Joshua J White1, Tao Lin1, Amanda M Brown1, Marife Arancillo1, Elizabeth P Lackey1, Trace L Stay1, Roy V Sillitoe2. 1. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute of Texas Children's Hospital, 1250 Moursund Street, Suite 1325, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 2. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute of Texas Children's Hospital, 1250 Moursund Street, Suite 1325, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: sillitoe@bcm.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Electrophysiological recording approaches are essential for understanding brain function. Among these approaches are various methods of performing single-unit recordings. However, a major hurdle to overcome when recording single units in vivo is stability. Poor stability results in a low signal-to-noise ratio, which makes it challenging to isolate neuronal signals. Proper isolation is needed for differentiating a signal from neighboring cells or the noise inherent to electrophysiology. Insufficient isolation makes it impossible to analyze full action potential waveforms. A common source of instability is an inadequate surgery. Problems during surgery cause blood loss, tissue damage and poor healing of the surrounding tissue, limited access to the target brain region, and, importantly, unreliable fixation points for holding the mouse's head. NEW METHOD: We describe an optimized surgical procedure that ensures limited tissue damage and delineate a method for implanting head plates to hold the animal firmly in place. RESULTS: Using the cerebellum as a model, we implement an extracellular recording technique to acquire single units from Purkinje cells and cerebellar nuclear neurons in behaving mice. We validate the stability of our method by holding single units after injecting the powerful tremorgenic drug harmaline. We performed multiple structural analyses after recording. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Our approach is ideal for studying neuronal function in active mice and valuable for recording single-neuron activity when considerable motion is unavoidable. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical principles we present for accessing the cerebellum can be easily adapted to examine the function of neurons in other brain regions.
BACKGROUND: Electrophysiological recording approaches are essential for understanding brain function. Among these approaches are various methods of performing single-unit recordings. However, a major hurdle to overcome when recording single units in vivo is stability. Poor stability results in a low signal-to-noise ratio, which makes it challenging to isolate neuronal signals. Proper isolation is needed for differentiating a signal from neighboring cells or the noise inherent to electrophysiology. Insufficient isolation makes it impossible to analyze full action potential waveforms. A common source of instability is an inadequate surgery. Problems during surgery cause blood loss, tissue damage and poor healing of the surrounding tissue, limited access to the target brain region, and, importantly, unreliable fixation points for holding the mouse's head. NEW METHOD: We describe an optimized surgical procedure that ensures limited tissue damage and delineate a method for implanting head plates to hold the animal firmly in place. RESULTS: Using the cerebellum as a model, we implement an extracellular recording technique to acquire single units from Purkinje cells and cerebellar nuclear neurons in behaving mice. We validate the stability of our method by holding single units after injecting the powerful tremorgenic drug harmaline. We performed multiple structural analyses after recording. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Our approach is ideal for studying neuronal function in active mice and valuable for recording single-neuron activity when considerable motion is unavoidable. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical principles we present for accessing the cerebellum can be easily adapted to examine the function of neurons in other brain regions.
Authors: Ka Hung Lee; Paul J Mathews; Alexander M B Reeves; Katrina Y Choe; Shekib A Jami; Raul E Serrano; Thomas S Otis Journal: Neuron Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Joshua J White; Marife Arancillo; Trace L Stay; Nicholas A George-Jones; Sabrina L Levy; Detlef H Heck; Roy V Sillitoe Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Tycho M Hoogland; Jornt R De Gruijl; Laurens Witter; Cathrin B Canto; Chris I De Zeeuw Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Sharon R Stevens; Meike E van der Heijden; Yuki Ogawa; Tao Lin; Roy V Sillitoe; Matthew N Rasband Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 6.709
Authors: Shreya Mahajan; John K Hermann; Hillary W Bedell; Jonah A Sharkins; Lei Chen; Keying Chen; Seth M Meade; Cara S Smith; Jacob Rayyan; He Feng; Youjoung Kim; Matthew A Schiefer; Dawn M Taylor; Jeffrey R Capadona; Evon S Ereifej Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2020-05-08
Authors: Amanda M Brown; Marife Arancillo; Tao Lin; Daniel R Catt; Joy Zhou; Elizabeth P Lackey; Trace L Stay; Zhongyuan Zuo; Joshua J White; Roy V Sillitoe Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Meike E van der Heijden; Dominic J Kizek; Ross Perez; Elena K Ruff; Michelle E Ehrlich; Roy V Sillitoe Journal: J Physiol Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 5.182