Literature DB >> 26778345

Glaucoma Structural and Functional Progression in American and Korean Cohorts.

Tigran Kostanyan1, Kyung Rim Sung2, Joel S Schuman3, Yun Ling4, Katie A Lucy1, Richard A Bilonick4, Hiroshi Ishikawa5, Larry Kagemann5, Jin Y Lee2, Gadi Wollstein5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the rate of glaucoma structural and functional progression in American and Korean cohorts.
DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal study. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred thirteen eyes from 189 glaucoma and glaucoma suspects, followed up for an average of 38 months.
METHODS: All subjects were examined semiannually with visual field (VF) testing and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. All subjects had 5 or more reliable visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The rates of change of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, cup-to-disc (C/D) ratios, and VF mean deviation (MD) were compared between the cohorts. Variables affecting the rate of change for each parameter were determined, including ethnicity, refraction, baseline age and disease severity, disease subtype (high- vs. normal-tension glaucoma), clinical diagnosis (glaucoma vs. glaucoma suspect), and the interactions between variables.
RESULTS: The Korean cohort predominantly demonstrated normal-tension glaucoma, whereas the American cohort predominantly demonstrated high-tension glaucoma. Cohorts had similar VF parameters at baseline, but the Korean eyes had significantly thicker mean RNFL and larger cups. Korean glaucoma eyes showed a faster thinning of mean RNFL (mean, -0.71 μm/year vs. -0.24 μm/year; P < 0.01). There were no detectable differences in the rate of change between the glaucoma cohorts for C/D ratios and VF MD and for all parameters in glaucoma suspect eyes. Different combinations of the tested variables significantly impacted the rate of change.
CONCLUSIONS: Ethnicity, baseline disease severity, disease subtype, and clinical diagnosis should be considered when comparing glaucoma progression studies.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26778345      PMCID: PMC5069198          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  22 in total

1.  Risk factors for primary open-angle glaucoma in South Korea: the Namil study.

Authors:  Martha Kim; Tae-Woo Kim; Ki Ho Park; Joon Mo Kim
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Risk factors for visual field progression in the groningen longitudinal glaucoma study: a comparison of different statistical approaches.

Authors:  Christiaan Wesselink; Michael W Marcus; Nomdo M Jansonius
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Effect of race, age, and axial length on optic nerve head parameters and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Cirrus HD-OCT.

Authors:  O'Rese J Knight; Christopher A Girkin; Donald L Budenz; Mary K Durbin; William J Feuer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03

4.  Analysis of normal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by age, sex, and race using spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Tarek Alasil; Kaidi Wang; Pearse A Keane; Hang Lee; Neda Baniasadi; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Racial variability of glaucoma risk factors between African Caribbeans and Caucasians in a Canadian urban screening population.

Authors:  Alvine A Kamdeu Fansi; Demosthenes G Papamatheakis; Paul J Harasymowycz
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.882

6.  Detection of glaucomatous progression by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jung Hwa Na; Kyung Rim Sung; Jong Rak Lee; Kyoung Sub Lee; Seunghee Baek; Hwang Ki Kim; Yong Ho Sohn
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Estimating the rate of progressive visual field damage in those with open-angle glaucoma, from cross-sectional data.

Authors:  Aimee Teo Broman; Harry A Quigley; Sheila K West; Joanne Katz; Beatriz Munoz; Karen Bandeen-Roche; James M Tielsch; David S Friedman; Jonathan Crowston; Hugh R Taylor; Rohit Varma; M Cristina Leske; Boel Bengtsson; Anders Heijl; Mingguang He; Paul J Foster
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Anders Heijl; Boel Bengtsson; Leslie Hyman; M Cristina Leske
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Longitudinal analysis of progression in glaucoma using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Julia M Wessel; Folkert K Horn; Ralf P Tornow; Matthias Schmid; Christian Y Mardin; Friedrich E Kruse; Anselm G Juenemann; Robert Laemmer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Prevalence and characteristics of glaucoma among Korean adults.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Kim; Sung Yong Kang; Na Rae Kim; Eun Suk Lee; Samin Hong; Gong Je Seong; Young Jae Hong; Chan Yun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-11
View more
  9 in total

1.  Reply.

Authors:  Joel S Schuman; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Re: Kostanyan et al.: Glaucoma structural and functional progression in American and Korean cohorts (Ophthalmology 2016;123:783-788).

Authors:  Cong Ye; Yuan Bo Liang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Progression of primary open angle glaucoma in asymmetrically myopic eyes.

Authors:  Min Kyung Song; Kyung Rim Sung; Seungbong Han; Jong Eun Lee; Joo Young Yoon; Ji Min Park; Ji Yun Lee
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Can Macula and Optic Nerve Head Parameters Detect Glaucoma Progression in Eyes with Advanced Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Damage?

Authors:  Fabio Lavinsky; Mengfei Wu; Joel S Schuman; Katie A Lucy; Mengling Liu; Youngseok Song; Julia Fallon; Maria de Los Angeles Ramos Cadena; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Evaluation of Structure-Function Relationships in Longitudinal Changes of Glaucoma using the Spectralis OCT Follow-Up Mode.

Authors:  Kenji Suda; Tadamichi Akagi; Hideo Nakanishi; Hisashi Noma; Hanako Ohashi Ikeda; Takanori Kameda; Tomoko Hasegawa; Akitaka Tsujikawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Artifacts and Anatomic Variations in Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Atilla Bayer; Ahmet Akman
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-29

7.  Association Between Sex Hormones and Visual Field Progression in Women With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Cross-Sectional and Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yichao Qiu; Jian Yu; Li Tang; Jun Ren; Mingxi Shao; Shengjie Li; Yunxiao Song; Wenjun Cao; Xinghuai Sun
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width thinning rate in open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Donghee Park; Sung Pyo Park; Kyeong Ik Na
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 9.  The Future of Imaging in Detecting Glaucoma Progression.

Authors:  Fabio Lavinsky; Gadi Wollstein; Jenna Tauber; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 14.277

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.