Literature DB >> 26775930

Is it worth screening for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium colonization?: Financial burden of screening in a developing country.

Aysegul Ulu-Kilic1, Esra Özhan2, Dilek Altun2, Duygu Perçin3, Tamer Güneş4, Emine Alp5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The screening of critically ill patients at high risk of vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) colonization, to detect and isolate colonized patients, is recommended to prevent and control the transmission of VRE. Screening asymptomatic carriers brings financial burden for institutions. In this study, we performed risk analysis for VRE colonization and determined the financial burden of screening in a middle-income country, Turkey.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the VRE surveillance data from a pediatric hospital between 2010 and 2014. A case-control study was conducted to identify the risk factors of colonization. Total cost of VRE screening and additional costs for a VRE colonized patient (including active surveillance cultures and contact isolation) were calculated.
RESULTS: During the 4-year period, 6,372 patients were screened for perirectal VRE colonization. The rate of culture-positive specimens among all patients screened was 239 (3.75%). The rate of VRE infection was 0.04% (n = 3) among all patients screened. Length of hospital stay, malignancy, and being transferred from another institution were independently associated risk factors for colonization. Annual estimated costs for the laboratory were projected as $19,074 (76,295/4) for all patients screened. Cost of contact isolation for each patient colonized in a ward and an intensive care unit was $270 and $718, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In developing countries, institutions should identify their own high-risk patients; screening priorities should be based on prevalence of infection and hospital financial resources.
Copyright © 2016 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterococcus faecium; Vancomycin-resistance; colonization; pediatrics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26775930     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  5 in total

1.  High frequency of vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecalis in children: an alarming concern.

Authors:  F Sabouni; Z Movahedi; S Mahmoudi; B Pourakbari; S Keshavarz Valian; S Mamishi
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2016-12

2.  Detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in stool specimens submitted for Clostridium difficile toxin testing.

Authors:  Sevim Özsoy; Arzu İlki
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 2.476

3.  Evaluation of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry assisted, selective broth method to screen for vancomycin-resistant enterococci in patients at high risk.

Authors:  Tsi-Shu Huang; Susan Shin-Jung Lee; Chia-Chien Lee; Chiu-Yen Chen; Fang-Chen Chen; Bao-Chen Chen; Cheng Len Sy; Kuan-Sheng Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates in a tertiary care hospital in southern Thailand: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Phanvasri Saengsuwan; Kamonnut Singkhamanan; Siribhorn Madla; Natnicha Ingviya; Chonticha Romyasamit
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Distinguishing Clinical Enterococcus faecium Strains and Resistance to Vancomycin Using a Simple In-House Screening Test.

Authors:  Natkamon Saenhom; Parichart Boueroy; Peechanika Chopjitt; Rujirat Hatrongjit; Anusak Kerdsin
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.