Literature DB >> 26776945

How well do contoured superior midshaft clavicle plates fit the clavicle? A cadaveric study.

Amar M Malhas1, Yiannis G Skarparis2, Sankar Sripada2, Roger W Soames3, Arpit C Jariwala2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the degree of variation in clavicular morphology, 4 clavicle plating systems were examined for their congruity as superior, midshaft, anatomic clavicle (SMAC) plates in a cadaveric study.
METHODS: SMAC plates from 4 manufacturers were applied to 79 dry right human clavicles. Two systems offered multiple (4) variations of plates (MP), 1 offered two variations (TP), and 1 had a single plate (SP). Two examiners applied and clamped the best-fitting plate from each system onto each of the 79 clavicles and then graded them: 1, poor fit; 2, good fit; and 3, anatomic fit. Each examiner repeated the process to assess intraobserver and interobserver reliability. The scores were averaged to produce a final score for each system for each clavicle.
RESULTS: The MP systems scored the highest (32%-37% anatomic, 54%-63% good, 5%-8% poor), followed by the TP system (30% anatomic, 53% good, 17% poor), and finally the SP system (9% anatomic, 59% good, 32% poor). Of note, clavicular length significantly correlated with a higher degree of conformity in all plating systems (Spearman rank correlation P < .05 for each system). In clavicles longer than 150 mm, the MP and TP systems performed identically, with the SP system close behind. Contouring of the plate is needed in 73% of cases overall.
CONCLUSION: Plating systems with multiple plate shape variations are more advantageous when dealing with smaller-sized clavicles, typically in females. However, when dealing with larger clavicles, there was no real difference.
Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cadaveric; Clavicle; Fracture; Plate fixation; Shoulder; Trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26776945     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes, complications, and implant removals in anatomically pre-contoured clavicle plates versus reconstruction plates - a propensity score matched retrospective cohort study of 106 patients.

Authors:  Christian X Fang; Ruiping Liu; Dennis K H Yee; Jackie Chau; Tak-Wing Lau; Rebecca Chan; Siu-Bon Woo; Tak-Man Wong; Evan Fang; Frankie Leung
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Variation of the clavicle's muscle insertion footprints - a cadaveric study.

Authors:  M Herteleer; S Vancleef; P Herijgers; J Duflou; I Jonkers; J Vander Sloten; S Nijs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Are two plates better than one? A systematic review of dual plating for acute midshaft clavicle fractures.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Claire E Fernandez; Allison M Morgan; Patrick Henry; Diane Nam
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2021-03-17

4.  A Biomechanical and Clinical Comparison of Midshaft Clavicle Plate Fixation: Are 2 Screws as Good as 3 on Each Side of the Fracture?

Authors:  Christopher G Larsen; Brian Sleasman; Steven C Chudik
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.