Literature DB >> 26776299

Associations between belief in conspiracy theories and the maladaptive personality traits of the personality inventory for DSM-5.

Viren Swami1, Laura Weis2, Alixe Lay3, David Barron4, Adrian Furnham2.   

Abstract

Conspiracy theories can be treated as both rational narratives of the world as well as outcomes of underlying maladaptive traits. Here, we examined associations between belief in conspiracy theories and individual differences in personality disorders. An Internet-based sample (N=259) completed measures of belief in conspiracy theories and the 25 facets of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Preliminary analyses showed no significant differences in belief in conspiracy theories across participant sex, ethnicity, and education. Regression analyses showed that the PID-5 facets of Unusual Beliefs and Experiences and, to a lesser extent, Suspiciousness, significantly predicted belief in conspiracy theories. These findings highlight a role for maladaptive personality traits in understanding belief in conspiracy theories, but require further investigation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conspiracy theories; Maladaptive traits; Personality disorders; Suspiciousness; Unusual beliefs

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26776299     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  10 in total

Review 1.  A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.

Authors:  Johannes Zimmermann; André Kerber; Katharina Rek; Christopher J Hopwood; Robert F Krueger
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  COVID-19 conspiracy ideation is associated with the delusion proneness trait and resistance to update of beliefs.

Authors:  A V Lebedev; P Petrovic; K Acar; O Horntvedt; A Cabrera; A Olsson; M Ingvar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  An examination of the factorial and convergent validity of four measures of conspiracist ideation, with recommendations for researchers.

Authors:  Viren Swami; David Barron; Laura Weis; Martin Voracek; Stefan Stieger; Adrian Furnham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs: Field Characteristics, Measurement Instruments, and Associations With Personality Traits.

Authors:  Andreas Goreis; Martin Voracek
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-11

5.  Psychometric assessments of Persian translations of three measures of conspiracist beliefs.

Authors:  Mohammad Atari; Reza Afhami; Viren Swami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Just world beliefs, personal success and beliefs in conspiracy theories.

Authors:  Adrian Furnham
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2021-03-18

7.  Conspiracy endorsement and its associations with personality functioning, anxiety, loneliness, and sociodemographic characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic in a representative sample of the German population.

Authors:  Nora Hettich; Manfred E Beutel; Mareike Ernst; Clara Schliessler; Hanna Kampling; Johannes Kruse; Elmar Braehler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  COVID-19 Scientific Facts vs. Conspiracy Theories: Is Science Failing to Pass Its Message?

Authors:  Marios Constantinou; Antonios Kagialis; Maria Karekla
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Belief in a COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory as a Predictor of Mental Health and Well-Being of Health Care Workers in Ecuador: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Stephen X Zhang; Asghar Afshar Jahanshahi; Aldo Alvarez-Risco; Huiyang Dai; Jizhen Li; Verónica García Ibarra
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2020-07-21

10.  Psychometric assessment of the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale.

Authors:  Kenneth Graham Drinkwater; Neil Dagnall; Andrew Denovan; Nick Neave
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.