Literature DB >> 26778316

Addition of meloxicam to the treatment of clinical mastitis improves subsequent reproductive performance.

S McDougall1, E Abbeloos2, S Piepers3, A S Rao4, S Astiz5, T van Werven6, J Statham7, N Pérez-Villalobos8.   

Abstract

A blinded, negative controlled, randomized intervention study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that addition of meloxicam, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, to antimicrobial treatment of mild to moderate clinical mastitis would improve fertility and reduce the risk of removal from the herd. Cows (n=509) from 61 herds in 8 regions (sites) in 6 European countries were enrolled. Following herd-owner diagnosis of mild to moderate clinical mastitis within the first 120 d of lactation in a single gland, the rectal temperature, milk appearance, and California Mastitis Test score were assessed. Cows were randomly assigned within each site to be treated either with meloxicam or a placebo (control). All cows were additionally treated with 1 to 4 intramammary infusions of cephalexin and kanamycin at 24-h intervals. Prior to treatment and at 14 and 21 d posttreatment, milk samples were collected for bacteriology and somatic cell count. Cows were bred by artificial insemination and pregnancy status was subsequently defined. General estimating equations were used to determine the effect of treatment (meloxicam versus control) on bacteriological cure, somatic cell count, the probability of being inseminated by 21 d after the voluntary waiting period, the probability of conception to first artificial insemination, the number of artificial insemination/conception, the probability of pregnancy by 120 or 200 d postcalving, and the risk of removal by 300 d after treatment. Cox's proportional hazards models were used to test the effect of treatment on the calving to first insemination and calving to conception intervals. Groups did not differ in terms of age, clot score, California Mastitis Test score, rectal temperature, number of antimicrobial treatments given or bacteria present at the time of enrollment, but cows treated with meloxicam had greater days in milk at enrollment. Cows treated with meloxicam had a higher bacteriological cure proportion than those treated with the placebo [0.66 (standard error=0.04) versus 0.50 (standard error=0.06), respectively], although the proportion of glands from which no bacteria were isolated posttreatment did not differ between groups. No difference was observed in the somatic cell count between groups pre- or posttreatment. The proportion of cows that underwent artificial insemination by 21 d after the voluntary waiting period was unaffected by treatment. Treatment with meloxicam was associated with a higher proportion of cows conceiving to their first artificial insemination (0.31 versus 0.21), and a higher proportion of meloxicam-treated cows were pregnant by 120 d after calving (0.40 versus 0.31). The number of artificial inseminations required to achieve conception was lower in the meloxicam compared with control cows (2.43 versus 2.92). No difference was observed between groups in the proportion of cows pregnant by 200 d after calving or in the proportion of cows that were culled, died, or sold by 300 d after calving (17% versus 21% for meloxicam versus control, respectively). It was concluded that use of meloxicam, in conjunction with antimicrobial therapy, for mild to moderate cases of clinical mastitis, resulted in a higher probability of bacteriological cure, an increased probability of conception to first artificial insemination, fewer artificial inseminations, and a greater proportion of cows pregnant by 120 d in milk.
Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cure; fertility; mastitis; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26778316     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-9615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

1.  Use of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Attitudes to Pain in Pasture-Based Dairy Cows: A Comparative Study of Farmers and Veterinarians.

Authors:  Natasha Browne; Muireann Conneely; Chris Hudson
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-30

2.  Inflammation: friend or foe of bovine reproduction?

Authors:  Sylvie Chastant; Marie Saint-Dizier
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 1.807

3.  Digital gene expression analyses of mammary glands from meat ewes naturally infected with clinical mastitis.

Authors:  Taotao Li; Jianfeng Gao; Xingxu Zhao; Youji Ma
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 4.  Advances in therapeutic and managemental approaches of bovine mastitis: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Khan Sharun; Kuldeep Dhama; Ruchi Tiwari; Mudasir Bashir Gugjoo; Mohd Iqbal Yatoo; Shailesh Kumar Patel; Mamta Pathak; Kumaragurubaran Karthik; Sandip Kumar Khurana; Rahul Singh; Bhavani Puvvala; Rajendra Singh; Karam Pal Singh; Wanpen Chaicumpa
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.320

5.  Influence of a Single Dose of Meloxicam Administrated during Canine Estrus on Progesterone Concentration and Fertility-A Clinical Case Study.

Authors:  Michał Dzięcioł; Aleksandra Szpaczek; Oliwia Uchańska; Wojciech Niżański
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Effect of glycyrrhizin administration followed by symptom-based antimicrobial selection therapy on antimicrobial use in clinical mastitis without systemic symptoms.

Authors:  Tomomi Kurumisawa; Takuya Yagisawa; Yasunori Shinozuka; Kazuhiro Kawai
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 1.105

Review 7.  A Critical Overview on Prostaglandin Inhibitors and Their Influence on Pregnancy Results after Insemination and Embryo Transfer in Cows.

Authors:  Bartłomiej M Jaśkowski; Adam Opałka; Marek Gehrke; Magdalena Herudzińska; Jarosław Czeladko; Walter Baumgartner; Jędrzej M Jaśkowski
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.