Daniel J Ikeda1, David G Buckler1, Jiaqi Li1, Amit K Agarwal1, Laura J Di Taranti1, James Kurtz2, Ryan Dos Reis2, Marion Leary3, Benjamin S Abella1, Audrey L Blewer4. 1. Center for Resuscitation Science and Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Center for Resuscitation Science and Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Center for Resuscitation Science and Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: audrey.blewer@uphs.upenn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) video self-instruction (VSI) materials have been promoted as a scalable approach to increase the prevalence of CPR skills among the lay public, in part due to the opportunity for secondary training (i.e., sharing of training materials). However, the motivations for, and barriers to, disseminating VSI materials to secondary trainees is poorly understood. METHODS: This work represents an ancillary investigation of a prospective hospital-based CPR education trial in which family members of cardiac patients were trained using VSI. Mixed-methods surveys were administered to primary trainees six months after initial enrollment. Surveys were designed to capture motivations for, and barriers to, sharing VSI materials, the number of secondary trainees with whom materials were shared, and the settings, timing, and recipients of trainings. RESULTS: Between 07/2012 and 05/2015, 653 study participants completed a six-month follow-up interview. Of those, 345 reported sharing VSI materials with 1455 secondary trainees. Materials were shared most commonly with family members. In a logistic regression analysis, participants in the oldest quartile (age >63 years) were less likely to share materials compared to those in the youngest quartile (age ≤ 44 years, OR 0.58, CI 0.37-0.90, p=0.02). Among the 308 participants who did not share their materials, time constraints was the most commonly cited barrier for not sharing. CONCLUSIONS: VSI materials represent a strategy for secondary dissemination of CPR training, yet older individuals have a lower likelihood of sharing relative to younger individuals. Further work is warranted to remedy perceived barriers to CPR dissemination among the lay public using VSI approaches.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) video self-instruction (VSI) materials have been promoted as a scalable approach to increase the prevalence of CPR skills among the lay public, in part due to the opportunity for secondary training (i.e., sharing of training materials). However, the motivations for, and barriers to, disseminating VSI materials to secondary trainees is poorly understood. METHODS: This work represents an ancillary investigation of a prospective hospital-based CPR education trial in which family members of cardiac patients were trained using VSI. Mixed-methods surveys were administered to primary trainees six months after initial enrollment. Surveys were designed to capture motivations for, and barriers to, sharing VSI materials, the number of secondary trainees with whom materials were shared, and the settings, timing, and recipients of trainings. RESULTS: Between 07/2012 and 05/2015, 653 study participants completed a six-month follow-up interview. Of those, 345 reported sharing VSI materials with 1455 secondary trainees. Materials were shared most commonly with family members. In a logistic regression analysis, participants in the oldest quartile (age >63 years) were less likely to share materials compared to those in the youngest quartile (age ≤ 44 years, OR 0.58, CI 0.37-0.90, p=0.02). Among the 308 participants who did not share their materials, time constraints was the most commonly cited barrier for not sharing. CONCLUSIONS: VSI materials represent a strategy for secondary dissemination of CPR training, yet older individuals have a lower likelihood of sharing relative to younger individuals. Further work is warranted to remedy perceived barriers to CPR dissemination among the lay public using VSI approaches.
Authors: Bonnie Lynch; Eric L Einspruch; Graham Nichol; Lance B Becker; Tom P Aufderheide; Ahamed Idris Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Andrew J Bouland; Nicholas Risko; Benjamin J Lawner; Kevin G Seaman; Cassandra M Godar; Matthew J Levy Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Benjamin S Abella; Tom P Aufderheide; Brian Eigel; Robert W Hickey; W T Longstreth; Vinay Nadkarni; Graham Nichol; Michael R Sayre; Claire E Sommargren; Mary Fran Hazinski Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert Swor; Iftikhar Khan; Robert Domeier; Linda Honeycutt; Kevin Chu; Scott Compton Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2006-04-13 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Marion Leary; David G Buckler; Daniel J Ikeda; Daiane A Saraiva; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Audrey L Blewer; Benjamin S Abella Journal: World J Emerg Med Date: 2017