Literature DB >> 26777687

Ultrasound screening: Status of markers and efficacy of screening for structural abnormalities.

Rashmi Rao1, Lawrence D Platt2.   

Abstract

Aneuploidy is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality and can have a significant impact on expecting parents and their families. With early screening and diagnosis it is important to be able to educate parents regarding the potential impact of the diagnosis. This knowledge allows parents the opportunity to consider management options early in the pregnancy, permitting more time to mentally and emotionally prepare both for the course of the pregnancy, and after the birth of the child should the pregnancy continue. Prenatal screening provides pregnant women a non-invasive risk assessment for the most common aneuploidies. Those who are considered "high-risk" then have the option for additional diagnostic (invasive) testing. Prior to the 1980s, prenatal screening consisted of risk assessment through maternal age; however, with the advent of maternal serum biochemical analysis and ultrasound, the field of prenatal screening developed significantly. As biochemical and sonographic advances continued into the 1990s, the emphasis shifted to risk assessment in the first trimester, with the combination of maternal serum analytes and sonographic evaluation of the nuchal translucency.(1) Within the last decade, the introduction of non-invasive screening (NIPT/S) has shown great impact on the expansion and evolving practice of prenatal screening. Although in many places the standard for prenatal testing continues to include maternal serum analytes and sonographic evaluation, the role of each marker alone and in combination remains important. In the era of increasingly available screening tests, especially with NIPT/(NIPS), this article attempts to review the current role of ultrasound in prenatal care and elucidate the role of ultrasound markers in prenatal screening.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26777687     DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  8 in total

1.  INITIAL EXPERIENCE WITH 3D-ULTRASOUND AS AN ADJUNCT TO 2DULTRASOUND IN FETAL ANOMALY DIAGNOSIS IN A NIGERIAN DIAGNOSTIC FACILITY.

Authors:  J A Akinmoladun; V O Oboro; T I Adelakun
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2020-12

2.  Noninvasive prenatal testing in routine clinical practice for a high-risk population: Experience from a center.

Authors:  Guijie Qi; Jianping Yi; Baosheng Han; Heng Liu; Wanru Guo; Chong Shi; Lirong Yin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in Canada.

Authors:  Peri Abdullah; Christine Kurtz Landy; Hugh McCague; Alison Macpherson; Hala Tamim
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for the Prenatal Diagnosis in Fetuses with Nasal Bone Hypoplasia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hailong Huang; Meiying Cai; Wei Ma; Na Lin; Liangpu Xu
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-04-14

5.  Utility of fetal facial markers on a second trimester genetic sonogram in screening for Down syndrome in a high-risk Thai population.

Authors:  Savitree Pranpanus; Kanokkarn Keatkongkaew; Manaphat Suksai
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Reference values of nuchal fold thickness in an Iranian population sample.

Authors:  Kimia Kazemi; Atoosa Adibi; Silva Hovsepian
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Impact of ultrasonography on identifying noninvasive prenatal screening false-negative aneuploidy.

Authors:  Wei Li; Fanwei Zeng; Baitong Fan; Nan Yu; Jing Wu; Yun Yang; Hui Huang; Sheng-Li Li; Zhiyu Peng
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 2.183

Review 8.  Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gioia Mastromoro; Daniele Guadagnolo; Nader Khaleghi Hashemian; Enrica Marchionni; Alice Traversa; Antonio Pizzuti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.