert R Kitchen; Erik Ladewig; Julien Lagarde; Eric Lai; Jing Leng; Zhi Lu; Michael MacCoss; Gemma May; Rebecca McWhirter; Gennifer Merrihew; David M Miller; Ali Mortazavi; Rabi Murad; Brian Oliver; Sara Olson; Peter J Park; Michael J Pazin; Norbert Perrimon; Dmitri Pervouchine; Valerie Reinke; Alexandre Reymond; Garrett Robinson; Anastasia Samsonova; Gary I Saunders; Felix Schlesinger; Anurag Sethi; Frank J Slack; William C Spencer; Marcus H Stoiber; Pnina Strasbourger; Andrea Tanzer; Owen A Thompson; Kenneth H Wan; Guilin Wang; Huaien Wang; Kathie L Watkins; Jiayu Wen; Kejia Wen; Chenghai Xue; Li Yang; Kevin Yip; Chris Zaleski; Yan Zhang; Henry Zheng; Steven E Brenner; Brenton R Graveley; Susan E Celniker; Thomas R Gingeras; Robert Waterston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Plant root transcriptome profiling reveals a strain-dependent response during Azospirillum-rice cooperation.

Authors:  Benoît Drogue; Hervé Sanguin; Amel Chamam; Michael Mozar; Christel Llauro; Olivier Panaud; Claire Prigent-Combaret; Nathalie Picault; Florence Wisniewski-Dyé
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Transcriptome analysis of leaf tissue of Raphanus sativus by RNA sequencing.

Authors:  Libin Zhang; Haibo Jia; Yongtai Yin; Gang Wu; Heng Xia; Xiaodong Wang; Chunhua Fu; Maoteng Li; Jiangsheng Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Transcriptome Analysis of Stem and Globally Comparison with Other Tissues in Brassica napus.

Authors:  Liyun Miao; Libin Zhang; Nadia Raboanatahiry; Guangyuan Lu; Xuekun Zhang; Jun Xiang; Jianping Gan; Chunhua Fu; Maoteng Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 5.753

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.