Literature DB >> 26777071

Scale Reliability, Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha, and Violations of Essential Tau-Equivalence with Fixed Congeneric Components.

T Raykov.   

Abstract

The population discrepancy between Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha and scale reliability with fixed congeneric measures, uncorrelated errors, and sampling of subjects is studied. This difference is expressed in terms of individual component violations of the assumption of essential T-equivalence that is necessary and sufficient for Alpha to equal composite reliability. An upper bound of the discrepancy is obtained and its magnitude assessed in practical contexts of informed scale development. As an alternative when the difference may be considerable, a latent variable model is recommended for estimating scale reliability.

Year:  1997        PMID: 26777071     DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3204_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  48 in total

1.  Hypothesis testing for coefficient alpha: an SEM approach.

Authors:  Alberto Maydeu-Olivares; Donna L Coffman; Carlos García-Forero; David Gallardo-Pujol
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-05

2.  Measuring a New Stress Domain: Validation of the Couple-Level Minority Stress Scale.

Authors:  Torsten B Neilands; Allen J LeBlanc; David M Frost; Kayla Bowen; Patrick S Sullivan; Colleen C Hoff; Jason Chang
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2019-09-24

3.  Multiple-Component Measurement Instruments in Heterogeneous Populations: Is There a Single Coefficient Alpha?

Authors:  Tenko Raykov; George A Marcoulides; Michael Harrison; Natalja Menold
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Psychometric Properties of Measures of Team Diversity With Likert Data.

Authors:  Lifang Deng; George A Marcoulides; Ke-Hai Yuan
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  Robust Coefficients Alpha and Omega and Confidence Intervals With Outlying Observations and Missing Data: Methods and Software.

Authors:  Zhiyong Zhang; Ke-Hai Yuan
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  Testing the Difference Between Reliability Coefficients Alpha and Omega.

Authors:  Lifang Deng; Wai Chan
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.821

7.  A Direct Latent Variable Modeling Based Method for Point and Interval Estimation of Coefficient Alpha.

Authors:  Tenko Raykov; George A Marcoulides
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.821

8.  CFA Models with a General Factor and Multiple Sets of Secondary Factors.

Authors:  Minjeong Jeon; Frank Rijmen; Sophia Rabe-Hesketh
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Development and psychometric validation of a novel measure of sensory expectancies associated with E-cigarette use.

Authors:  Meghan E Morean; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Steve Sussman; Jonathan Foulds; Howard Fishbein; Rachel Grana; Bonnie Halpern-Felsher; Hyoshin Kim; Scott R Weaver; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.913

10.  Assessing risk of bias in randomized controlled trials of methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Authors:  Raíssa Rodrigues-Tartari; Walter Swardfager; Giovanni A Salum; Luís A Rohde; Hugo Cogo-Moreira
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.