Literature DB >> 26778165

Comparison of Early Versus Delayed Oral β Blockers in Acute Coronary Syndromes and Effect on Outcomes.

Raffaele Bugiardini1, Edina Cenko2, Beatrice Ricci2, Zorana Vasiljevic3, Maria Dorobantu4, Sasko Kedev5, Marija Vavlukis5, Oliver Kalpak5, Paolo Emilio Puddu6, Olivija Gustiene7, Dijana Trninic8, Božidarka Knežević9, Davor Miličić10, Christopher P Gale11, Olivia Manfrini2, Akos Koller12, Lina Badimon13.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if earlier administration of oral β ​blocker therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) is associated with an increased short-term survival rate and improved left ventricular (LV) function. We studied 11,581 patients enrolled in the International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Transitional Countries registry from January 2010 to June 2014. Of these patients, 6,117 were excluded as they received intravenous β blockers or remained free of any β ​blocker treatment during hospital stay, 23 as timing of oral β ​blocker administration was unknown, and 182 patients because they died before oral β blockers could be given. The final study population comprised 5,259 patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was the incidence of severe LV dysfunction defined as an ejection fraction <40% at hospital discharge. Oral β blockers were administered soon (≤24 hours) after hospital admission in 1,377 patients and later (>24 hours) during hospital stay in the remaining 3,882 patients. Early β ​blocker therapy was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.80) and reduced incidence of severe LV dysfunction (odds ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.78). Significant mortality benefits with early β ​blocker therapy disappeared when patients with Killip class III/IV were included as dummy variables. The results were confirmed by propensity score-matched analyses. In conclusion, in patients with ACSs, earlier administration of oral β ​blocker therapy should be a priority with a greater probability of improving LV function and in-hospital survival rate. Patients presenting with acute pulmonary edema or cardiogenic shock should be excluded from this early treatment regimen.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26778165     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.11.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  11 in total

1.  Sex Differences in Outcomes After STEMI: Effect Modification by Treatment Strategy and Age.

Authors:  Edina Cenko; Jinsung Yoon; Sasko Kedev; Goran Stankovic; Zorana Vasiljevic; Gordana Krljanac; Oliver Kalpak; Beatrice Ricci; Davor Milicic; Olivia Manfrini; Mihaela van der Schaar; Lina Badimon; Raffaele Bugiardini
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Risk to Young Women.

Authors:  Beatrice Ricci; Edina Cenko; Zorana Vasiljevic; Goran Stankovic; Sasko Kedev; Oliver Kalpak; Marija Vavlukis; Marija Zdravkovic; Sasa Hinic; Davor Milicic; Olivia Manfrini; Lina Badimon; Raffaele Bugiardini
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 3.  The Application of Traditional Chinese Medicine Injection on Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome during the Perioperative Period of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Zhaofeng Shi; Chen Zhao; Jiayuan Hu; Qianqian Dai; Manke Guan; Changming Zhong; Guihua Tian; Hongcai Shang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Beta-blockers and Short-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes In Patients Hospitalized For Acute Coronary Syndrome and a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ≥40.

Authors:  Charbel Abi Khalil; Mohammad Zubaid; Menatalla Mekhaimar; Nidal Asaad; Ziyad Mahfoud; Jassim Al Suwaidi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The Hypertension Paradox: Survival Benefit After ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With History of Hypertension. A Prospective Cohort- and Risk-Analysis.

Authors:  Fabian Hoffmann; Patricia Fassbender; Wilhelm Zander; Lisa Ulbrich; Kathrin Kuhr; Christoph Adler; Marcel Halbach; Hannes Reuter
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-24

6.  Effects of National Hospital Accreditation in Acute Coronary Syndrome on In-Hospital Mortality and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Ta Ko; Chia-Hung Yang; Chun-Tai Mao; Li-Tang Kuo; Ming-Jer Hsieh; Dong-Yi Chen; Chao-Yung Wang; Yu-Sheng Lin; I-Chang Hsieh; Shao-Wei Chen; Ming-Jui Hung; Wen-Jin Cherng; Tien-Hsing Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.672

7.  Usefulness of coronary flow reserve measured by transthoracic coronary Doppler ultrasound in the elderly.

Authors:  Danijela Trifunovic; Edina Cenko; Concetta Torromeo; Beatrice Ricci; Michele Schiariti; Marija Zdravkovic; Zorana Vasiljevic; Olivia Manfrini
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Coronary heart disease incidence and competing risks: an important issue.

Authors:  Paolo Emilio Puddu; Peter Louis Amaduzzi; Beatrice Ricci
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Delayed Care and Mortality Among Women and Men With Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Raffaele Bugiardini; Beatrice Ricci; Edina Cenko; Zorana Vasiljevic; Sasko Kedev; Goran Davidovic; Marija Zdravkovic; Davor Miličić; Mirza Dilic; Olivia Manfrini; Akos Koller; Lina Badimon
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  Update on pharmacological treatment of acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in the elderly.

Authors:  Coşkun Usta; Aslı Bedel
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.