| Literature DB >> 26775712 |
Xiaona Zhang1, Daochao Jin1, Xiao Zou2, Jianjun Guo1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The two-spotted mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, is one of the most serious mite pests of crops throughout the world. Biocontrol of the mite with fungal agents has long been paid much attention because of the development of insecticide resistance and the severe restriction of chemical pesticides. In this study, the efficacy of submerged conidia of the entomopathogenic fungus Isaria cateniannulata strain 08XS-1 against T. urticae eggs, larvae and female adults was evaluated at different temperatures and humidity in the laboratory and under field conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Isaria cateniannulata; Tetranychus urticae; entomopathogenic fungus; field control; infection
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26775712 PMCID: PMC5069562 DOI: 10.1002/ps.4233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pest Manag Sci ISSN: 1526-498X Impact factor: 4.845
Local weather data during the field experiment (18–30 July 2013)
| Date (days) | Weather | Temperature (°C) | Humidity (%) | Date (days) | Weather | Temperature (°C) | Humidity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | Cloudy | 18–25 | 73–92 | 24 | Cloudy | 22–29 | 78–92 |
| 19 | Light rain | 18–22 | 92–99 | 25 | Cloudy | 22–29 | 50–90 |
| 20 | Cloudy | 22–29 | 56–90 | 26 | Cloudy | 22–33 | 52–89 |
| 21 | Cloudy | 22–30 | 76–98 | 27 | Cloudy | 22–30 | 54–85 |
| 22 | Cloudy | 22–29 | 64–92 | 28 | Rain shower | 22–29 | 82–89 |
| 23 | Cloudy | 22–32 | 61–86 | 29 | Cloudy | 22–29 | 74–95 |
Figure 1Embryonic development of T. urticae eggs infected by I. cateniannulata. A to F: embryonic development at 12, 24, 48, 96, 120 and 144 h after treatment with a submerged conidial suspension of I. cateniannulata. Scale bars: 20 µm.
LC50 linear regression of the mortality of T. urticae infected with I. cateniannulata under various humidity conditions at 15 °C
| Mite state | Humidity (%) | Regression equation ( | LC50 (submerged conidia mL−1) × 102 | 95% CL |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 100 | 0.378 | 6.516 | 6.191–6.890 | 5.903 |
| Female | 95 | 0.389 | 7.788 | 7.366–8.408 | 4.613 |
| Female | 85 | 0.384 | 8.708 | 8.117–9.703 | 2.971 |
| Female | 75 | 0.483 | 9.467 | 8.736–10.939 | 5.686 |
| Larva | 100 | 0.315 | 4.694 | 4.278–5.014 | 3.888 |
| Larva | 95 | 0.245 | 6.095 | 5.747–6.454 | 2.581 |
| Larva | 85 | 0.260 | 7.559 | 7.151–8.140 | 3.130 |
| Larva | 75 | 0.316 | 10.122 | 9.296–11.530 | 2.662 |
| Egg | 100 | 0.383 | 9.594 | 8.963–10.597 | 4.572 |
| Egg | 95 | 0.391 | 10.135 | 9.353–11.494 | 4.069 |
| Egg | 85 | 0.409 | 10.271 | 9.446–11.760 | 5.346 |
| Egg | 75 | 0.400 | 11.132 | 9.933–13.817 | 4.267 |
LC50 linear regression of the mortality of T. urticae infected with I. cateniannulata under various humidity conditions at 20 °C
| Mite state | Humidity (%) | Regression equation ( | LC50 (submerged conidia mL−1) × 102 | 95% CL |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 100 | 0.292 | 3.927 | 2.930–4.512 | 3.793 |
| Female | 95 | 0.290 | 4.723 | 4.026–5.189 | 3.287 |
| Female | 85 | 0.220 | 5.280 | 4.509–5.819 | 2.421 |
| Female | 75 | 0.297 | 6.368 | 5.964–6.832 | 2.416 |
| Larva | 100 | 0.919 | 4.169 | 3.984–4.321 | 4.295 |
| Larva | 95 | 0.673 | 4.674 | 4.486–4.839 | 4.655 |
| Larva | 85 | 0.585 | 5.585 | 5.420–5.744 | 3.060 |
| Larva | 75 | 0.530 | 6.588 | 6.413–6.776 | 3.252 |
| Egg | 100 | 0.353 | 8.942 | 8.430–9.705 | 2.701 |
| Egg | 95 | 0.352 | 9.395 | 8.788–10.344 | 4.560 |
| Egg | 85 | 0.333 | 10.436 | 9.530–12.043 | 2.847 |
| Egg | 75 | 0.377 | 11.181 | 9.977–13.784 | 3.436 |
LC50 linear regression of the mortality of T. urticae infected with I. cateniannulata under different humidity conditions at 25 °C
| Mite state | Humidity (%) | Regression equation ( | LC50 (submerged conidia mL−1) × 102 | 95% CL |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 100 | 0.774 | 3.539 | 2.962–3.890 | 3.970 |
| Female | 94 | 0.744 | 3.895 | 3.481–4.181 | 4.705 |
| Female | 84 | 0.407 | 4.230 | 3.646–4.633 | 4.752 |
| Female | 75 | 0.470 | 5.937 | 5.664–6.208 | 5.019 |
| Larva | 100 | 0.663 | 3.097 | 2.522–3.472 | 5.815 |
| Larva | 94 | 0.449 | 3.123 | 2.498–3.554 | 5.537 |
| Larva | 84 | 0.449 | 5.493 | 5.278–5.692 | 4.421 |
| Larva | 75 | 0.310 | 6.226 | 5.952–6.516 | 4.593 |
| Egg | 100 | 0.397 | 6.805 | 6.574–7.071 | 2.832 |
| Egg | 94 | 0.385 | 7.734 | 7.426–8.136 | 3.119 |
| Egg | 84 | 0.417 | 8.820 | 8.381–9.455 | 3.725 |
| Egg | 75 | 0.446 | 10.174 | 9.385–11.616 | 3.387 |
LC50 linear regression of the mortality of T. urticae infected with I. cateniannulata under different humidity conditions at 30 °C
| Mite state | Humidity (%) | Regression equation ( | LC50 (submerged conidia mL−1) × 102 | 95% CL |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 100 | 0.315 | 8.616 | 7.957–9.775 | 2.595 |
| Female | 97 | 0.363 | 9.013 | 8.327–10.233 | 3.081 |
| Female | 83 | 0.327 | 10.048 | 9.004–12.296 | 3.298 |
| Female | 75 | 0.318 | 10.751 | 9.419–14.079 | 5.205 |
| Larva | 100 | 0.539 | 7.196 | 7.002–7.420 | 3.598 |
| Larva | 97 | 0.383 | 8.921 | 8.439–9.630 | 2.544 |
| Larva | 83 | 0.515 | 9.677 | 9.061–10.746 | 4.601 |
| Larva | 75 | 0.615 | 9.938 | 9.196–11.566 | 3.277 |
| Egg | 100 | 0.432 | 9.463 | 8.893–10.361 | 4.370 |
| Egg | 97 | 0.403 | 9.899 | 9.193–11.087 | 4.843 |
| Egg | 83 | 0.463 | 10.638 | 9.632–12.842 | 3.375 |
| Egg | 75 | 0.508 | 11.212 | 9.769–16.632 | 3.733 |
LC50 linear regression of the mortality of T. urticae infected with I. cateniannulata under different humidity conditions at 35 °C
| Mite state | Humidity (%) | Regression equation ( | LC50 (submerged conidia mL−1) × 102 | 95% CL |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 100 | 0.363 | 10.147 | 9.106–12.434 | 4.299 |
| Female | 97 | 0.376 | 11.057 | 9.590–15.476 | 3.430 |
| Female | 83 | 0.481 | 10.824 | 9.399–16.715 | 4.768 |
| Female | 75 | 0.383 | 12.202 | 9.899–31.904 | 3.974 |
| Larva | 100 | 0.567 | 9.561 | 8.988–10.565 | 4.123 |
| Larva | 97 | 0.594 | 9.848 | 9.153–11.260 | 2.312 |
| Larva | 83 | 0.558 | 10.568 | 9.503–13.562 | 3.110 |
| Larva | 75 | 0.745 | 9.979 | 9.115–12.922 | 3.557 |
| Egg | 100 | 0.432 | 9.948 | 9.237–11.172 | 3.214 |
| Egg | 97 | 0.415 | 10.506 | 9.586–12.280 | 5.072 |
| Egg | 83 | 0.405 | 11.685 | 10.139–16.176 | 3.027 |
| Egg | 75 | 0.724 | 11.060 | — | 2.987 |
Figure 2Mortality of T. urticae infected with a suspension of 2 × 108 submerged conidia mL−1 at different temperatures and 100% humidity.
Population densities of T. urticae in three vegetable fields treated with submerged conidial suspension of I. cateniannulata a
| Treatment | Live population of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 days | 2 days | 4 days | 6 days | 8 days | 10 days | |
| Cucumber | 124.333 ± 3.844 a | 106.333 ± 3.179 b | 64.000 ± 2.516 c | 30.333 ± 0.881 d | 22.000 ± 1.154 e | 18.000 ± 0.577 e |
| CK1 | 128.333 ± 1.667 c | 132.000 ± 1.154 c | 145.333 ± 2.905 b | 147.333 ± 1.452 b | 168.000 ± 1.527 a | 161.333 ± 3.527 a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Eggplant | 123.667 ± 0.881 a | 103.667 ± 1.855 b | 73.000 ± 3.511 c | 66.000 ± 0.577 d | 44.000 ± 0.577 e | 22.000 ± 0.577 f |
| CK2 | 128.333 ± 1.667 c | 132.000 ± 1.154 c | 145.333 ± 2.905 b | 147.333 ± 1.452 b | 168.000 ± 1.527 a | 161.333 ± 3.527 a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bean | 124.333 ± 1.452 a | 116.667 ± 0.881 b | 89.667 ± 0.881 c | 56.000 ± 1.527 d | 32.000 ± 0.577 e | 25.667 ± 1.855 f |
| CK3 | 125.333 ± 2.403 d | 126.667 ± 1.201 d | 132.333 ± 1.201 c | 137.333 ± 0.881 b | 148.333 ± 0.881 a | 151.667 ± 1.667 a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The data are presented as the mean ± SE. The same letters in the same column represent no significant differences between the groups at the P = 0.05 level by Duncan's multiple range Test (DMRT).
The relative control efficacy and population decline rate of T. urticae after spraying with submerged conidial suspension of I. cateniannulata a
| Treatment | Relative efficacy (%) | Population decline rate (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 days | 6 days | 10 days | 2 days | 6 days | 10 days | |
| Cucumber | 18.20 ± 2.41 c | 79.1 ± 0.77 b | 88.65 ± 0.51 a | 18.66 ± 1.30 c | 76.79 ± 0.43 b | 86.22 ± 0.45 a |
| Eggplant | 9.26 ± 1.92 c | 45.51 ± 0.86 b | 83.79 ± 0.71 a | 20.24 ± 1.71 c | 49.23 ± 0.21 b | 83.07 ± 0.48 a |
| Bean | 7.64 ± 1.23 c | 59.12 ± 1.04 b | 83.02 ± 1.28 a | 10.47 ± 1.20 c | 57.04 ± 0.93 b | 80.26 ± 1.54 a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The data are presented as the mean ± SE. The same letters in the same column represent no significant differences between the groups at the P = 0.05 level by DMRT.