Literature DB >> 26776929

Quantification of muscle co-contraction using supersonic shear wave imaging.

Brent J Raiteri1, François Hug2, Andrew G Cresswell1, Glen A Lichtwark3.   

Abstract

Muscle stiffness estimated using shear wave elastography can provide an index of individual muscle force during isometric contraction and may therefore be a promising method for quantifying co-contraction. We estimated the shear modulus of the lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscle using supersonic shear wave imaging and measured its myoelectrical activity using surface electromyography (sEMG) during graded isometric contractions of plantar flexion and dorsiflexion (n=7). During dorsiflexion, the average shear modulus was 26 ± 6 kPa at peak sEMG amplitude, which was significantly less (P=0.02) than that measured at the same sEMG level during plantar flexion (42 ± 10 kPa). The passive tension during contraction was estimated using the passive LG muscle shear modulus during a passive ankle rotation measured at an equivalent ankle angle to that measured during contraction. The passive shear modulus increased significantly (P<0.01) from the plantar flexed position (16 ± 5 kPa) to the dorsiflexed position (26 ± 9 kPa). Once this change in passive tension from joint rotation was accounted for, the average LG muscle shear modulus due to active contraction was significantly greater (P<0.01) during plantar flexion (26 ± 8 kPa) than at sEMG-matched levels of dorsiflexion (0 ± 4 kPa). The negligible shear modulus estimated during isometric dorsiflexion indicates negligible active force contribution by the LG muscle, despite measured sEMG activity of 19% of maximal voluntary plantar flexion contraction. This strongly suggests that the sEMG activity recorded from the LG muscle during isometric dorsiflexion was primarily due to cross-talk. However, it is clear that passive muscle tension changes can contribute to joint torque during isometric dorsiflexion.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antagonist muscle force; Elastography; Gastrocnemius; Shear modulus; Stiffness

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26776929     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.12.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  Hamstring stiffness pattern during contraction in healthy individuals: analysis by ultrasound-based shear wave elastography.

Authors:  Bruno Mendes; Telmo Firmino; Raúl Oliveira; Tiago Neto; Jorge Infante; João R Vaz; Sandro R Freitas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Shear wave sonoelastography of skeletal muscle: basic principles, biomechanical concepts, clinical applications, and future perspectives.

Authors:  Maud Creze; Antoine Nordez; Marc Soubeyrand; Laurence Rocher; Xavier Maître; Marie-France Bellin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Muscle-tendon length and force affect human tibialis anterior central aponeurosis stiffness in vivo.

Authors:  Brent James Raiteri; Andrew Graham Cresswell; Glen Anthony Lichtwark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Fit to Burst: Toward Noninvasive Estimation of Achilles Tendon Load Using Burst Vibrations.

Authors:  Nicholas B Bolus; Hyeon Ki Jeong; Bradley M Blaho; Mohsen Safaei; Aaron J Young; Omer T Inan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Mapping of Back Muscle Stiffness along Spine during Standing and Lying in Young Adults: A Pilot Study on Spinal Stiffness Quantification with Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Christina Zong-Hao Ma; Long-Jun Ren; Connie Lok-Kan Cheng; Yong-Ping Zheng
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.