Literature DB >> 26776930

Estimation of musculotendon parameters for scaled and subject specific musculoskeletal models using an optimization technique.

Luca Modenese1, Elena Ceseracciu2, Monica Reggiani2, David G Lloyd3.   

Abstract

A challenging aspect of subject specific musculoskeletal modeling is the estimation of muscle parameters, especially optimal fiber length and tendon slack length. In this study, the method for scaling musculotendon parameters published by Winby et al. (2008), J. Biomech. 41, 1682-1688, has been reformulated, generalized and applied to two cases of practical interest: 1) the adjustment of muscle parameters in the entire lower limb following linear scaling of a generic model and 2) their estimation "from scratch" in a subject specific model of the hip joint created from medical images. In the first case, the procedure maintained the muscles׳ operating range between models with mean errors below 2.3% of the reference model normalized fiber length value. In the second case, a subject specific model of the hip joint was created using segmented bone geometries and muscle volumes publicly available for a cadaveric specimen from the Living Human Digital Library (LHDL). Estimated optimal fiber lengths were found to be consistent with those of a previously published dataset for all 27 considered muscle bundles except gracilis. However, computed tendon slack lengths differed from tendon lengths measured in the LHDL cadaver, suggesting that tendon slack length should be determined via optimization in subject-specific applications. Overall, the presented methodology could adjust the parameters of a scaled model and enabled the estimation of muscle parameters in newly created subject specific models. All data used in the analyses are of public domain and a tool implementing the algorithm is available at https://simtk.org/home/opt_muscle_par.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip joint; Muscle models; Muscle–tendon parameters; Optimal fiber length; Parameter optimization; Scaling; Subject specific; Tendon slack length

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26776930     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  20 in total

1.  Greater magnitude tibiofemoral contact forces are associated with reduced prevalence of osteochondral pathologies 2-3 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  David John Saxby; Adam L Bryant; Ans Van Ginckel; Yuanyuan Wang; Xinyang Wang; Luca Modenese; Pauline Gerus; Jason M Konrath; Karine Fortin; Tim V Wrigley; Kim L Bennell; Flavia M Cicuttini; Christopher Vertullo; Julian A Feller; Tim Whitehead; Price Gallie; David G Lloyd
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Computational modelling of muscle fibre operating ranges in the hindlimb of a small ground bird (Eudromia elegans), with implications for modelling locomotion in extinct species.

Authors:  Peter J Bishop; Krijn B Michel; Antoine Falisse; Andrew R Cuff; Vivian R Allen; Friedl De Groote; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Quantitative assessment of training effects using EksoGT® exoskeleton in Parkinson's disease patients: A randomized single blind clinical trial.

Authors:  M Romanato; F Spolaor; C Beretta; F Fichera; A Bertoldo; D Volpe; Z Sawacha
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-05-25

4.  Tibiofemoral contact force differences between flat flexible and stable supportive walking shoes in people with varus-malaligned medial knee osteoarthritis: A randomized cross-over study.

Authors:  Scott Starkey; Rana Hinman; Kade Paterson; David Saxby; Gabrielle Knox; Michelle Hall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Biofeedback for Gait Retraining Based on Real-Time Estimation of Tibiofemoral Joint Contact Forces.

Authors:  Claudio Pizzolato; Monica Reggiani; David J Saxby; Elena Ceseracciu; Luca Modenese; David G Lloyd
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Anthropometric scaling of musculoskeletal models of the hand captures age-dependent differences in lateral pinch force.

Authors:  Tamara Ordonez Diaz; Jennifer A Nichols
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Sensitivity of a juvenile subject-specific musculoskeletal model of the ankle joint to the variability of operator-dependent input.

Authors:  Iain Hannah; Erica Montefiori; Luca Modenese; Joe Prinold; Marco Viceconti; Claudia Mazzà
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.617

8.  Muscle contributions to medial tibiofemoral compartment contact loading following ACL reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts.

Authors:  Jason M Konrath; David J Saxby; Bryce A Killen; Claudio Pizzolato; Christopher J Vertullo; Rod S Barrett; David G Lloyd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The influence of muscle pennation angle and cross-sectional area on contact forces in the ankle joint.

Authors:  Ran S Sopher; Andrew A Amis; D Ceri Davies; Jonathan Rt Jeffers
Journal:  J Strain Anal Eng Des       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 1.541

10.  Wearables-Only Analysis of Muscle and Joint Mechanics: An EMG-Driven Approach.

Authors:  Reed D Gurchiek; Nicole Donahue; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Ryan S McGinnis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.