L J Wilkie1, K Smith2, V Luis Fuentes3. 1. Department of Clinical Sciences and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, UK. 2. Department of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, The Royal Veterinary College, UK. 3. Department of Clinical Sciences and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, UK. Electronic address: vluisfuentes@rvc.ac.uk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To report necropsy and myocardial histopathology in cats with unexpected death and expected death/euthanasia, comparing findings in 4 groups of cats: unexpected death with noncardiac disease (UD-NC); unexpected death with cardiac disease (UD-C); expected death/euthanasia due to noncardiac disease with incidental cardiac disease (OD + HD); and expected death/euthanasia due to congestive heart failure (CHF). ANIMALS: Two hundred fifty-two cats undergoing necropsy at a single centre. METHODS: Signalment, history, body weight, heart weight and myocardial thickness were obtained from medical records. Cardiac histopathology slides were reviewed blindly by a single observer. Data were analysed using a Chi squared, Fisher's exact, Kruskal-Wallis tests or ANOVA as appropriate. RESULTS: Death at a veterinary clinic and suspected poisoning were the most common reasons for necropsy in 158 cats with an unexpected death. No cause other than cardiac disease was found in 87/158 (55.1%), with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy identified in 68/87 (78%) of UD-C cats. Expected deaths or euthanasia occurred in 27 cats with CHF and 67 cats with concurrent heart disease (OD + HD). Myofiber disarray, interstitial fibrosis, subendocardial fibrosis and intramural arteriolosclerosis were more prevalent in UD-C cats than in UD-NC cats, and subendocardial fibrosis and arteriolosclerosis were more prevalent in UD-C cats than in CHF and OD + HD cats. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac disease, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in particular, was commonly present in cats that died unexpectedly in this study population. Subendocardial fibrosis and intramural arteriolosclerosis were more common in cats with unexpected death with cardiac disease than in other cats.
OBJECTIVES: To report necropsy and myocardial histopathology in cats with unexpected death and expected death/euthanasia, comparing findings in 4 groups of cats: unexpected death with noncardiac disease (UD-NC); unexpected death with cardiac disease (UD-C); expected death/euthanasia due to noncardiac disease with incidental cardiac disease (OD + HD); and expected death/euthanasia due to congestive heart failure (CHF). ANIMALS: Two hundred fifty-two cats undergoing necropsy at a single centre. METHODS: Signalment, history, body weight, heart weight and myocardial thickness were obtained from medical records. Cardiac histopathology slides were reviewed blindly by a single observer. Data were analysed using a Chi squared, Fisher's exact, Kruskal-Wallis tests or ANOVA as appropriate. RESULTS:Death at a veterinary clinic and suspected poisoning were the most common reasons for necropsy in 158 cats with an unexpected death. No cause other than cardiac disease was found in 87/158 (55.1%), with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy identified in 68/87 (78%) of UD-C cats. Expected deaths or euthanasia occurred in 27 cats with CHF and 67 cats with concurrent heart disease (OD + HD). Myofiber disarray, interstitial fibrosis, subendocardial fibrosis and intramural arteriolosclerosis were more prevalent in UD-C cats than in UD-NC cats, and subendocardial fibrosis and arteriolosclerosis were more prevalent in UD-C cats than in CHF and OD + HDcats. CONCLUSIONS:Cardiac disease, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in particular, was commonly present in cats that died unexpectedly in this study population. Subendocardial fibrosis and intramural arteriolosclerosis were more common in cats with unexpected death with cardiac disease than in other cats.
Authors: Wan-Ching Cheng; Lois Wilkie; Tsumugi Anne Kurosawa; Melanie Dobromylskyj; Simon Lawrence Priestnall; Virginia Luis Fuentes; David J Connolly Journal: Animals (Basel) Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 2.752
Authors: Andrew E Messer; Jasmine Chan; Alex Daley; O'Neal Copeland; Steven B Marston; David J Connolly Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Kieran Borgeat; Stijn J M Niessen; Lois Wilkie; Norelene Harrington; David B Church; Virginia Luis Fuentes; David J Connolly Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jessica L Ward; Gregory R Lisciandro; Wendy A Ware; Austin K Viall; Brent D Aona; Kari A Kurtz; Yamir Reina-Doreste; Teresa C DeFrancesco Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Kerry A Loughran; John E Rush; Elizabeth A Rozanski; Mark A Oyama; Éva Larouche-Lebel; Marc S Kraus Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Virginia Luis Fuentes; Jonathan Abbott; Valérie Chetboul; Etienne Côté; Philip R Fox; Jens Häggström; Mark D Kittleson; Karsten Schober; Joshua A Stern Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Mengmeng Liu; Liza S Köster; Geoffrey T Fosgate; Christopher C Chadwick; Íñigo Sanz-González; Peter David Eckersall; Paul R Wotton; Anne T French Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Ingrid van Hoek; Hannah Hodgkiss-Geere; Elizabeth F Bode; Julie Hamilton-Elliott; Paul Mõtsküla; Valentina Palermo; Yolanda Martinez Pereira; Geoff J Culshaw; Jeremy Laxalde; Joanna Dukes-McEwan Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 3.333