OBJECTIVE: Despite influenza vaccination being an integral part of prenatal care, vaccination rates remain low. To evaluate the impact of pre-visit video education on patients' vaccination health beliefs and vaccination rate. STUDY DESIGN:From November 2013-January 2014 unvaccinated patients seen for routine prenatal carewere randomized into 2 study groups: pre-visit vaccination video education or control. Pre- and post-video health beliefs were assessed on a 5-point scale, and unvaccinated participants were subsequently interviewed by phone. RESULTS: In 105 randomized participants, intervention positively influenced health beliefs, as demonstrated by differences in mean pre- versus post-video scores for intervention versus control: vaccination may harm mother (difference = -0.05, p = 0.009) and baby (difference = -0.44, p = 0.015), and vaccination can protect mother (difference = 0.49, p = 0.003) and baby (difference = 0.59, p = 0.001). Vaccination rates were 28% intervention and 25% control (p = 0.70). Provider recommendation was associated with vaccination (47% if recommended vs. 12% if not, p < 0.001). Phone interviews revealed susceptibility, to influenza and vaccine safety as primary reasons for remaining unvaccinated. CONCLUSION:Video education positively influenced vaccination health beliefs without impacting vaccination rates. Physician's recommendation was strongly associated with participant's decision to become vaccinated and may be most effective when emphasizing influenza vaccination's protective impact on the newborn,.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Despite influenza vaccination being an integral part of prenatal care, vaccination rates remain low. To evaluate the impact of pre-visit video education on patients' vaccination health beliefs and vaccination rate. STUDY DESIGN: From November 2013-January 2014 unvaccinated patients seen for routine prenatal carewere randomized into 2 study groups: pre-visit vaccination video education or control. Pre- and post-video health beliefs were assessed on a 5-point scale, and unvaccinated participants were subsequently interviewed by phone. RESULTS: In 105 randomized participants, intervention positively influenced health beliefs, as demonstrated by differences in mean pre- versus post-video scores for intervention versus control: vaccination may harm mother (difference = -0.05, p = 0.009) and baby (difference = -0.44, p = 0.015), and vaccination can protect mother (difference = 0.49, p = 0.003) and baby (difference = 0.59, p = 0.001). Vaccination rates were 28% intervention and 25% control (p = 0.70). Provider recommendation was associated with vaccination (47% if recommended vs. 12% if not, p < 0.001). Phone interviews revealed susceptibility, to influenza and vaccine safety as primary reasons for remaining unvaccinated. CONCLUSION: Video education positively influenced vaccination health beliefs without impacting vaccination rates. Physician's recommendation was strongly associated with participant's decision to become vaccinated and may be most effective when emphasizing influenza vaccination's protective impact on the newborn,.
Authors: Eloise Chapman; Pavithra Venkat; Emily Ko; Jorge P Orezzoli; Marcela Del Carmen; Elizabeth I O Garner Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2010-05-10 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Matthew W Kreuter; Melanie C Green; Joseph N Cappella; Michael D Slater; Meg E Wise; Doug Storey; Eddie M Clark; Daniel J O'Keefe; Deborah O Erwin; Kathleen Holmes; Leslie J Hinyard; Thomas Houston; Sabra Woolley Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2007-06
Authors: Melanie E Mouzoon; Flor M Munoz; Anthony J Greisinger; Brenda J Brehm; Oscar A Wehmanen; Frances A Smith; Julie A Markee; W Paul Glezen Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: K Zaman; Eliza Roy; Shams E Arifeen; Mahbubur Rahman; Rubhana Raqib; Emily Wilson; Saad B Omer; Nigar S Shahid; Robert F Breiman; Robert E Breiman; Mark C Steinhoff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mallory K Ellingson; Matthew Z Dudley; Rupali J Limaye; Daniel A Salmon; Sean T O'Leary; Saad B Omer Journal: Expert Rev Vaccines Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 5.217
Authors: Arielle Kaim; Eli Jaffe; Maya Siman-Tov; Ella Khairish; Bruria Adini Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Selçuk Erkılınç; Nazlı Aksoy Kala; Meryem Kuru Pekcan; Ali İrfan Güzel; Mehmet Çınar; Nafiye Yılmaz Journal: J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc Date: 2018-01-24
Authors: Bahaa Abu-Raya; Kirsten Maertens; Kathryn M Edwards; Saad B Omer; Janet A Englund; Katie L Flanagan; Matthew D Snape; Gayatri Amirthalingam; Elke Leuridan; Pierre Van Damme; Vana Papaevangelou; Odile Launay; Ron Dagan; Magda Campins; Anna Franca Cavaliere; Tiziana Frusca; Sofia Guidi; Miguel O'Ryan; Ulrich Heininger; Tina Tan; Ahmed R Alsuwaidi; Marco A Safadi; Luz M Vilca; Nasamon Wanlapakorn; Shabir A Madhi; Michelle L Giles; Roman Prymula; Shamez Ladhani; Federico Martinón-Torres; Litjen Tan; Lessandra Michelin; Giovanni Scambia; Nicola Principi; Susanna Esposito Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 7.561