Literature DB >> 26778050

Accuracy and safety of targeting using intraoperative "O-arm" during placement of deep brain stimulation electrodes without electrophysiological recordings.

Mayur Sharma1, Milind Deogaonkar2.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to investigate the accuracy of targeting using intraoperative "O-arm" during deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Intraoperative O-arm (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) images were obtained to confirm the accuracy of placement. The difference between intended and actual target coordinates was calculated based on intraoperative images and postoperative CT scan. Euclidian vector error was obtained to estimate the directional error. Correlation of targeting error with the pneumocephalus and the deviation from the planned trajectory was also estimated. Twenty eight DBS leads (globus pallidus internus [GPi], n=13; subthalamic nucleus [STN], n=9; ventralis intermedius nucleus [VIM], n=6) were implanted in 20 patients using the stereotactic Leksell frame (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) under general anesthesia over a period of 1year. The mean age was 63.6±standard error of the mean (SEM) 15.7years and 60% of patients were males. The mean absolute difference (+SEM) between intended and actual target in x, y and z coordinates based on intraoperative CT scan was 0.65±0.09 (p=0.84), 0.58±0.08 (p=0.98), 1.13±0.10 (p=0.08), respectively, and postoperative (1month) CT scan was 0.82±0.15 (p=0.89), 0.55±0.11 (p=0.97), and 1.58±0.29 (p=0.08), respectively. The Euclidean vector error was 1.59±0.10 and 2.16±0.26 based on intraoperative and postoperative images, respectively. There was no statistically significant targeting error based on fusion of intraoperative CT images to either preoperative CT scan or MRI as registration series, the presence of pneumocephalus, deviation from planned trajectory or the anatomical target (STN versus VIM versus GPi) (p>0.05). Superficial skin infection was encountered in a single patient in this study. The mean total operating room time was 193.5±74.6 minutes. None of the patients required revision in our study. DBS leads can be implanted safely and accurately using intraoperative O-arm with a frame based targeting system and can be used in selected patients.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Deep brain stimulation; Image guidance; Intraoperative; Neuromodulation; Safety

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26778050     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.06.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  11 in total

1.  Accuracy of Intraoperative Computed Tomography during Deep Brain Stimulation Procedures: Comparison with Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Maarten Bot; Pepijn van den Munckhof; Roy Bakay; Glenn Stebbins; Leo Verhagen Metman
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Implementation of Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (O-arm) for Stereotactic Imaging During Deep Brain Stimulation Procedures.

Authors:  Rozemarije A Holewijn; Maarten Bot; Pepijn van den Munckhof; P Richard Schuurman
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.703

3.  Comparison of Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Fluoroscopy With Standard Computed Tomography for Stereotactic Frame Registration.

Authors:  Terrance Peng; Daniel R Kramer; Morgan B Lee; Michael F Barbaro; Li Ding; Charles Y Liu; Spencer Kellis; Brian Lee
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.703

Review 4.  Targeting of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Patients with Parkinson's Disease Undergoing Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery.

Authors:  Pepijn van den Munckhof; Maarten Bot; P Richard Schuurman
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2021-02-09

5.  The pros and cons of intraoperative CT scan in evaluation of deep brain stimulation lead implantation: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Domenico Servello; Edvin Zekaj; Christian Saleh; Claudio Pacchetti; Mauro Porta
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-08-02

6.  Metal artifacts in intraoperative O-arm CBCT scans.

Authors:  Juha I Peltonen; Touko Kaasalainen; Mika Kortesniemi
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Feasability of a Frameless Brain Biopsy System for Companion Animals Using Cone-Beam CT-Based Automated Registration.

Authors:  Felix Meneses; Arianna Maiolini; Franck Forterre; Anna Oevermann; Daniela Schweizer-Gorgas
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-02-09

8.  Comparative evaluation of tractography-based direct targeting and atlas-based indirect targeting of the ventral intermediate (Vim) nucleus in MRgFUS thalamotomy.

Authors:  Federico Bruno; Alessia Catalucci; Marco Varrassi; Francesco Arrigoni; Patrizia Sucapane; Davide Cerone; Francesca Pistoia; Silvia Torlone; Emanuele Tommasino; Luca De Santis; Antonio Barile; Alessandro Ricci; Carmine Marini; Alessandra Splendiani; Carlo Masciocchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Frameless Stereotaxis for Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation: An Innovative Method for the Direct Visualization of Electrode Implantation by Intraoperative X-ray Control.

Authors:  Paolo Mazzone; Alessandro Stefani; Fabio Viselli; Eugenio Scarnati
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-05-15

10.  Stereotactic accuracy and frame mounting: A phantom study.

Authors:  Onur Alptekin; Felix S Gubler; Linda Ackermans; Pieter L Kubben; Mark L Kuijf; Ersoy Kocabicak; Yasin Temel
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.